A review of the evidence underpinning the use of visual and auditory feedback for computer technology in post-stroke upper-limb rehabilitation

References

• Strong K, Mathers C, Bonita R. Preventing stroke: saving lives around the world. Lancet Neurol 2007;6:182–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. National Stroke Strategy, 2007. Crown Copyright. London; http://www.dh.gov.uk/dr_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_081059.pdf . Last accessed 4 February 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, Wood Dauphinee S, Richards C, Ashburn A, Miller K, Lincoln N, Partridge C, Wellwood I, Langhorne P. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2004;35:2529–2539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock A, Baer G, Pomeroy V, Langhorne P. Physiotherapy treatment approaches for the recovery of postural control and lower limb function following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;1:CD001920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSP. A new ambition for stroke. A consultation on national strategy response from the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. London: Chartered Society of Physiotherapy; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Reducing Brain Damage: Faster access to better stroke care. 2005. Report by the comptroller and auditor general. HC 452 Session 2005–2006. London: National Audit Office.
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:111–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil 2007;14:52–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountain GA, Ware PM, Hammerton J, Mawson SJ, Zheng J, Davies R, Black N, Zhou H, Hu H, Harris N, Eccleston. The SMART project: a user led approach to developing applications for domiciliary stroke rehabilitation. Designing accessible technology. In: Clarkson P, Langdon J, Robinson P, editors. London: Springer-Verlag; 2006. pp 135–144.
   Google Scholar
• Mountain G, Wilson S, Eccleston C, Mawson S, Hammerton J, Ware T, Zheng H, Davies R, Black N, Harris N, Stone T, Hu H. Developing and testing a telerehabilitation system for people following stroke: issues of usability. J Eng Des 2010;21:223–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker J, Mountain GA, Hammerton J. An investigation into stroke patients' utilisation of feedback from computer-based technology. Designing inclusive interactions. In: Langdon P, Clarkson J, Robinson P, editors. London: Springer-Verlag; 2010. pp 167–176.
   Google Scholar
• Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guidelines for stroke: improving motor control. 3rd ed. London: Royal College of Physicians.2008.
   Google Scholar
• Van Vliet P, Wulf G. Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: what is the evidence? Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:831–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magill RA. Augmented feedback. In: Motor learning and control: concepts and applications. 8th ed. Maghill RA, editor. London: McGraw Hill; 2007. pp 331–359.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt RA, Wrisberg CA. Augmented feedback. Motor learning and performance: a situation-based learning approach. 4th ed. Leeds, UK: Human Kinetics; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Winward CE, Halligan PW, Wade DT. Somatosensory recovery: a longitudinal study of the first 6 months after unilateral stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:293–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreisel SH, Hennerici MG, Bäzner H. Pathophysiology of stroke rehabilitation: the natural course of clinical recovery, use-dependent plasticity and rehabilitative outcome. Cerebrovas Dis 2007;23:243–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra L, Ratan R. Recent advances in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2006;38:235–237.
   Google Scholar
• Richards LG, Stewart KC, Woodbury ML, Senesac C, Cauraugh JH. Movement-dependent stroke recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence. Neuropsychologia 2008;46:3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakauer JW. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 2006;19:84–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barker RN, Brauer SG. Upper limb recovery after stroke: the stroke survivors' perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:1213–1223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:741–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumway-Cook AWM, Woollacott M. Motor control. Translating research into clinical practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, London: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ballinger C, Ashburn A, Low J, Roderick P. Unpacking the black box of therapy – a pilot study to describe occupational therapy and physiotherapy interventions for people with stroke. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:301–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJong G, Horn SD, Gassaway JA, Slavin MD, Dijkers MP. Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions: using an inductive approach to examine the “black box” of rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:678–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartvelt A, Hegarty JR. Augmented feedback and physiotherapy practice. Physiotherapy 1996;82:480–490.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlin-Wottrich AW, Stenstrom CH, Engardt M, Tham K, Von Koch L. Characteristics of physiotherapy sessions from the patient's and therapist's perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:1198–1205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson C, Rubenach S, Mhurchu CN, Clark M, Spencer C, Windsor A. Home or hospital for stroke rehabilitation? Results of a randomized controlled trial. I. Health outcomes at 6 months. Stroke 2000;31:1024–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saka Ö, Serra V, Samyshkin Y, McGuire A, Wolfe C. Cost-Effectiveness of stroke care followed by early supported discharge. Stroke 2009;40:24–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legg L, Langhorne P, Drummond AE, Gladmann JR, Logan PA, Walker MF. Rehabilitation services for stroke patients living at home: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2004;363:352–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Early supported discharge trialists: services for reducing duration of hospital care for acute stroke clients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;2:CD000443.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Outpatients service trialists' collaboration: therapy-based rehabilitation services for stroke clients at home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;1: CD002925. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002925
   Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Taylor G, Murray G, Dennis M, Anderson C, Bautz-Holter E, Dey P, Indredavik B, Mayo N, Power M, Rodgers H, Ronning OM, Rudd A, Suwanwela N, Widen-Holmqvist L, Wolfe C. Early supported discharge services for stroke clients: a meta-analysis of individual patients' data. Lancet 2005;365:501–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disler PB, Wade DT. Should all stroke rehabilitation be home based? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:733–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones F. Strategies to enhance chronic disease self-management: how can we apply this to stroke? Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:841–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Royal Society. Digital healthcare: the impact of information and communication technologies on health and healthcare. LondonThe Royal Society2006.
   Google Scholar
• Liebermann DG, Buchman AS, Franks IM. Enhancement of motor rehabilitation through the use of information technologies. Clin Biomech 2006;21:8–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The Smart Consortium 2009. http://www.thesmartconsortium.org/Smart_2/index.php . Last accessed January 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Yavuzer G, Selles R, Sezer N, Sütbeyaz S, Bussmann JB, Köseoğlu F, Atay MB, Stam HJ. Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89:393–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piron L, Tombolini P, Turolla A, Zucconi C, Agostini M, Dam M, Santarello G, Piccione F, Tonin P. Reinforced feedback in virtual environment facilitates the arm recovery in patients after a recent stroke. IEEE Virtual Rehabil 2007;September:121–123.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore PE, Spaulding SJ. Motor learning and the use of videotape feedback after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2007;14:28–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maulucci RA, Eckhouse RH. Retraining reaching in chronic stroke with real-time auditory feedback. Neurorehabilitation 2001;16:171–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critical Skills Appraisal Programme (CASP) 2009. Homepage, OxfordLearning & Development Public Health Resource Unit http://www.phru.nhs.uk/Doc_Links/rct%20appraisal%20tool.pdf. Last accessed November 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran VS, Altschuler EL. The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function. Brain 2009;132:1693–1710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawner K, Lavigne J. Brunnstrom's movement therapy in hemiplegia: a neurophysiological approach. Philadelphia, PAJB Lippincott1992.
   Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a Modified Ashworth Scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 1987;67:206–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FJ. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil 1987;1:6–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind, S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med, 1975;975:13–31.
   Google Scholar
• Klein RM, Bell B. Self-care skills: behavioral measurement with Klein-Bell ADL scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982; 63:335–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, Opzoomer A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian occupational performance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther 1990;57:82–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cirstea CM, Levin MF. Improvement of arm movement patterns and endpoint control depends on type of feedback during practice in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21:398–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirstea CM, Ptito A, Levin MF. Feedback and cognition in arm motor skill reacquisition after stroke. Stroke 2006;37:1237–1242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mount J, Pierce SR, Parker J, DiEgidio R, Woessner R, Spiegel L. Trial and error versus errorless learning of functional skills in patients with acute stroke. NeuroRehabilitation 2007;22:123–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezekiel HJ, Lehto NK, Marley TL, Wishart LR, Lee TD. Application of motor learning principles: the physiotherapy client as a problem-solver III augmented feedback. Physiother Can 2001;53:33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Talvitie U. Socio-affective characteristics and properties of extrinsic feedback in physiotherapy. Physiother Res Int 2000;5:173–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Talvite U, Reunanen M. Interaction between physiotherapists and patients in stroke rehabilitation. Physiotherapy 2002;88:77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Orrell AJ, Eves FF, Masters RSW. Motor learning of a dynamic balancing task after stroke: implicit implications for stroke rehabilitation. Phys Ther 2006;86:369–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt RA, Wulf G. Continuous concurrent feedback degrades skill learning: implications for training and simulation. Hum Factors 1997;39:509–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf G. Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning: implications for physiotherapy. Physiotherapy 2007;93:96–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf G. Facilitating independence, motivation and motor learning. Physiotherapy 2007;93:87–88.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson MJ, Feng X, Johnson LM, Winters JM. Potential of a suite of robot/computer-assisted motivating systems for personalized, home-based, stroke rehabilitation. J NeuroEng Rehabil 2007;4:6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siekierka EM, Eng K, Bassetti C, Blickenstorfer A, Cameirao, MS, Dietz V, Duff A, Erol F, Ettlin T, Hermann DM, KellerT, Keisker B, Kesselring J, Kleiser R, Kollias S, KoolJP, Kurre A, Mangold S, Nef T, Pyk P, Riener R, Schuster C, Tosi F, Verschure PFMJ, Zimmerli L. New technologies and concepts for rehabilitation in the acute phase of stroke: a collaborative matrix. Neurodegener Dis 2007;4:57–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans AAA, Seelen HAM, Willmann RD, Kingma H. Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design. J NeuroEng Rehabil 2009;6:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar