Haptic perception of users with low vision and their needs in haptic-incorporated user interfaces

References

• National Institute of Health. Vision problems in the U.S.: prevalence of adult vision impairment and age-related eye disease in America; 2002. Available from: http://www.preventblindness.net/site/DocServer/VPUS_2008_update.pdf?docID=1561 [last accessed 15 May 2010]
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Visual impairment and blindness; 2011. Available from: www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs282/en/# [last accessed 15 May 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Mroczka MA. Effects of study modality and study order on learning braille and other haptic alphabets used by blind persons [dissertation]. Raleigh (NC): North Carolina State University; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Yu W, Brewster S. Evaluation of multimodal graphs for blind people. Univers Access Inform Soc 2003;2:105–24
   Google Scholar
• Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol RESNA 1993;5:36–45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodman G, Tiene D, Luft P. Adoption of assistive technology for computer access among college students with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:80–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppestad BS. Inadequacies in computer access using assistive technology devices in profoundly disabled individuals: an overview of the current literature. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:189–99
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riemer-Reiss ML, Wacker RR. Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. J Rehabil 2000;66:44–50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjelland HV, Tangeland K. User-centered design proposals for prototyping haptic user interfaces. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2007;4813:110–20
   Google Scholar
• Frost Sullivan Research Service. Advances in haptics and touch technology (D1F8-01-00-00-00); 2010. Available from: http://www.frost.com [last accessed 28 Jan 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Carew S. Touch-screen gadgets alienate blind. New York: Reuters; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Public Law 103-218. Technology-related assistance for individuals with disabilities act amendments of 1994. The United States Department of Justice; 1994
   Google Scholar
• Riemer-Reiss M. Assistive technology discontinuance. CSUN 2000 Conference Proceedings 2000. Available from: http://www.csun.edu/cod/conf/2000/proceedings/0003Reimer.htm [last accessed 28 Jan 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Riemer-Reiss M. Assistive technology use and abandonment among college students with disabilities. Int Electr J Leadership Learn 1999;3. Available from: http://people.ucalgary.ca/~huartson/iejll/volume3/riemer.html [last accessed 30 Jan 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Kim HN. Usable accessibility and haptic user interface design approach [dissertation]. Blacksburg (VA): Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Douglas SA, Willson S. Haptic comparison of size (relative magnitude) in blind and sighted people. Proceedings of the 9th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. New York (NY): ACM; 2007:83–90
   Google Scholar
• Evans S, Douglas G. E-learning and blindness: a comparative study of the quality of an E-learning experience. J Visual Impairment Blindness 2008;102:77–88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck R. Dialogue in participatory design. Design Studies 2003;24:523–35
   Google Scholar
• Plimmer B, Crossan A, Brewster SA, Blagojevic R. Multimodal collaborative handwriting training for visually-impaired people. Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York (NY): ACM; 2008:393–402
   Google Scholar
• Blanco F, Travieso D. Haptic exploration and mental estimation of distances on a fictitious island: from mind’s eye to mind’s hand. J Visual Impairment Blindness 2003;97:298–300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosslyn S, Ball TM, Reiser BJ. Visual images perserve metric spatial information: evidence from studies of image scanning. J Exp Psychol Human Percep Perform 1978;4:47–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurniawan SH, Sutcliffe AG. Mental models of blind users in the windows environment. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2002;2398:568–74
   Google Scholar
• Gregory RL. Knowledge in perception and illusion. Philos Trans R Soc London B Biol Sci 1997;352:1121–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carneiro MM, VelhoL. Assistive interfaces for the visually impaired using force feedback devices and distance transforms. Inform Technol Disabil E-Journal 2004;10. Available from: http://easi.cc/itd/volume10/number2/carneiro.html [last accessed 28 Jan 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Cornoldi C, Vecchi T. Mental imagery in blind people: the role of passive and active visuospatial processes. In: Heller MA, ed. Touch, representation, and blindness. NY: Oxford University; 2000:143–81
   Google Scholar
• Azari NP, Seitz RJ. Brain plasticity and recovery from stroke. Am Scientist 2000;88:426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert S, Sampaio E, Mauss Y, Scheiber C. Blindness and brain plasticity: contribution of mental imagery? Cogn Brain Res 2004;20:1–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sadato N, Pascual-Leone A, Grafman J, et al. Activation of primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects. Nature 1996;380:526–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen TL, Babiloni C, Ferretti A, et al. Human secondary somatosensory cortex is involved in the processing of somatosensory rare stimuli: an fMRI study. NeuroImage 2008;40:1765–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton H, Snyder AZ, Conturo TE, et al. Adaptive changes in early and late blind: a fMRI study of Braille reading. J Neurophysiol 2002;87:589–607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jednorog K, Grabowska A. Behavioral manifestations of brain plasticity in blind and low-vision individuals. Acta Neurobiol Exp 2008;68:83–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadosh RC, Walsh V. Cognitive neuroscience: rewired or crosswired brains? Curr Biol 2006;16:962–3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grouios G, Alevriadou A, Koidou I. Weight-discrimination sensitivity in congenitally blind and sighted adults. J Visual Impairment Blindness 2001;95:30–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira FCMB, Quek F, Cowan H, Fang B. The haptic deictic system – HDS: bringing blind students to mainstream classrooms. IEEE Trans Haptics 2012;5:172–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paneels S, Roberts JC. Review of designs for haptic data visualization. IEEE Trans Haptics 2010;3:119–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard D, Jouffrais C, Lebaz S. Haptic recognition of emotions in raised-line drawings by congenitally blind and sighted adults. IEEE Trans Haptics 2011;4:67–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantala J, Raisamo R, Lylykangas J, et al. Methods for presenting Braille characters on a mobile device with a touchscreen and tactile feedback. IEEE Trans Haptics 2009;2:28–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin GN. Human neuropsychology. Vol. 2. New York (NY): Prentice Hall; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Yi DJ, Kelley TA, Marois R, et al. Attentional modulation of repetition attenuation is anatomically dissociable for scenes and faces. Brain Res 2006;1080:53–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffman HR. Sensation and perception: an integrated approach. Vol. 5. New York: Wiley; 2000
   Google Scholar
• Chambers Iv E, Wolf BM. Sensory testing methods (American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM Manual). West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 1996
   Google Scholar
• Gescheider GA. Psychophysics: the fundamentals. Lahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1997
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann TW, Kappers A. Analysis of haptic perception of materials by multidimensional scaling and physical measurements of roughness and compressibility. Acta Psychol 2006;121:1–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann Tiest WM, Kappers AML. Haptic and visual perception of roughness. Acta Psychol 2007;124:177–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond J, Lawless HT. Context effects and reference standards with magnitude estimation and the labeled magnitude scale. J Sensory Stud 2001;16:1–10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verrillo RT, Bolanowski SJ, McGlone FP. Subjective magnitude of tactile roughness. Somatosensory Motor Res 1999;16:352–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman S, Taylor M. Fingertip force, surface geometry, and the perception of roughness by active touch. Attention Percept Psychophys 1972;12:401–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altinsoy ME, Merchel S. Electrotactile feedback for handheld devices with touch screen and simulation of roughness. IEEE Trans Haptics 2012;5:6–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens SS. Issues in psychophysical measurement. Psychol Rev 1971;78:426–50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor C, Hsiao S, Phillips J, et al. Tactile roughness: neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates. J Neurosci 1990;10:3823–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HN, Smith-Jackson T, Bøhn JH. Younger and older adults with low vision have similar haptic capabilities and needs in 3D virtual navigation. Gerontechnology 2011;10:72–89
   Google Scholar
• Kitada R, Sadato N, Lederman SJ. Tactile perception of nonpainful unpleasantness in relation to perceived roughness: effects of inter-element spacing and speed of relative motion of rigid 2-D raised-dot patterns at two body loci. Perception 2012;41:204–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL. Sensing and displaying spatially distributed fingertip forces in haptic interfaces for teleoperator and virtual environment systems. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ 1999;8:86–103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL, Hamilton CL, et al. Perceiving roughness via a rigid probe: psychophysical effects of exploration speed and mode of touch. Haptics-e 1999;1:1--20
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki Y, Gyoba J, Sakamoto S. Selective effects of auditory stimuli on tactile roughness perception. Brain Res 2008;1242:87–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. ISO 11056: Sensory analysis – methodology – magnitude estimation method. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 1999
   Google Scholar
• Marshall MN. Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice 1996;13:522–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Magnitude and causes of visual impairment; 2008. Available from: www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs282/en/ [last accessed 8 Feb 2012]
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. ISO 6344: Coated abrasives – grain size analysis. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Falkenstein I, Cochran D, Azen S, et al. Comparison of visual acuity in macular degeneration patients measured with snellen and early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts. Opthalmology 2007;115:319–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL. Hand movements: a window into haptic object recognition. Cogn Psychol 1987;19:342–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawilowsky SS. Nonparametric tests of interaction in experimental design. Rev Educ Res 1990;60:91–126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulin D. Effects of the use of raised line drawings on blind people's cognition. Eur J Special Needs Educ 2007;22:341–53
   Google Scholar
• Mullan Z. Taxi-driving induces plasticity in adult brain structures. Lancet 2000;355:993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahncke H, Bronstone A, Merzenich MM. Brain plasticity and functional losses in the aged: scientific bases for a novel intervention. Progr Brain Res 2006;157:81–109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller M. PICTIVE – an exploration in participatory design. CHI '91: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York (NY): ACM; 1991:225–31
   Google Scholar
• Ramloll R, Yu W, Brewster S, et al. Constructing sonified haptic line graphs for the bling student: first steps. Proceedings of the Fourth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies. New York (NY): ACM; 2000:17–25
   Google Scholar
• Kostopoulos K, Moustakas K, Tzovaras D, et al. Haptic access to conventional 2D maps for the visually impaired. J Multimodal User Interfaces 2007;1:13–19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesbitt KV. A framework to support the designers of haptic, visual and auditory displays. Proceedings of GOTHI-05 Guidelines on Tactile and Haptic Interactions. Saskatchewan: University of Saskatchewan; 2005:54–63
   Google Scholar