329
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Emerging technologies and web accessibility: research challenges and opportunities focussing on vision issues

&
Pages 1-19 | Accepted 01 Nov 2010, Published online: 24 Dec 2010

References

  • Various. Prevalence of disability by age, sex, race, and hispanic origin: 1997. USA Government2001.
  • World Health Organisation. Magnitude and causes of visual impairment. 2009. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs282/en/. Last accessed 8 July 2010.
  • European Union Policy Survey. e-accessibility of public sector services in the European union. European Union Policy Survey, United Kingdom Government Cabinet Office (RNIB and AbilityNet and DCU and RNID and Socitm). 2005.
  • Hanson VL, Richards JT, Harper S, Trewin S. Accessing the web. Human factors and ergonomics series C: The universal access handbook. In: Stephanidis, editor. 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group (CRC Press); 2009 Chapter 10, pp 10.1–10.15.
  • Jacobs J, Hammerman-Rozenberg R, Maaravi Y, Cohen A, Stessman J. The impact of visual impairment on health, function and mortality. Aging Clin Exp Res 2005;17:281–286.
  • Cook AM, Hussey S. Assistive technologies: principles and practice. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2001.
  • Laux LF, Mcnally PR, Paciello MG, Vanderheiden GC. Designing the world wide web for people with disabilities: a user centered design approach. In: Assets '96: Proceedings of the Second Annual ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press1996. pp 94–101.
  • Burstein CD. Viewable with any browser. http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/. 2008. Last accessed 11 January 2009.
  • Lawson B. United Kingdom government browser guidelines. 2009. http://www.webstandards.org/2009/01/19/uk-government-browser-guidelines-good-sense-prevails/. Last accessed 11 January 2009.
  • W3CSCHOOLS. 2010. W3cshools browser usage statistics. http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers stats.asp . Last accessed 3 January 2010.
  • Power C, Petrie H. Accessibility in non-professional web authoring tools: a missed web 2.0 opportunity? In: W4A '07: Proceedings of the 2007 International Cross-disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press2007. pp 116–119.
  • Horrocks I, Bechhofer S. Human–computer interaction series: semantic web. LondonSpringer2008. Chapter 19, pp 315–330.
  • Mcguinness DL, Van Harmelen F. OWL web ontology language overview. W3C Recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium. 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/owlfeatures/.
  • Berners Lee, T. Weaving the Web. United Kingdom: Orion Business Books; 1999.
  • Fensel D, Sycara K, Mylopoulos J, editors. Proceedings of the 2nd International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2870. Springer2003.
  • Mcilraith SA, Plexousakis D, Harmelen FV, editors. Proceedings of the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3928. Hiroshima, Japan: Springer2004.
  • Seeman L. The semantic web, web accessibility, and device independence. In: W4A '04: Proceedings of the 2004 International Cross-disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press2004. pp 67–73.
  • Harper S, Yesilada Y. Web authoring for accessibility (WAfA). Web Semantics: Science Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 2007;5:175–179.
  • Volkel M. Semwiki: a restful distributed wiki architecture. In: WikiSym '06: Proceedings of the 2006 International Symposium on Wikis. New York, NY, USA: ACM2006. pp 141–142.
  • Buffa M, Gandon F. Sweetwiki: semantic web enabled technologies in wiki. In: WikiSym '06: Proceedings of the 2006 International Symposium on Wikis. New York, NY, USA: ACM2006. pp 69–78.
  • Berners Lee T. RDF in HTML. 2002. http://www.w3.org/2002/04/htmlrdf. Last accessed 8 July 2010.
  • Adida B, Birbeck M. RDFA Primer: Bridging the Human and Data Webs. 2008. http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtmlrdfaprimer/ , Editors: RDFinHTML Task Force. Last accessed 3 January 2010.
  • Flores FC, Quint V, Vatton I. Templates, microformats and structured editing. In: DocEng '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. New York, NY, USA: ACM2006. pp 188–197.
  • Khare R, Celik T. Microformats: a pragmatic path to the semantic web. In: WWW '06: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY, USA: ACM2006. pp 865–866.
  • Harper S, Stevens R, Goble C. Towel: real world mobility on the web. Computer-aided design of user interfaces II. In: Vanderdonckt J, Puerta A, editors. Kluwer Academic1999. pp 305–314.
  • Celik T, Diab A, Mcallister I, Panzer J, Rifkin A, Sippey M. hReview 0.3. 2006. http://microformats.org/wiki/hreview . Last accessed 3 January 2010.
  • Celik T, Suba B. hCard 1.0. 2010. http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard . Last accessed 3 January 2010.
  • Goel K, Guha RV, Hanson O. Introducing rich snippets. 2009. http://googleWebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/05/introducing-rich-snippets.html . Last accessed 3 January 2010.
  • Hassanzadeh O, Lim L, Kementsietsidis A, Wang M. A declarative framework for semantic link discovery over relational data. In: WWW '09: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY, USA: ACM2009. pp 1101–1102.
  • Bizer C, Heath T, Idehen K, Berners Lee T. Linked data on the web (LDOW2008). In: WWW '08: Proceeding of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY, USA: ACM2008. pp 1265–1266.
  • Zhai Y, Shah M. Tracking news stories across different sources. In In MULTIMEDIA '05: Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia. New York, NY, USA: ACM2005. pp 2–10.
  • Abel F. The benefit of additional semantics in folksonomy systems. In: PIKM '08: Proceedings of the Second PhD Workshop on Information and Knowledge Management. New York: ACM2008. pp 49–56.
  • Recordon D, Reed D. Openid 2.0: a platform for user-centric identity management. In: DIM'06: Proceedings of the Second ACM Workshop on Digital Identity Management. New York, NY, USA: ACM2006. pp 11–16.
  • Reed D, Chasen L, Tan W. Openid identity discovery with xri and xrds. In: IDtrust '08: Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Identity and Trust on the Internet. New York, NY, USA: ACM2008. pp 19–25.
  • Begeddov G, Brickley D, Dornfest R, Davis I, Dodds L, Eisenzopf J, Galbraith D, Guha R, Miller E, Van Der Vlist E. RSS 1.0 Specification Protocol. 2000. http://web.resource.org/rss/1.0/spec, Last accessed 16 December 2010
  • Lewin J. Content feeds with RSS 2.0: syndication goes mainstream. Acessado 12. 2004. http: //www.106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/xrss20 .
  • Nottingham M, Sayre R. The Atom Syndication Format. 2005. http://tools.ietf.org/ html/rfc4287 .
  • Blekas A, Garofalakis J, Stefanis V. Use of rss feeds for content adaptation in mobile web browsing. In: W4A: Proceedings of the 2006 International Cross-disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press2006. pp 79–85.
  • Lyndersay S. Windows and rss: beyond blogging. In: SIGMOD '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press2006. pp 723–723.
  • Cudre’ Mauroux P, Haghani P, Jost M, Aberer K, De Meer H. idmesh: graph-based disambiguation of linked data. In: WWW '09: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY, USA: ACM2009. pp 591–600.
  • Shadbolt N, Berners-lee T, Hendler J, Hart C, Benjamins R. The next wave of the web. In: WWW '06: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, USA: ACM Press2006. pp 750–750.
  • White B. The implications of web 2.0 on web information systems. In: Web information systems and technologiesJoaquim Filipe, José Cordeiro and Vitor Pedrosa, editors. Vol. 1. USA: Springer Lecture Notes; 2006. pp 3–7.
  • O'reilly T, Battelle J. What is web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. 2005. http://www.oreillynet.com/lpt/a/6228 . Last accessed 03 January 2010.
  • Chang E, Ong K, Boll S, Ma WY. Rich media and web 2.0. In: WWW '08: Proceeding of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY, USA: ACM2008. pp 1259–1260.
  • Rocha M, Maia M, Cunha I, Almeida J, Campos S. Scalable media streaming to interactive users. In: MULTIMEDIA '05: Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia. New York, NY, USA: ACM2005. pp 966–975.
  • Murphy S. Accessibility of graphics in technical documentation for the cognitive and visually impaired. In: SIGDOC '05: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference on Design of Communication. New York, NY, USA: ACM2005. pp 12–17.
  • Jackson D. Scalable vector graphics (svg): the world wide web consortium's recommendation for high quality web graphics. In: SIGGRAPH '02: ACM SIGGRAPH 2002 conference abstracts and applications. New York, NY, USA: ACM2002. pp 319.
  • Miyashita H, Sato D, Takagi H, Asakawa C. Aibrowser for multimedia: introducing multimedia content accessibility for visually impaired users. In: Assets '07: Proceedings of the 9th International ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and Accessibility. New York, NY, USA: ACM2007. pp 91–98.
  • Petreley N. Ajax simplified. Linux J 2007;157:1.
  • Lerner RM. At the forge: Ajax application design. Linux J 2006;152:9.
  • Gibson B. Enabling an accessible web 2.0. In: W4A '07: Proceedings of the 2007 International Cross-disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A). New York, NY, USA: ACM2007. pp 1–6.
  • Cooper M. Accessibility of emerging rich web technologies: web 2.0 and the semantic web. In: W4A '07: Proceedings of the 2007 International Cross-disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility. New York, NY, USA: ACM2007. pp 93–98.
  • Thiessen P, Chen C. Ajax live regions: chat as a case example. In: W4A '07: Proceedings of the 2007 International Cross-disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility. New York, NY, USA: ACM2007. pp 7–14.
  • Chen CL, Raman TV. Axsjax: a talking translation bot using google im: bringing web-2.0 applications to life. In: W4A '08: Proceedings of the 2008 International Cross-disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A). New York, NY, USA: ACM2008. pp 54–56.
  • Lunn D, Harper S, Bechhofer S. Combining sadie and axsjax to improve the accessibility of web content. In: W4A '09: Proceedings of the 2009 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibililty (W4A). New York, NY, USA: ACM2009. pp 75–78.
  • Sire S, Paquier M, Vagner A, Bogaerts J. A messaging api for inter-widgets communication. In: WWW '09: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY, USA: ACM2009. pp 1115–1116.
  • Lephuoc D, Polleres A, Hauswirth M, Tummarello G, Morbidoni C. Rapid prototyping of semantic mash-ups through semantic web pipes. In: WWW '09: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY, USA: ACM2009. pp 581–590.
  • Ennals R, Brewer E, Garofalakis M, Shadle M, Gandhi P. Intel mash maker: join the web. SIGMOD Rec 2007;36:27–33.
  • Lin J, Wong J, Nichols J, Cypher A, Lau TA. End-user programming of mashups with vegemite. In: IUI '09: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. New York, NY, USA: ACM2009. pp 97–106.
  • Baresi L, Morasca S. Three empirical studies on estimating the design effort of web applications. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol 2007;16:15.
  • Di Lucca GA, Distante D, Bernardi ML. Recovering conceptual models from web applications. In: SIGDOC '06: Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM International Conference on Design of Communication. New York, NY, USA: ACM2006. pp 113–120.
  • Zucker DF. What does Ajax mean for you? Interactions 2007;14:10–12.
  • Hyde A. Easy youtube. 2008. http://icant.co.uk/easyyoutube/ and http: //scriptingenabled.org/2008/10/easy youtube and learning disabilities/ . Last accessed 11 January 2009.
  • Jeschke S, Pfeiffer O, Vieritz H. Using web accessibility patterns for web application development. In: SAC '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing. New York, NY, USA: ACM2009. pp 129–135.
  • Leventhal A. 2006. Structure benefits all. In: W4A '06: Proceedings of the 2006 International Cross-disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility. New York, NY: ACM; 2006. pp 33–37.
  • Freire AP, Goularte R, De Mattos Fortes RP. Techniques for developing more accessible web applications: a survey towards a process classification. In: SIGDOC '07: Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM International Conference on Design of Communication. New York, NY, USA: ACM2007. pp 162–169.
