What factors are associated with the provision of assistive technologies: the Bogotá D.C. case

References

• Borg J, Lindström A, Larsson S. Assistive technology in developing countries: national and international responsibilities to implement the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Lancet 2009;347:1863–5
   Google Scholar
• Bernd T, Van Der Pijl D, De Witte L. Existing models and instruments for the selection of assistive technology in rehabilitation practice. Scand J Occupat Therap 2009;16:146–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant RB, Pedrotty BD, Shish M, Seok S. Assistive technology and supports provision: a selective review of the literature and proposed areas of application. Exceptionality 2010;18:203–13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg J, Lindström A, Larsson S. Assistive technology in developing countries: a review from the perspective of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Prosthet Orthot Int 2011;35:20–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenker JA, Harris F, Taugher M, Smith RO. Consumer perspectives on assistive technology outcomes. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2013;8:373–80
   Google Scholar
• Borg J, Larsson S, Ostergren PO, et al. Assistive technology use and human rights enjoyment: a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh. BMC Int Health Human Rights 2012;12:Article no. 18
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard LH, Vogel B, Hoenig H, et al. Cost, utilization, and policy of provision of assistive technology devices to veterans poststroke by Medicare and VA. Med Care 2010;48:558–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henschke C. Provision and financing of assistive technology devices in Germany: a bureaucratic odyssey? The case of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Health Pol 2012;105:176–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard S, Fitzgerald S, Reker D, et al. Demographic characterisitics of veterans who received wheelchairs and scooters from Veterans Health Administration. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006;43:831–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard S, Cowper D, Wu S, et al. Demographic and clinical variation in veterans health administration provision of assistive technology devices to veterans poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:369–77
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karmarkar AM, Dicianno BE, Graham JE, et al. Factors associated with provision of wheelchairs in older adults. Assist Technol 2012;24:155–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferds A, Beyene N, Upadhyay N, et al. Current state of mobility technology provision in less-resourced countries. Phys Med Rehabil Clin 2010;21:221–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shore S. Use of an economical wheelchair in India and Peru: impact on health and function. Med Sci Monit 2008;14:71–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Republica de Colombia. Ley 100 (Act 100). [Internet]. 1993. Available from: http://www.colombia.com/actualidad/images/2008/leyes/ley100.pdf [last accessed 31 Jan 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Republica de Colombia. Acuerdo 008. [Internet]. Bogotá (D.C.); 2009. Available from: http://www.alcaldiabogota.gov.co/sisjur/normas/Norma1.jsp?i=38488 [last accessed 30 Jan 2013]
   Google Scholar
• República de Colombia. Documento Conpes Social 80 “POLÍTICA PÚBLICA NACIONAL DE DISCAPACIDAD”. Legislation. Bogotá: Consejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social; 2004. Available from: https://www.dnp.gov.co/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=RP3j04bd9AM%3D&tabid=342
   Google Scholar
• DANE. Resultados preliminares de la implementación del registro para la localización y caracterización de las personas con discapacidad Bogotá. Bogotá: DANE - MinEducacion. Available from: http://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/discapacidad/Bogota%20SEPT%202007.pdf [last accessed 29 Apr 2007]
   Google Scholar
• Rios A, Laserna R, Melo R, et al. Tecnología y Discapacidad. Informe Final. Implementación de la Política Sectorial en Salud para la Prevención y Manejo de la Discapacidad en Bogotá. Convenio SDS-UR 1004/2005. Bogotá: Unpublished research report; 2007 SDS - Universidad del Rosario
   Google Scholar
• Ríos Rincón A, Laserna R, Melo R, Vargas M. Lineamientos para el otorgamiento de ayudas técnicas. Bancos de Ayudas Técnicas (BAT) de la Secretaria Distrital de Salud Bogotá D.C. Bogotá D.C.: Secretaria Distrital de Salud Bogotá D.C.; 2007. Available from: http://www.yumpu.com/es/document/view/7927455/lineamientos-para-el-otorgamiento-de-ayudas-tecnicas-secretaria
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh FY. Sample size tables for logistic regression. Statistic Med 1989;8:795–802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitemore AS. Sample size for logistic regression with small response probability. J Am Statist Assoc 1981;76:27–32
   Google Scholar
• Hosmer W, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2000
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. International Standard ISO 9999: 2006 Assistive products for persons with disability - classification and terminology. 4th ed. Geneva: ISO Copyright Office; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Cook AM, Polgar JM. Cook and Hussey's assistive technologies. Principles and practice. St. Louis (MO): Mosby Elselvier; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Secretaria Distrital de Salud de Bogotá D.C. Lineamientos Tecnicos de Discapacidad (Technical guidelines for disability). Bogotá, D.C.: Secretaria Distrital de Salud de Bogotá D.C.; 2008. Available from: http://www.saludcapital.gov.co/Documentos%20Discapacitados/Lineamientos%20discapacidad/Transversalidad%20Discapacidad_2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• WHO. International Diseases Classification (ICD-10) version 2010. [Internet]; 2010. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/ [last accessed 20 Jan 2013]
   Google Scholar
• WHO. The International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH). Geneva: WHO; 1980
   Google Scholar
• Republica de Colombia. Documento Conpes 3386. [Internet]. 2005. Available from: http://www.dane.gov.co/files/dig/CONPES_3386_oct2005_Focaliz_subsidios_servicios_publicos.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Congreso de Colombia. Ley 142 de 1994. [Internet]. Bogotá D.C. 1994. Available from: http://www.alcaldiabogota.gov.co/sisjur/normas/Norma1.jsp?i=2752 [last accessed 13 Jan 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Burger H, Marinček Č, Jaeger R. Prosthetic device provision to landmine survivors in Bosnia and Herzegovina: outcomes in 3 ethnic groups. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:19–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• May-Teerink T. A survey of rehabilitative services and people coping with physical disabilities in Uganda, East Africa. Int J Rehabil Res 1999;22:311–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva F, Quintero C, Zarruk JG. Comportamiento epidemiológico de la enfermedad cerebrovascular en la población colombiana. [Internet]. Bucaramanga; 2012. Available from: http://www.acnweb.org/es/guia-neurologica/guia-8-ecv/322-comportamiento-epidemiologico-de-la-enfermedad-cerebrovascular-en-la-poblacion-colombiana.html [last accessed 7 May 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Agree EM, Freedman VA, Sengupta M. Factors influencing the use of mobility technology in community-based long-term care. J Aging Health 2004;16:267–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcaldia Mayor de Bogotá. Act 619. Plan de Ordenamiento Territorial para Santa Fe de Bogotá, Distrito Capital. [Internet]; 2000. Available from: http://www.alcaldiabogota.gov.co/sisjur/normas/Norma1.jsp?i=3769 [last accessed 31 Jan 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Biddis EA, Chau TT. Multivariate prediction of upper limb prosthesis acceptance or rejection. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2008;3:181–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd ed. NY: Taylor and Francis Group; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald SG, Reker D. Assessment of the National prosthetics patient database: preliminary studies of validity. Pittsburgh (PA): Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Barnard J, Meng XL. Applications of multiple imputations in medical studies: from AIDS to NHANES. Stat Methods Med Res 1999;8:17–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch HW. Imputation methods for missing categorical questionnaire data: a comparison of approaches. J Data Sci 2010;8:361–78
   Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum DG, Klein M. Logistic regression a self-learning text. 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Le Roux B, Rouanet H. Geometric data analysis, from correspondence analysis to structured data analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Andersson C, Mattsson E. Adults with cerebral palsy: a survey describing problems, needs, and resources, with special emphasis on locomotion. Dev Med Child Neurol 2001;43:76–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waisel DB. Vulnerable populations in healthcare (Review). Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2013;26:186–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartfai A, Boman IL. Policies concerning assistive technology and home modifications services for people with physical and cognitive disabilities in Sweden. NeuroRehabilitation 2011;28:303–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petterson D, Murray G. Ethics and assistive technology service provision. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2006;1:59–67
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook A. Ethical issues related to the use/non-use of assisitive technologies. Dev Disabil Bull 2009;37:127–52
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum M. Frontiers of justice: disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge (MA): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Perera I, Ekanayake L. Conventional versus asset approaches: comparative appraisal of socioeconomic indicators for oral health research among adolescents in a developing country. Asia-Pasific J Publ Health 2010;24:407–14
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee G, Samanta A. Wheelchair charity: a useless benevolence in community-based rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:591–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderbroucke JP, Elm EV, Altman DG, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE). Epidemiology 2007;18:805–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar