Experiences of adults with complex communication needs receiving and using low tech AAC: an Australian context

References

• American Speech-Language Hearing Association. Report: augmentative and alternative communication. Asha 1991;33:9–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iacono T, Lyon K, West D. Non-electronic communication aids for people with complex communication needs. Int J Speech-Language Pathol 2011;13:399–410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda P. Toward a functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism: manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Lang Speech Hear Serv Schools 2003;34:203–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson KM, Hennig S. The state of research and practice in augmentative and alternative communication for children with developmental/intellectual disabilities. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2007;13:58–69
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodge S. Why is the potential of augmentative and alternative communication not being realized? Exploring the experiences of people who use communication aids. Disabil Soc 2007;22:457–71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackstone S. Ten US funding programs. Augment Commun News 2006;18:1–8
   Google Scholar
• Hamm B, Mirenda P. Post-school quality of life for individuals with developmental disabilities who use AAC. Augment Altern Commun 2006;22:134–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacono T. The evidence base in augmentative and alternative communication. In: Reilly S, Perry A, Douglas J, eds. Evidence-based practice in speech pathology. London: Wiley; 2004:288–313
   Google Scholar
• Ball L, Beukelman D, Pattee G. Acceptance of augmentative and alternative communication technology by persons with amyotropic lateral sclerosis. Augment Altern Commun 2004;20:113–22
   Google Scholar
• Blom Johansson M, Carlsson M, Sonnander K. Communication difficulties and the use of communication strategies: from the perspectives of adults with aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2012;47:144–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy J. “I prefer contact this close”: perceptions of AAC by people with motor neurone disease and their communication partners. Augment Altern Commun 2004;20:259–71
   Google Scholar
• Johnson J, Inglebret E, Jones C, Ray J. Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augment Altern Commun 2006;22:85–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda P. Toward functional augmentative and alternative communication options for students with autism: manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Lang Speech Hear Serv Schools 2003;34:203–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland D, Gillon G, Yoder D. AAC use and serivce provision: a survey of New Zealand speech-language therapists. Augment Altern Commun 2005;21:295–307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siu E, Tam E, Sin D, et al. A survey of augmentative and alternative communication service provision in Hong Kong. Augment Altern Commun 2010;26:289–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wormnaes S, Abdel Malek T. Egyptian speech therapists want more knowledge about augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun 2004;20:30–41
   Google Scholar
• Johnson H, Douglas J, Bigby C, Iacono T. Maximising community inclusion through mainstream communication services for adults with severe disabilities. Int J Speech-Language Pathol 2009;11:180–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund SK, Light J. Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: part III – contributing factors. Augment Altern Commun 2007;23:323–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West D, Johnson H, Lyon K, Iacono T. Outcomes of the non-electronic communication aids scheme (NECAS) for adults with communication difficulties. Full Report. Melbourne: Scope; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Dattilo J, Estrella G, Estrella L, et al. “I have chosen to live life abundantly”: perceptions of leisure by adults who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun 2008;24:16–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton D, Rackensberger T, Benedek-Wood E, et al. “A child needs to be given a chance to success”: parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies. Augment Altern Commun 2008;24:43–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rackensberger T, Krezman C, McNaughton D, et al. “When I first got it, I wanted to throw it off the cliff”: the challenges and benefits of learning AAC technologies as described by adults with use AAC. Augment Altern Commun 2005;21:165–86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101
   Google Scholar
• Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. Sydney: Oxford University Press; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Miles M, Huberman A. Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1994
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications Inc.; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman DR, Fager S, Ball L, Dietz A. AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: a review. Augment Altern Commun 2007;23:230–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda P, Brown K. A picture is worth a thousand words: using visual supports for augmented input with individuals with autism. In: Mirenda P, Iacono T, eds. Autism and AAC. Baltimore (MD): Paul H. Brookes; 2009:303–32
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman DR, Ball LJ, Fager S. An AAC personal framework: adults with acquired complex communication needs. Augment Altern Commun 2008;24:255–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball LJ, Beukelman DR, Anderson E, et al. Duration of AAC technology use by persons with ALS. J Med Speech Lang Pathol 2007;15:371–81
   Google Scholar
• Light J. Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augment Altern Commun 1989;5:137–44
   Google Scholar
• Ballin L, Balandin S. An exploration of loneliness: communication and social networks of older people with cerebral palsy. J Intellect Dev Disabil 2007;32:315–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith M. The dual challenges of aided communication and adolescence. Augment Altern Commun 2005;21:67–79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blockberger S, Armstrong R, O’Connor A, Freeman R. Children’s attitudes toward a nonspeaking child using various augmentative and alternative communication techniques. Augment Altern Commun 1993;9:243–50
   Google Scholar
• Gorenflo C, Gorenflo D, Santer S. Effects of synthetic voice output on attitudes toward the augmented communicator. J Speech Hear Res 1994;37:64–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beukelman D, Mirenda P. Augmentative and alternative communication: supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. Baltimore (MD): Paul H. Brookes; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Scope. Too little too late: wait times and cost burden for people with a disability in seeking equipment funding in Victoria. Melbourne: Scope (Vic); 2006
   Google Scholar
• Hodge S. Why is the potential of augmentative and alternative communication not being realized? Exploring the experiences of people who use communication aids. Disabil Soc 2007;22:457–71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald R, Harris E, Price K, Jolleff N. Elation or frustration? Outcomes following the provision of equipment during the Communication Aids Project: data from one CAP partner centre. Child Care Health Dev 2008;34:223–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar