Living with an electric wheelchair – the user perspective

References

• United Nations. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. United Nations Secretariat for the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; 2006
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Vol. iv. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock AA. An occupational perspective of health. Thorofare: Slack Incorporated; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford GE, Pereira RB. Occupation, inclusion and participation. In: Whiteford GE, Hocking C, editors. Occupational science: society, inclusion, participation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012: 185--207
   Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, et al. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:1445–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M. Participation in the occupations of everyday life. Am J Occup Ther 2002;56:640–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalvey BT, Owsley C, Sloane ME, Ball K. The life space questionnaire: a measure of the extent of mobility of older adults. J Appl Gerontol 1999;18:460–78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell T. Towards a politics of mobility. Environ Plan D 2010;28:17–31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frontera WR. DeLisa's physical medicine & rehabilitation: principles and practice. Philadephia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010
   Google Scholar
• O'Young B, Young MA, Stiens SA. Physical medicine and rehabilitation secrets. Philadephia: Hanley & Belfus; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Gayle G, Davis G, Pohlman R, Glaser R. Track wheelchair ergometry: effects of handrim diameter on metabolic responses. Adapted physical activity. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 1990
   Google Scholar
• Masse L, Lamontagne M, O'riain M. Biomechanical analysis of wheelchair propulsion for various seating positions. J Rehabil Res Dev 1991;29:12–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okawa H, Tajima F, Makino K, et al. Kinetic factors determining wheelchair propulsion in marathon racers with paraplegia. Spinal Cord 1999;37:542--7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates PS, Spencer JC, Young ME, Rintala DH. Assistive technology and the newly disabled adult: adaptation to wheelchair use. Am J Occup Ther 1993;47:1014–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill SE, Eggleston R. Managing emotions in public: the case of wheelchair users. Soc Psychol Q 1994;57:300–12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin LN, Luborsky MR, Schemm RL. Emerging concerns of older stroke patients about assistive device use. Gerontologist 1998;38:169–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson KA, Bedini LA, Hecht L. ‘Not just a wheelchair, not just a woman’: self-identity and leisure. Ther Recreation J 1994;28:73–86
   Google Scholar
• Miles-Tapping C, MacDonald LJ. Lifestyle implications of power mobility. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 1995;12:31–49
   Google Scholar
• Hebert D, Rudman D, Reid D. Wheelchair use and occupational performance: stroke survivors' and caregivers' perspectives. The Canadian Seating and Mobility Conference; 2000; Toronto, Ontario, Canada
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson-Pell M. Jay Medical Lectureship: seating and wheeled mobility research – the key to our future. Eleventh International Seating Symposium; 1995; Pittsburgh, PA
   Google Scholar
• York J. Mobility methods selected for use in home and community environments. Phys Ther 1989;69:736–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pluym SM, Keur TJ, Gerritsen J, Post MW. Community integration of wheelchair-bound athletes: a comparison before and after onset of disability. Clin Rehabil 1997;11:227–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somers MF, Garant A. Addressing the unique mobility requirements of parenting from a wheelchair: case report. J Neurol Phys Ther 1993;17:11–13
   Google Scholar
• Reid D, Laliberte-Rudman D, Hebert D. Impact of wheeled seated mobility devices on adult users' and their caregivers' occupational performance: a critical literature review. Can J Occup Ther 2002;69:261–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strauss AL, Corbin JM. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Winance M. Pain, disability and rehabilitation practices. A phenomenological perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1109–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winance M. Trying out the wheelchair. The Mutual shaping of people and devices through adjustment. Sci Technol Hum Values 2006;31:52–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty M. Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Blach Rossen C, Sørensen B, Würtz Jochumsen B, Wind G. Everyday life for users of electric wheelchairs – a qualitative interview study. Disabil Rehabil 2012;7:399--407
   Google Scholar
• Strauss AL. Mirrors & masks: the search for identity. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers; 1997
   Google Scholar
• Hjelle KM, Vik K. The ups and downs of social participation: experiences of wheelchair users in Norway. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:2479–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillen AM, Söderberg S. Disabled persons' experience of dependence on assistive devices. Scand J Occup Ther 2002;9:176--183
   Google Scholar
• Watson N. Well, I know this is going to sound very strange to you, but i don't see myself as a disabled person. Identity Disabil, Disabil Soc 2002;17:509–27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead GH. Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago press; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Stephens MAP, Kinney JM, McNeer AE. Accommodative housing: social integration of residents with physical limitations. Gerontologist 1986;26:176–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiles BL. Benevolence as deviant behavior: a test of the sympathy effect. Deviant Behav 1995;16:81–92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viemerö V. The effects of somatic disability or progressive illness on psychological and social well-being. Psychother Psychosom 1991;55:120–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg N. Social equity and the physically disabled. Soc Work 1983;28:365–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme JB, Poor R, Schulein M, Pezzino J. Perceived behavioral changes observed with adaptive seating devices and training programs for multihandicapped, developmentally disabled individuals. Phys Ther 1983;63:204–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohan M, Faulkner W. Masculinities and technologies: some introductory remarks. Men Masculinities 2004;6:319–29
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn C. The circuit of technology: gender, identity and power. In R. Silverstone, E. Hirsch, editors. Consuming technologies. London: Routledge; 1992: 33--42
   Google Scholar
• Ravneberg B. Identity politics by design: users, markets and the public service provision for assistive technology in Norway. Scand J Disabil Res 2009;11:101–15
   Google Scholar
• Hjälpmedelsinstitutet. Statistik om hjälpmedel för förflyttning och kognition. Inköpskostnader och förskrivningar. Hjälpmedelsinsitutet; 2010. Report nr 11349-pdf. 39 p
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson C, Iwarsson S, Brandt Å, et al. Men's and women's perspectives on using a powered mobility device: benefits and societal challenges. Scand J Occup Ther 2014;74:1–9
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Dicowden MA. Organizing future research and intervention efforts on the impact and effects of gender differences on disability and rehabilitation: the usefulness of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:161–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton D, Seymour W. Technology, selfhood and physical disability. Soc Sci Med 2000;50:1851–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krantz O, Persson D. The experience of active wheelchair provision and aspects of importance concerning the wheelchair among experienced wheelchair users in Sweden. Rev Disabil Stud 2011;7:21–37
   Google Scholar
• Pörn I. Health and adaptedness. Theor Med 1993;14:295–303
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fristedt S. Occupational participation through community mobility among older men and women [dissertation]. School of health sciences (HHJ): Jönköping University; 2012. 123 p
   Google Scholar
• Shirado O, Shundo M, Kaneda K, Strax TE. Outdoor winter activities of spinal cord-injured patients: with special reference to outdoor mobility. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995;74:408–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siösteen A, Lundqvist C, Blomstrand C, et al. The quality of life of three functional spinal cord injury subgroups in a Swedish community. Spinal Cord 1990;28:476–88
   Google Scholar
• Foucault M. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Random House LLC: Brighton, Harvester; 1980
   Google Scholar
• Office Swedish Government [Internet]. En strategi för genomförande av funktionshinderpolitiken 2011--2016 (A strategy for implementing disability policies 2011--2016). Available from: http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/14025/a/171269 [last accessed 05 Mar 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Barnes C, Mercer G. Implementing the social model of disability: theory and research. Leeds: Disability Press; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Pierce LL. Barriers to access: frustrations of people who use a wheelchair for full-time mobility. Rehabil Nurs 1998;23:120–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Essén A, Östlund B. Laggards as innovators?. Old users as designers of new services & service systems. Int J Design 2011;5:89–98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capire/HCM. 2013 Design av tjänster inom hälsa, vård och omsorg – en kunskapsöversikt. Stiftelsen Svensk Industridesign (Swedish Industrial Design Foundation). Available from: http://www.svid.se/kunskapsoversikt2013 [last accessed 15 Sep 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Eikhaug O, Rådet for Industridesign (Norway), innovation for all programme. Innovating with people: the business of inclusive design. Oslo: Norwegian Design Council; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Sanders EB-N, Stappers PJ. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design 2008;4:5–18
   Google Scholar
• Biggs S. Toward critical narrativity: stories of aging in contemporary social policy. J Aging Stud 2001;15:303–16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holstein JA, Gubrium JF. Constructionist perspectives on the life course. Soc Compass 2007;1:335–52
   Google Scholar