  • Manzato MG, Coimbra DB, Goularte R. Multimedia content personalization based on peer-level annotation. In: EuroITV '09: Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on European Interactive Television Conference. New York, NY, USA: ACM2009. pp 57–66.
  • Epelde G, Carrasco E, Zimmermann G, Bund J, Dubielzig M, Alexandersson J. Urc based accessible tv. In: EuroITV '09: Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on European Interactive Television Conference. New York, NY, USA: ACM2009. pp 111–114.
  • Harper S, Patel N. Gist summaries for visually impaired surfers. In: Assets '05: Proceedings of the 7th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press2005. pp 90–97.
  • Hazael-Massieux D. The mobile web initiative. 2009. http://www.w3.org/Mobile/ . Last accessed 3 January 2010.
  • Powers S. Air out your desktop with adobe. Linux J 2009;179:4.
  • Bolstad LE, Machin A, Womer M. Geolocation Working Group Overview. 2009. http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/ . Last accessed 3 January 2010.
  • Yesilada Y, Chuter A, Henry SL. Shared web experiences: barriers common to mobile device users and people with disabilities. W3C. 2008. http://www.w3.org/WAI/mobile/experiences .
  • Cavender A, Ladner RE, Riskin E. A. 2006. Mobileasl: intelligibility of sign language video as constrained by mobile phone technology. In Assets '06: Proceedings of the 8th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 71–78.
  • Aizpurua A, Arrue M, Vigo M, Abascal J. Transition of accessibility evaluation tools to new standards. In: W4A '09: Proceedings of the 2009 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibililty (W4A). New York, USA: ACM2009. pp 36–44.
  • AbouZahra S. Semantic Web enabled web accessibility evaluation tools. In: W4A '05: Proceedings of the 2005 International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A). New York: ACM2005. pp 99–101.
  • Reid LG, Snow-Weaver A. WCAG 2.0: a web accessibility standard for the evolving web. In: W4A '08: Proceedings of the 2008 International Cross-disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A). New York, NY, USA: ACM2008. pp 109–115.
  • Termens M, Ribera M, Porras M, Boldu M, Sule’ A, Paris P. Web content accessibility guidelines: from 1.0 to 2.0. In: WWW '09: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY, USA: ACM2009. pp 1171–1172.
  • Leporini B, Paterno F, Scorcia A. Flexible tool support for accessibility evaluation. Interact Comput 2006;18:869–890.
  • Arrue M, Vigo M, Abascal J. Including heterogeneous web accessibility guidelines in the development process. Engineering Interactive Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2008;4940:620–637.
  • Hickson I, Hyatt D. HTML5: a vocabulary and associated APIs for HTML and XHTML. 2010. http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#other applicable specifications . Last accessed 3 January 2010.
  • HTML Working Group. HTML5 milestones. http://www.w3. org/html/wg/#schedm . Last accessed November 2009.
  • Clark J. To hell with WCAG 2. 2006. http://www.alistapart.com/articles/tohellwithwcag2. Last accessed 3 January 2010.
  • Tolksdorf R, Simperl EPB. Towards wikis as semantic hypermedia. In: WikiSym '06: Proceedings of the 2006 International Symposium on Wikis. New York, NY, USA: ACM2006. pp 79–88.
  • Chuter A, Yesilada Y. Relationship between mobile web best practices (MWBP) and web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG). W3C. 2008. http://www.w3.org/TR/mwbpwcag/ .
  • Parikh TS. Mobile phones may be the right devices for supporting developing world accessibility, but is the www the right service delivery model? In: W4A: Proceedings of the 2006 International Cross-disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press2006. pp 143–146.
  • Jain R. The mobile web in developing countries. In W3C Workshop on the Mobile Web in Developing Countries. 2006. http://research.google.com/pubs/pub34631.html .
  • W3C MATHML WG. What is MathML. http://www.w3.org/Math/ . Last accessed 3 January 2010.
  • Fredj ZB, Duce DA. Grassml: accessible smart schematic diagrams for all. In: W4A '06: Proceedings of the 2006 International Cross-disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility. New York, NY, USA: ACM2006. pp 57–60.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.