Powered wheelchairs and scooters for outdoor mobility: a pilot study on costs and benefits

References

• The National Board of Health and Welfare. Available from: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/english [last accessed 18 Oct 2012]
   Google Scholar
• The Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. Health and Medical Service Act; 1982:763
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Institute of Assistive Technology. Available from: http://www.hi.se/en/Assistive-technology-in-Sweden/ [last accessed 18 Oct 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Krantz O. Assistive devices utilisation in activities of everyday life – a proposed framework of understanding a user perspective. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2012;7:189–98
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brandt Å, Iwarsson S, Ståhle A. Older people’s use of powered wheelchairs for activity and participation. J Rehabil Med 2004;36:70–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards K, McCluskey A. A survey of adult power wheelchair and scooter users. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2010;5:411–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Auger C, Demers L, Gélinas I, et al. Life-space mobility of middle-aged and older adults at various stages of usage of power mobility devices. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:765–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfqvist C, Pettersson C, Iwarsson S, Brandt Å. Mobility and mobility-related participation outcomes of powered wheelchair and scooter interventions after 4-months and 1-year use. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2012;7:211–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pettersson I, Törnquist K, Ahlström G. The effect of an outdoor powered wheelchair on activity and participation in users with stroke. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2006;1:235–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rousseau-Harrison K, Rochette A, Routhier F, et al. Perceived impacts of a first wheelchair on social participation. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2012;7:37–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reid D, Laliberte-Rudman D, Hebert D. Impact of wheeled seated mobility devices on adult users’ and their caregivers’ occupational performance: a critical literature review. Can J Occup Ther 2002;69:261–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salminen A-L, Brandt A, Samuelsson K, et al. Mobility devices to promote activity and participation: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:697–706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprigle S, Lenker J, Searcy K. Activities of suppliers and technicians during the provision of complex and standard wheeled mobility devices. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2012;7:219–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greer N, Brasure M, Wilt TJ. Wheeled mobility (wheelchair) service delivery: scope of the evidence. Ann Intern Med 2012;156:141–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagberg L, Hemansson L, Fredriksson C, Pettersson I. The value of electric powered wheelchairs – project report [in Swedish] 2012 http://hi.se
   Google Scholar
• Samuelsson K, Töytari O, Salminen A-L, Brandt Å. Effects of lower limb prosthesis on activity, participation, and quality of life: a systematic review. Prosthet Orthot Int 2012;36:145–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwarsson S. Towards an instrument targeting mobility-related participation: Nordic cross-national reliability. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:766–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Development of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST). Assist Technol 1996;8:3–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sibley A, Kersten P, Ward CD, et al. Measuring autonomy in disabled people: validation of a new scale in a UK population. Clin Rehabil 2006;20:793–803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijcks B, Wessels R, De Vlieger S, Post M. KWASO, a new instrument to assess the quality of service delivery in assistive technology provision. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:909–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The EuroQol Group. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsson K, Wressle E. User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices – an important element in the rehabilitation process. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:551–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Sax C, Vanbiervliet A, et al. Predictors of assistive technology use: the importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:1321–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. Matching person & technology. Webster, New York: The Institute for Matching Person & Technology, Inc.; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Davies A, De Souza LH, Frank AO. Changes in the quality of life in severely disabled people following provision of powered indoor/outdoor chairs. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:286–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountain AD, Kirby RL, Eskes GA, et al. Ability of people with stroke to learn powered wheelchair skills: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:596–601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day H, Jutai J, Campbell KA. Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: lessons learned and the road ahead. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:31–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar