Evaluation of methods for teaching electronic visual scanning to children with cerebral palsy: two series of case studies

References

• Beukelman D, Mirenda P. Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Treviranus J, Roberts V. Supporting competent motor control of AAC systems. In: Light J, Beukelman D, Reichle J, editors. Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 2003. pp 199–240.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen K, Reichle J, Johnston SS. Examining preschoolers’ performance in linear and row-column scanning techniques. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2000;16:27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Horn EM, Jones HA. Comparison of two selection techniques used in augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun 1996;12:23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliff A. Comparison of relative demands implicated in direct selection and scanning: Considerations for normal children. Augment Altern Commun 1994;10:67–74.
   Google Scholar
• Horn E, Jones HA, Hamlett C. An investigation of the feasibility of a video game system for developing scanning and selection skills. J Assoc Pers Sev Handicaps 1991;16(2):108–115.
   Google Scholar
• Light J. Teaching automatic linear scanning for computer access: A case study of a preschooler with severe physical and communication disabilities. J Spec Educ Tech 1993;12:125–134.
   Google Scholar
• Mustonen T, Locke P, Reichle J, Solbrack M, Lindgren A. An overview of augmentative and alternative communication. In: Reichle J, York J, Sigafoos J, editors. Implementing augmentative and alternative communication: Strategies for learners with severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes. pp 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Lesar S. Use of assistive technology with young children with disabilities: Current status and training needs. J Early Intervention 1998;21(2):146–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemer-Reiss ML, Wacker RR. Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. J Rehabil 2000;66:44–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light J. Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augment Altern Commun 1989;5:137–144.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell PH, Milbourne S, Dugan LM, Wilcox MJ. A review of evidence on practices for teaching young children to use assistive technology devices. Top Early Child Spec Educ 2006;26:3–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones J, Stewart H. A description of how three occupational therapists train children in using the scanning access technique. Aust Occup Ther J 2004;51:155–165.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy J, Light J, Drager K, McNaughton D, Grodzicki L, Jones J, Panek E, Parkin E. Re-designing scanning to reduce learning demands: the performance of typically developing 2-year-olds. Augment Altern Commun 2006;22:269–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piché L, Reichle J. Teaching scanning selection techniques. In: Reichle J, York J, Sigafoos J, editors. Implementing augmentative and alternative communication: Strategies for learners with severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes;1991. pp 257–274.
   Google Scholar
• Case R. A developmentally based theory and technology of instruction. Rev Educ Res 1978;48:439–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis ES, Worthington LA. Research synthesis on effective teaching principles and the design of quality tools for educators. Technical Report No. 5 produced for the National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators, University of Oregon: Eugene, OR; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• McEwen I. Writing case reports: A how-to manual for clinicians. 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo J. Comparison of three computer scanning modes as an interface method for persons with cerebral palsy. Am J Occup Ther 1992;46(2):217–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulsen A, Rodger S, Ziviani JM. Understanding children’s motivation from a self-determination theoretical perspective: Implications for practice. Aust Occup Ther J 2006;53:78–86.
   Google Scholar
• Mechling L. Comparison of the effects of three approaches on the frequency of stimulus activations, via a single switch, by students with profound intellectual disabilities. J Spec Educ 2006;40(2):94–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar