Cognitive assistive technology and professional support in everyday life for adults with ADHD

References

• Adler LA, Spencer TJ, Levine LR, et al. Functional outcomes in the treatment of adults with ADHD. J Attent Disord 2008;11:720–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooij S, Bejerot S, Blackwell A, et al. European consensus statement on diagnosis and treatment of adult ADHD: the European Network Adult ADHD. BMC Psychiatry 2010;10:67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rösler M, Retz W, Thome J, et al. Psychopathological rating scales for diagnostic use in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2006;256:i3–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkley R, Edwards G, Laneri M, et al. Executive functioning, temporal discounting and sense of time in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). J Abnormal Child Psychol 2001;29:541–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia C, Bau C, Silva K, et al. The burdened life of adults with ADHD: impairment beyond comorbidity. Eur Psychiatry 2012;27:309–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccio CA, Wolfe M, Davis B, et al. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: manifestation in adulthood. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2005;20:249–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bejerholm U, Eklund M. Time use and occupational performance among person with schizophrenia. Occup Ther Mental Health 2004;20:27–47
   Google Scholar
• Valko L, Schneider G, Doehnert M, et al. Time processing in children and adults with ADHD. J Neural Trans 2010;117:1213–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LoPresti F, Mihailidis A, Kirsch N. Assistive technology for cognitive rehabilitation: state of the art. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2004;14:5–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disablity and Health: Children and Youth version. ICF-CY. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Arthanat S, Nochajski SM, Stone J. The international classification of functioning, disability and health and its application to cognitive disorders. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:235–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emilsson B, Gudjonsson G, Sigurdsson J, et al. Cognitive behaviour therapy in medication-treated adults with ADHD and persistent symptoms: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 2011;11:116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goksøyr PK, Nøttestad JA. The burden of untreated ADHD among adults: the role of stimulant medication. Addict Behav 2008;33:342–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattos P, Louzã MR, Palmini ALF, et al. A multicenter, open-label trial to evaluate the quality of life in adults with ADHD treated with long-acting methylphenidate (OROS MPH): Concerta Quality of Life (CONQoL) Study. J Attent Disord 2012. DOI: 10.1177/1087054711434772 [Epub 14 Feb 2012]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mick E, Faraone SV, Spencer T, et al. Assessing the validity of the quality of life enjoyment and satisfaction questionnaire – short form in adults with ADHD. J Attent Disord 2008;11:504–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Lidström H, Nygård L. Use of assisitve technology devices in mainstream schools: students’ perspective. Am J Occup Ther 2009;63:463–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biederman J, Faraone S, Spencer T, et al. Functional impairments in adults with self-reports of diagnosed ADHD: a controlled study of 1001 adults in the community. J Clin Pshychiatry 2006;67:524–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halmöy A, Fasmer O, Gillberg C, Haavik J. Occupational outcome in adult ADHD: impact of symptom profile, comorbid psychiatric problems, and treatment. A cross-sectional study of 414 clinically diagnosed adult ADHD patients. J Attent Disord 2009;13:175–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Act (1982:763) of Health and Medical Services (HSL) [in Swedish]; 1982
   Google Scholar
• Lilja M, Månsson I, Jahlenius L, Sacco-Peterson M. Disability policy in Sweden: Policies concerning assistive technology and home modification services. J Disabil Policy Stud 2003;14:130–5
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie A, Best C, O’Neill B. Cognitive function and assistive technology for cognition: a systematic review. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012;18:1–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer M. Assessing the benefits of using assistive technologies and other supports for thinking, remembering and learning. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:731–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Joode E, van Heugten C, Verhey F, van Boxtel M. Efficacy and usability of assistive technology for patients with cognitive deficits: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2010;24:701–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang I-C, Sugden D, Beveridge S. Assistive devices and cerebral palsy: factors influencing the use of assistive devices at home by children with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev 2008;35:130–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krantz O. Assistive devices utilisation in activities of everyday life – a proposed framework of understanding a user perspective. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2012;7:189–98
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis C. Simplicity in cognitive assistive technology: a framework and agenda for research. Univ Access Inf Soc 2007;5:351–61
   Google Scholar
• Eftring H. The useworthiness of robots for people with physical disabilities [doctoral dissertation]. Lund: Lund University; 1999
   Google Scholar
• de Joode EA, van Boxtel MPJ, Verhey FR, van Heugten CM. Use of assistive technology in cognitive rehabilitation: exploratory studies of the opinions and expectations of healthcare professionals and potential users. Brain Inj 2012;26:1257–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Craddock G, Mackeogh T. The relationship of personal factors and subjective well-being to the use of assistive technology devices. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:811–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Model of human occupation – theory and application. 4th ed. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Codex. Rules and Guidelines for Research. Stockholm: The Swedish Research Council; 2010. Available from: http://www.codex.vr.se/en/index.shtml [last accessed 29 Nov 2010]
   Google Scholar
• Fisher A. Assessment of motor and process skills. 4th ed. Fort Collins (CO): Three Star Press; 2001
   Google Scholar
• McNulty MC, Fisher AG. Validity of using the assessment of motor and process skills to estimate overall home safety in persons with psychiatric conditions. Am J Occup Ther 2001;55:649–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson E, Zemke R. Shaping the temporal patterns of our lives: the social coordination of occupation. J Occup Sci 2003;10:80–9
   Google Scholar
• Blomquist U-B, Hammarskiöld G. Vägar till hjälpmedel och samhällsstöd för personer med funktionshinder. Vällingby: Hjälpmedelsinstitutet; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Öhman A, Nygård L, Kottorp A. Occupational performance and awareness of disability in mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Scand J Occup Ther 2011;18:133–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Item analyses of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology. Assist Technol 2000;12:96–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Wessels R, Weiss-Lambrou R, et al. An international content validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST). Occup Ther Int 1999;6:159–75
   Google Scholar
• Weiss-Lambrou R. Satisfaction and comfort. In: Scherer M, ed. Assistive technology: matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation. Washingtom, DC: American Psychological Association; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Samuelsson K. Quest 2.0 – ett utvärderingsinstrument för hjälpmedel (QUEST 2.0 – an assessment for technical devices, in Swedish). Sweden: The Swedish Institute of Assistive Technology; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Eklund M. Satisfaction with daily occupations: a tool for client evaluation in mental health care. Scand J Occup Ther 2004;11:136–42
   Google Scholar
• Lindstedt H, Söderlund A, Stålenheim G, Sjödén P-O. Mentally disordered offenders’ abilities in occupational performance and social participation. Scand J Occup Ther 2004;11:118–27
   Google Scholar
• Hansson L, Svensson B, Björkman T. Quality of life of the mentally ill. Reliability of the Swedish version of the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile. Eur J Psychiatry 1998;13:231–4
   Google Scholar
• Lindstedt H, Grann M, Söderlund A. Mentally disordered offenders’ daily occupations after one year of forensic care. Scand J Occup Ther 2011;18:302–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN. Assistive products for persons with disability – classification and terminology (EN ISO 9999:2011). Brussels: European Committee for Standardization/Swedish Standards Insitute, SIS; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Sauer AL, Parks A, Heyn PC. Assistive technology effects on the employment outcomes for people with cognitive disabilities: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2010;5:377–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holwerda A, Groothoff JW, de Boer MR, et al. Work-ability assessment in young adults with disabilities applying for disability benefits. Disabil Rehabil 2012;Early online: 1–8 . DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2012.702846, ISSN 1464-5165 (online)
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch N, Scherer M. Assistive technology for cognition and behavior. In: Frank R, Rosenthal M, Caplan B. eds. Handbook of rehabilitation psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2010:273–84
   Google Scholar
• Vreeland B, Minsky S, Gara MA, et al. Solutions for wellness: results of a manualized psychoeducational program for adults with psychiatric disorders. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil 2010;13:55–72
   Google Scholar
• Mosey A. Psychosocial components of occupational therapy. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1986
   Google Scholar
• Bernd T, van der Pijl D, de Witte L. Existing models and instruments for the selection of assistive technology in rehabilitation practice. Scand J Occup Ther 2009;16:146–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins R, Nistico H. Maintaining life satisfaction: the role of positive cognitive bias. J Happiness Stud 2002;3:37–69
   Google Scholar