Field testing of two electronic mobility aid devices for persons who are deaf-blind

References

• Roentgen UR, Gelderblom GJ, Soede M, de Witte LP. Inventory of electronic mobility aids for persons with visual impairments: a literature review. J Vis Impair Blind 2008;102:702–24
   Google Scholar
• Roentgen UR, Gelderblom GJ, Soede M, de Witte LP. The impact of electronic mobility devices for persons who are visually impaired: a systematic review of effects and effectiveness. J Vis Impair Blind 2009;103:743–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumsack JT. Audiological assessment, rehabilitation, and spatial hearing considerations associated with visual impairment in adults: an overview. Am J Audiol 2003;12:76–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kricos PB. Hearing assistive technology considerations for older individuals with dual sensory loss. Trends Amplif 2007;11:273–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monroe S, Waters C, Owen M. Une étude démographique sur les personnes sourdes-aveugles au Canada et les services à leur disposition. In: Société Nationale Canadienne des Sourds-Aveugles [Canadian National Society of the Deafblind]; 2005:178 pp
   Google Scholar
• Munroe S. La création d’un registre national et volontaire des personnes atteintes de surdicécité au Canada: résultats de l’étude menée de 1999 à 2001. In: Watters C, Owen M, eds. Association canadienne de la surdicécité et de la rubéole [Canadian Deafblind and Rubella Association]. Winnipeg, MA, Canada: Canadian Centre on Disability Studies; 2001. Available from: http://www.cdbanational.com/PDFs/Demographic%20Study%20(French).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boughman JA, Vernon M, Shaver KA. Usher syndrome: definition and estimate of prevalence from two high-risk populations. J Chronic Dis 1983;36:595–603
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grondahl J. Estimation of prognosis and prevalence of retinitis pigmentosa and Usher syndrome in Norway. Clin Genet 1987;31:255–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope CI, Bundey S, Proops D, Fielder AR. Usher syndrome in the city of Birmingham – prevalence and clinical classification. Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:46–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spandau UH, Rohrschneider K. Prevalence and geographical distribution of Usher syndrome in Germany. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002;240:495–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan CCH, Lee TMC. Validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Occ Ther Int 1997;4:231–49
   Google Scholar
• Cup EH, Scholte op Reimer WJ, Thijssen MC, van Kuyk-Minis MA. Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:402–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Wessels RD, Weiss-Lambrou R, et al. An international content validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST). Occ Ther Int 1999;6:159–75
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): an overview and recent progress. Technol Disabil 2002;14:101–5
   Google Scholar
• Fontana A, Frey JH. The interview: from structured questions to negotiated text. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. The handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousands Oaks (CA): Sage; 2000:645--72
   Google Scholar
• Baker C, Wuest J, Stern PN. Method slurring: the grounded theory/phenomenology example. J Adv Nurs 1992;17:1355–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills M. Human science research in public health: the contribution and assessment of a qualitative approach. Can J Public Health 2000;91:I-4–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carpenter C, Suto M. Qualitative research for occupational and physical therapists: a practical guide. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1985
   Google Scholar
• Krefting L. Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. Am J Occup Ther 1991;45:214–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer R, Saint-Jacques M-C. Le questionnaire. In: Mayer R, Ouellet F, Saint-Jacques M-C, Turcotte D, eds. Méthodes de recherche en intervention sociale. Montréal, QC: Gaétan Morin; 2000:22 pp
   Google Scholar
• Mucchielli A. Dictionnaire des méthodes qualitatives en sciences humaines et sociales. Paris, France: Armand Colin; 1996
   Google Scholar
• Koelen MA, Vaandrager L, Colomer C. Health promotion research: dilemmas and challenges. J Epidemiol Community Health 2001;55:257–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter DR. Triangulation as a qualitative research strategy. In: Streubert HJ, Carpenter DR, eds.Qualitative research in nursing: advancing the humanistic imperative. 3rd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott; 2003;349–60
   Google Scholar
• Ma MY, Wu FG, Chang RH. A new design approach of user-centered design on a personal assistive bathing device for hemiplegia. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1077–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehle C, Albrecht-Buehler C. Developing more desirable products for stroke survivors. Top Stroke Rehabil 2008;15:109–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar