The intersection of culture, disability and assistive technology

References

• Seymour W. ICTs and disability: exploring the human dimensions of technological engagement. Technol Disabil 2005;17:195–204.
   Google Scholar
• Cook AM, Hussey SM. Assistive technologies: principles and practice. 2nd ed. Toronto: Mosby; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Craddock G. Matching person & technology (MPT) assessment process. Technol Disabil 2002;14:125–131.
   Google Scholar
• Tower KD. Disability through the lens of culture. J Social Work Disabil Rehabil 2003;2:5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Iwama M, Thomson N, Macdonald R. The Kawa model: the power of culturally responsive occupational therapy. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1125–1135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong MJ, Fitzgerald MH. Culture and disability studies: an anthropological perspective. Rehabil Educ 1996;10:247–304.
   Google Scholar
• Iwama M. Occupation as a cross-cultural construct. In: Whiteford GE, Wright-St.Clair V, editors. Occupation and practice in context, Toronto: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005. pp 242–253.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Perspectives on disability and rehabilitation, Toronto, ON: Elsevier, Churchill Livingstone; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Burr V. Social constructionism. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Hetzroni OE, Harris OL. Cultural aspects in the development of AAC users. AAC Augment Altern Commun 1996;12:52–58.
   Google Scholar
• Iwama M. The Kawa (river) model. In: Kronenberg F, Simo Algado S, Pollard N, editors. Occupational therapy without borders: learning from the spirit of survivors, Toronto: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005. pp 213–27.
   Google Scholar
• Brown SE. ‘Oh, don't you envy us our privileged lives?’ a review of the disability culture movement. Disabil Rehabil 1997;19:339–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown SE. What is disability culture? Disabil Studies Q 2002;22:34–50.
   Google Scholar
• Bickenbach JE. Disability, culture and the UN convention. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1111–1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability, and health, Geneva: 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes C. What a difference a decade makes: reflections on doing ‘emancipatory’ disability research. Disabil Soc 2003;18: 3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver M. Emancipatory research: realistic goal or im possible dream? In: Barnes C, Mercer G, editors. Doing disability research, Leeds: The Disability Press; 1997. pp 15–31.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte SR, Ingstad B. Disability and culture: an overview, Berkeley: University of California Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Bickenbach JE, Trotter RT II, Saxena S. Disability and cultural variation: the ICIDH-2 cross-cultural applicability research study. In: Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Bickenbach JE, Trotter RT II, Room R, Rehm J, Saxena S. Disability and culture: universalism and diversity, Toronto: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers; 2001. pp 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Parette P. Transition and assistive technology planning with families across culture. Career Dev Exceptional Individuals 1999;22:213–231.
   Google Scholar
• Harry B, Grenot-Scheyer M, Smith-Lewis M, Park HS, Xin F, Schwartz I. Developing culturally inclusive services for individuals with severe disabilities. J Assoc Persons Severe Handicaps 1995;20:99–109.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang LH, Hadadian A. Chinese and Chinese-American families of children with disabilities. Int J Special Educ 2007;22:20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Deal M. Disabled people's attitudes toward other impairment groups: a hierarchy of impairments. Disabil Soc 2003;18:897–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roon R, Rehm RT, Trotter II RT, Paglia A, Ustun TB. Cross-cultural views. In: Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Bickenbach JE, Trotter RT II, Room R, Rehm J, Saxena, S. Disability and culture: universalism and diversity, Toronto: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers; 2001. pp 247–291.
   Google Scholar
• Fadiman A. The spirit catches you and you fall down: a Hmong child, her American doctors, and the collision of two cultures, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Harry B, Rueda R, Kalyanpur M. Cultural reciprocity in sociocultural perspective: adapting the normalization principle for family collaboration. Exceptional Children 1999;66:123–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phinney JS. Understanding ethnic diversity: the role of ethnic identity. Am Behav Scientist 1996;40:143–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnartt SN. Disability culture or disability consciousness? J Disabil Policy Stud 1996;7:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Browne AJ. Discourses influencing nurses' perceptions of First Nations patients. Can J Nurs Res 2009;41:166–191.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerlach A. “Circle of caring”: a First Nations worldview of child rearing. Can J Occup Ther 2008;75:18–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breines EB, Pellerito J. Editorial: occupational technology: a vision for occupational therapy. Occup Ther Int 2003;10:iii–Vii.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pape TLB, Kim J, Weiner B. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:5–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking C. Function or feelings: factors in abandonment of assistive devices. Technol Disabil 1999;11:3.
   Google Scholar
• Kinavey C. Explanatory models of self-understanding in adolescents born with spina bifida. Qualitative Health Res 2006;16:1091–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooberman-Hill R, Ebrahim S. Making decisions about simple interventions: older people's use of walking aids. Age Ageing 2007;36:569–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skär L. Peer and adult relationships of adolescents with disabilities. J Adoles 2003;26:635–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toombs S. The lived experience of disability. Hum Stud 1995;18:9–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye HS, Yeager P, Reed M. Disparities in usage of assistive technology among people with disabilities. Assist Technol 2008;20:194–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ried S, Strong G, Wright L, Wood A, Goldman A, Bogen D. Computers, assistive devices, and augmentative communication aids: technology for social inclusion. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1995;10:80–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent B, Smith S. They only see it when the sun shines in my ears: exploring perceptions of adolescent hearing aid users. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2006;11:461–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parnes P, Cameron D, Christie N, Cockburn L, Hashemi G, Yoshida K. Disability in low-income countries: issues and implications. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1170–1180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Sacred texts: a sceptical exploration of the assumptions underpinning theories of occupation. Can J Occup Ther 2009;76:6–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasquillo O, Lantigua RA, Shea S. Differences in functional status of Hispanic versus non- Hispanic White elders: data from the medical expenditure panel survey. J Aging Health 2000;12:342–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomita MR, Mann WC, Fraas LF, Burns LL. Racial differences of frail elders in assistive technology. Assist Technol 1997;9:140–151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubin RM, White-Means SI. Race, disability and assistive devices: sociodemographics or discrimination. Int J Social Econ 2001;28:927–941.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford GE, Wilcock AA. Cultural relativism: occupation and independence reconsidered. Can J Occup Ther 2000;67: 324–336.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Isabelle S, Bessey SF, Dragas KL, Blease P, Shepherd JT, Lane SJ. Assistive technology for children with disabilities. Occup Ther Health Care 2002;16:29–51.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson KL, Dudgeon B, Kuehn C, Walker W. Assistive technology use among adolescents and young adults with spina bifida. Am J Public Health 2007;97:330–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge S. Family-centered assistive technology: assessment and intervention practices for early intervention. Infants & Young Children: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Special Care Practices 2002;15:60–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripat J. Function and impact of electronic aids to daily living for experienced users. Technol Disabil 2006;18:79–87.
   Google Scholar
• Parette HP, Brotherson MJ. Family-centered and culturally responsive assistive technology decision making. Infants Young Child 2004;17:355–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutzler Y, Fliess O, Chacham AY. Perspectives of children with physical disabilities on inclusion and empowerment: supporting and limiting factors. Adapted Phys Activity Q 2002;19:300–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craddock G. The AT continuum in education: novice to power user. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2006;1:17–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jutai J, Day H. Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices (PIADS). Technol Disabil 2002;14:107–111.
   Google Scholar
• Benedict RE, Lee JP, Marrujo SK, Farel AM. Assistive devices as an early childhood intervention: evaluating outcomes. Technol Disabil 1999;11:79.
   Google Scholar
• Ostensjo S, Carlberg EB, Vollestad NK. The use and impact of assistive devices and other environmental modifications on everyday activities and care in young children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:849–861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillen A, Soderberg S. Disabled persons' experience of dependence on assistive devices. Scand J Occup Ther 2002;9: 176–183.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell PH, Milbourne S, Wilcox MJ. Adaptation interventions to promote participation in natural settings. Infants & Young Children: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Special Care Practices 2008;21:94–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copley J, Ziviani J. Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occup Ther Int 2004; 11:229–243.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jirikowic T, Rickerson N, Burgstahler S. Life after high school: preparing students with disabilities for successful transitions. OT Practice 2003;8:20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Iwama M. Toward culturally relevant epistemologies in occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther 2003;57:582–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomay VT, Hinkebein JH. Cultural considerations when providing rehabilitation services to American Indians. Rehabil Psychol 2006;51:30–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parette HP, Huer MB, Hourcade JJ. Using assistive technology focus groups with families across cultures. Educ Training Dev Disabil 2003;38:429–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson I, Appelros P, Ahlstrom G. Lifeworld perspectives utilizing assistive devices: individuals lived experience following a stroke. Can J Occup Ther 2007;74:15–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoppestad BS. Inadequacies in computer access using assistive technology devices in profoundly disabled individuals: an overview of the current literature. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2007;2:189–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parette HP, Brotherson MJ, Huer MB. Giving families a voice in augmentative and alternative communication decision-making. Educ Training Mental Retard Dev Disabil 2000;35:177–190.
   Google Scholar
• Wearmouth H, Wielandt T. ‘Reserve is no place for a wheelchair: challenges to consider during wheelchair provision intended for use in First Nations community. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2009;4:321–328.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoenig H, Taylor J, Sloan FA. Does assistive technology substitute for personal assistance among the disabled elderly? Am J Public Health 2003;93:330–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasselkus BR. Culture and occupation: the experience of similarity and difference. The meaning of everyday occupation, Thorofare, NJ: SLACK; 2002. pp 42–56.
   Google Scholar
• Trembath D, Balandin S, Rossi C. Cross-cultural practice and autism. J Intellect Dev Disabil 2005;30:240–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccord MS, Soto G. Perceptions of AAC: an ethnographic investigation of Mexican-American families. Augment Altern Commun 2004;20:209–227.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson S, Williams T. Why is cultural safety essential in health care? Med Law 2007;26:699–707.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Devlieger PJ, Albrecht GL, Hertz M. The production of disability culture among young African-American men. Social Sci Med 2007;64:1948–1959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters S. Is there a disability culture? A syncretisation of three$146#possible world views. Disabil Soc 2000;15:583–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirshbaum M. A disability culture perspective on early inter vention with parents with physical or cognitive dis abilities and their infants. Infants Young Child 2000;13:9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadcasting and Creative Industries Disability Network. Media & Disability. Broadcasting and Creative Industries Disability Network, 2007. http://www.mediaanddisability.org/portrayal.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton D, Seymour W. Technology, selfhood and physical disability. Social Sci Med 2000;50:1851–1862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seelman KD. Technology for full citizenship: challenges for the research community. In: Winters JM, Stroy MF, editors. Medical Instrumentation: accessibility and usability considerations, Boca Raton, CRC Press; 2007. pp 307–320.
   Google Scholar
• Menon A, Korner Bitensky N, Straus S. Best practice use in stroke rehabilitation: from trials and tribulations to solutions! Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:646–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar