Assistive devices utilisation in activities of everyday life – a proposed framework of understanding a user perspective

References

• Rybarczyk B, Nyenhuis DL, Nicholas JJ, Cash SM, Kaiser J. Body image, perceived social stigma, and the prediction of psychosocial adjustment to leg amputation. Rehabilitation psychology 1995;40:95–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves ES, Boninger ML, Cooper R, Fitzgerald SG, Gray DB, Cooper RA. Assessing the influence of wheelchair technology on perception of participation in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1854–1858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjödahl Hammarlund C. Gait re-education in transfemoral amputees [doctoral dissertation]. Lund, Sweden; 2004. 58 p. Lund university, Faculty of medicine, Department of physiotherapy. Available from: http://www.lu.se/o.o.i.s?id = 12588&postid = 466765
   Google Scholar
• Krantz O. Social construction of technical aids. Personal meaning and interactional effects of disability and assistive devices in everyday life [doctoral dissertation]. Lund, Sweden; 2009. 226 p. Lund university, Faculty of medicine, Department of health sciences. Doctoral dissertation series 2009:23. Available from: http://www.lu.se/o.o.i.s?id = 12588&postid = 1296117
   Google Scholar
• Goffman E. Stigma. London: Penguin books Ltd; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Wendell S. Unhealthy disabled: treating chronic illnesses as disabilities. Hypatia 2001;16:17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Glueckauf R. Assessing the benefits of assistive technologies for activities and participation. Rehabilitation psychology 2005;50:132–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson N, Woods B. No wheelchairs beyond this point: a historical examination of wheelchair access in the twentieth century in Britain and America. Social policy & society 2005;4:97–105.
   Google Scholar
• Bergström AL, Samuelsson K. Evaluation of manual wheelchairs by individuals with spinal cord injuries. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2006;1:175–182.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krantz O, Edberg AK, Persson D. The experience of active wheelchair provision and aspects of importance concerning the wheelchair among experienced users in Sweden. Review of disability studies 2011; (Accepted for publication).
   Google Scholar
• Cooper RA. Wheelchair selection and configuration. USA: Demos; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz BJ, Bowers BJ. Disability in everyday life. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1037–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher P. Introduction to the special issue on psychosocial perspectives on amputation and prosthetics. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:827–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare T. Review article: disability studies today and tomorrow. Sociol Health Illn 2005;27:138–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: WHO Library cataloguing-in-publication data; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Imrie R. Demystifying disability: a review of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Sociol Health Illn 2004;26:287–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton D, Seymour W. Technology, selfhood and physical disability. Soc Sci Med 2000;50:1851–1862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson Lund M. Nygård L. Incorporating or resisting assistive devices: different approaches to achieving a desired occupational self-image. OTJR: Occupation, participation and health 2003;23:67–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyberd PJ, Light C, Chappell PH, Nightingale JM, Whatley D, Evans M. The design of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: a study of the Southampton hand. Robotica 2001;19:593–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Cushman LA. Measuring subjective quality of life following spinal cord injury: a validation study of the assistive technology device predisposition assessment. Disabil Rehabil 2001;23:387–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Cushman LA. Determining the content for an interactive training programme and interpretive guidelines for the Assistive Technology Device Predisposition Assessment. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:126–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. The change in emphasis from people to person: introduction to the special issue on assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Sax C, Vanbiervliet A, Cushman LA, Scherer JV. Predictors of assistive technology use: the importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:1321–1331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandywell B. The myth of everyday life. Toward a heterology of the ordinary. In memoriam Steven A. Crook (1950–2002). Cultural studies 2004:2–3:160–180.
   Google Scholar
• Shields R. A resumé of everyday life. Space and culture 2002;5:4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Burkitt I. The time and space of everyday life. Cultural studies 2004;18(2/3):211–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P. Distinction. Great Britain: Routledge; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P. Kultursociologiska texter. Stockholm/Skåne: Brutus Östlings bokförlag symposion AB; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P. Kultur och kritik. Uddevalla: Daidalos; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Gething L. Judgements by health professionals of personal characteristics of people with a visible physical disability. Soc Sci Med 1992;34:809–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duedahl P. Perspectives: outcasts after all? Scandinavian journal of disability research 2005;7(3/4):220–228.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards C, Imrie R. Disability and bodies as bearers of value. Sociology 2003;37:239–256.
   Google Scholar
• Lipson JG, Rogers JG. Cultural aspects of disability. J Transcult Nurs 2000;11:212–219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taub DE, McLorg PA, Fanflik PL. Stigma management strategies among women with physical disabilities: contrasting approaches of downplaying or claiming a disability status. Deviant behavior 2004;25:169–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang LH, Kleinman A, Link BG, Phelan JC, Lee S, Good B. Culture and stigma: adding moral experience to stigma theory. Soc Sci Med 2007;64:1524–1535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shildrik M, Price J. Breaking the boundaries of the broken body. Body & society 1996;2:93–113.
   Google Scholar
• Asbring P, Närvänen AL. Women’s experiences of stigma in relation to chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. Qual Health Res 2002;12:148–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taleporos G, McCabe MP. The impact of physical disability on body esteem. Sexuality and disability 2001;19:293–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gannon B, Nolan B. The impact of disability transitions on social inclusion. Soc Sci Med 2007;64:1425–1437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breakey JW. Body image: the inner mirror. Journal of prosthetics and orthotics 1997;9:107–112.
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran VS. Consciousness and body image: lessons from phantom limbs, Capgras syndrome and pain asymbolia. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci 1998;353:1851–1859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannery JC, Faria SH. Limb loss: alterations in body image. J Vasc Nurs 1999;17:100–6; quiz 107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desmond D, MacLachalan M. Psychosocial issues in the field of prosthetics and orthotics. Journal of prosthetics and orthotics 2002;1:19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Cash TF. Body image: past, present, and future. Body Image 2004;1:1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pruzinsky T, Cash TF. Understanding body images: historical and contemporary perspectives. In: Cash, TF, Pruzinsky, T. editors. Body image: a handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice. New York: The Guilford press; 2004. p. 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Rudiger JA, Cash TF, Roehrig M, Thompson JK. Day-to-day body-image states: prospective predictors of intra-individual level and variability. Body Image 2007;4:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen HK, Hanson C. Body image and exercise in people with and without acquired mobility disability. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:289–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price EH. A critical review of reports and theories of phantom limbs amongst congenitally limb-deficient subjects and a proposed theory for the developmental origins of body image. Consciousness and cognition 2006;15:310–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson D, Erlandsson LK, Eklund M, Iwarsson S. Value dimensions, meaning, and complexity in human occupation – a tentative structure for analysis. Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy 2001;8:7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Erlandsson LK, Persson D. Brott och smutstvätt – en betraktelse av vardagens sysslor genom en litterär lins. In: Perspektiver på aktivitetsvidenskab – en antologi. Copenhagen, Denmark: FADL; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Sirkka M, Brännholm IB. Consequences of a hip fracture in activity performance and life satisfaction in an elderly Swedish clientele. Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy 2003;10:34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson AB. A primer on limb prosthetics. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C Thomas publisher ltd; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Eftring H. The useworthiness of robots for people with physical disabilities [doctoral dissertation]. Lund, Sweden; 1999. 188 p. Lund University, Department of design sciences, Division of rehabilitation engineering research. Doctoral dissertation series 1999:1. Available from: http://www.lu.se/o.o.i.s?id = 12588&postid = 19270
   Google Scholar
• Pillet J, Didierjean-Pillet A. Aesthetic hand prosthesis: gadget or therapy? Presentation of a new classification. J Hand Surg Br 2001;26:523–528.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krantz O, Bolin K, Persson D. Stigma-handling strategies in everyday life among women aged 20 to 30 with transversal upper limb reduction deficiency. Scandinavian journal of disability research 2009;10:209–226.
   Google Scholar
• Hallström I, Elander G. A comparison of patient needs as ranked by patients and nurses. Scand J Caring Sci 2001;15:228–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslow AH. Preface to motivation theory. Psychosomatic medicine 1943;5:85–92.
   Google Scholar
• Maslow AH. A theory of human motivation. Psychological review 1943;50:370–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahba MA, Bridwell LG. Maslow reconsidered: a review of research on the need hierarchy theory. Organizational behavior and human performance 1976;15:212–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowan J. Ascent and descent in Maslow’s theory. Journal of humanistic psychology 1999;39:125–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koltko-Rivera ME. Rediscovering the later version of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: self-transcendence and opportunities for theory, research, and unification. Review of general psychology 2006;10:302–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsukamoto Y. Pinpointing of an upper limb prosthesis. Journal of prosthetics and orthotics 2000;12:5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lestel D, Grundmann E. Tools, techniques and animals: the role of mediations of actions in the dynamics of social behaviours. Social science information 1999;38:367–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck B. Animal tool behavior: the use and manufacture of tools by animals. New York: Garland STPM press; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Rodenbeck E. No man’s land: bodies and technology in the first world war [Internet]. New York, USA; 1995– [cited 2004-11-15]; Available from: http://eric.stamen.com/ww1/nomans/nomansland.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ISO 9999:2007 Assistive products for persons with disability – classification and terminology (4th ed.) [Internet]. Solna, Sweden: Hjälpmedelsinstitutet (The Swedish handicap institute). 2007 [cited 2009 May 11]. Available from: http://www.hi.se/
   Google Scholar