Mobility and mobility-related participation outcomes of powered wheelchair and scooter interventions after 4-months and 1-year use

References

• United Nations. Standard rules on the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities. New York United Nations Department of Public Information; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization [WHO]. Disability and Rehabilitation Action plan 2006–2011. [cited 2006 Aug 18]; Available at http://www.who.int/disabilities/
   Google Scholar
• Nordic Cooperation on Disability. Provision of assistive technology in the Nordic countries. 2nd Edn. Vällingby: Sweden; Nordic cooperation on disability; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization [WHO]. Guidelines on the provision of wheelchairs in less resourced settings 2008 [cited 2011Jan]; Available at: http://www.who.int/disabilities/publications/technology/wheelchairguidelines/en/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrer MJ. Assessing the efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of assistive technology interventions for enhancing mobility. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:149–158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Auger C, Demers L, Gélinas I, Jutai J, Fuhrer MJ, DeRuyter F. Powered mobility for middle-aged and older adults: Systematic review of outcomes and appraisal of published evidence. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008;87:666–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salminen AL, Brandt A, Samuelsson K, Töytäri O, Malmivaara A. Mobility devices to promote activity and participation: A systematic review. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:697–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoenig H, Giacobbi P, Levy CE. Methodological challenges confronting researchers of wheeled mobility aids and other assistive technologies. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:159–168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wessels RD, de Witte L, Andrich R, Ferrario M, Persson J, Oberg B. IPPA, a usercentred approach to assess effectiveness of assistive technology provision. Technol Disabil 2000;13:105–115.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization [WHO]. WHODAS II. [cited 2006 Sept 12] Available at: http://www.who.int/icidh/whodas/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson I, Ahlström G, Törnquist K. The value of an outdoor powered wheelchair with regard to the quality of life of persons with stroke: A follow-up study. Assist Technol 2007;19:143–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt A, Iwarsson S, Ståhle A. Older people’s use of powered wheelchairs for activity and participation. J Rehabil Med 2004;36:70–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson I, Appelros P, Ahlström G. Lifeworld perspectives utilizing assistive devices: Individuals, lived experience following a stroke. Can J Occup Ther 2007;74:15–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davies A, De Souza LH, Frank AO. Changes in the quality of life in severely disabled people following provision of powered indoor/outdoor chairs. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:286–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau-Harrison K, Rochette A, Routhier F, Dessureault D, Thibault F, Côté O. Impact of wheelchair acquisition on social participation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2009;4:344–352.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hjälpmedelsinstitutet. Äldrestatistik 2010. Äldres hälsa, funktionsnedsättning, boende och hjälpmedel [Statistics on old people 2010. Elderlies health, disability, living and assistive devices]. Vällingby: Hjälpmedelsinstitutet; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt Å, Stapelfeldt C. Forbrug af mobilitetshjælpemidler 2002–2006 - på basis af data fra Zealand Care [Use of mobility devices 2002–2006 – based on data from Zealand care]. Århus: Hjælpemiddelinstituttet; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kolomainen U. Sähköisten liikkumisapuvälineiden myöntämiskäytännöt sairaanhoitopiireissa [Provision practices of powered mobility devices in Finnish hospital districts]. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Labour and Welfare service. Statistics produced by the department of assistive technology NAV. Available from: NAV Oslo: Norway; 2010
   Google Scholar
• European Commission [EU]. Access to assistive technology in the European Union. 2003 [cited 2004 Sept]; European Commission, social security and social integration; Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/disability/assistive_technology_study_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nordic Cooperation on Disability. Provision of Assistive Technology in the Nordic Countries. Solna: Nordic cooperation on disability issues (NSH); 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Houben PPJ. Changing housing for elderly people and co-ordination issues in Europe. Housing Studies 2001;16:651–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hvinden B. Nordic disability policies in a changing Europe: Is there still a distinct model? Soc Poli Admin 2004;38:179–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt A, Löfqvist C, Jónsdottir I, Sund T, Salminen AL, Werngren-Elgström M, Iwarsson S. Towards an instrument targeting mobility-related participation: Nordic cross-national reliability. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:766–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization [WHO]. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin AE. Research Design in Clinical Psychology, Fourth Edn. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Lövdén M, Ghisletta P, Lindenberger U. Social participation attenuates decline in perceptual speed in old and very old age. Psychol Aging 2005;20:423–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Model of Human Occupation: Theory and application. Fourth Edn. Lippincott: Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Mollenkopf H, Baas S, Marcellini F, Oswald F, Ruoppila I, Szeman Z et al. A new concept of out-of-home mobility. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsick EM, Guralnik JM, Volpato S, Balfour J, Fried LP. Just get out the door! Importance of walking outside the home for maintaining mobility: Findings from the women’s health and aging study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:198–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auger C, Demers L, Gélinas I, Miller WC, Jutai JW, Noreau L. Life-space mobility of middle-aged and older adults at various stages of usage of power mobility devices. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:765–773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans S, Frank AO, Neophytou C, de Souza L. Older adults’ use of, and satisfaction with, electric powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs. Age Ageing 2007;36:431–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans S, Neophytou C, de Souza L, Frank AO. Young people’s experiences using electric powered indoor - outdoor wheelchairs (EPIOCs): Potential for enhancing users’ development? Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1281–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton MP. Competence, environmental press, and the adaptation of older people. In: Lawton MP, Windley PG, Byerts TO, (eds). Aging and Environment: Theoretical Approaches. New York: Springer; 1982. pp 33–59.
   Google Scholar
• Wessels RD, de Witte LP, Jedeloo S, van den Heuvel WP, van den Heuvel WJ. Effectiveness of provision of outdoor mobility services and devices in The Netherlands. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:371–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agree EM, Freedman VA, Sengupta M. Factors influencing the use of mobility technology in community-based long-term care. J Aging Health 2004;16:267–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware J, Snow K, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Boston (Mass)7 The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1993.
   Google Scholar