Measurement properties of the Wheelchair Skills Test – Questionnaire for powered wheelchair users^*

References

• Brault MW. Americans with disabilities: 2010. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Flagg JF. Industry profile on wheeled mobility. University at Buffalo: Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Technology Transfer; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Löfqvist C, Pettersson C, Iwarsson S, Brandt A. Mobility and mobility-related participation outcomes of powered wheelchair and scooter interventions after 4-months and 1-year use. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2012;7:211–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards K, McCluskey A. A survey of adult power wheelchair and scooter users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2010;5:411–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frank AO, Neophytou C, Frank J, De Souza L. Electric-powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs (EPIOCs): users’ views of influence on family, friends and carers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2010;5:327–38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans S, Frank AO, Neophytou C, DeSouza L. Older adults’ use of, and satisfaction with, electric powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs. Age Ageing 2007;36:431–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank AO, Ward J, Orwell NJ, et al. Introduction of a new NHS electric-powered indoor/outdoor chair (EPIOC) service: benefits, risks and implications for prescribers. Clin Rehabil 2000;14:665–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang H, Chany A-M, Smith, GA. Wheelchair related injuries treated in US emergency departments. Inj Prev 2006;12:8–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby RL, Ackroyd-Stolarz SA. Wheelchair safety: adverse reports to the United States Food and Drug Administration. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995;74:308–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Hurd Clarke L, Best K. Prescribers’ experiences with powered mobility prescription among older adults. Am J Occup Ther 2013;67:100–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Guidelines on the provision of manual wheelchairs in less resourced settings. Geneva: WHO Press; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Eggers SL, Myaskovsky L, Burkitt KH, et al. A preliminary model of wheelchair service delivery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:1030–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountain AD, Kirby RL, Eskes GA, et al. Ability of people with stroke to learn powered wheelchair skills: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:596–601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountain A, Kirby RL, Smith C, et al. Powered wheelchair skills training for persons with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, in press
   Google Scholar
• Kirby RL, Smith C, Parker K, et al. Wheelchair skills program general introduction. Available from: http://www.wheelchairskillsprogram.ca/eng/documents/WSP_General_Introduction_2013-04-17.pdf [last accessed 2 Dec 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Kirby RL, Smith C, Parker K, et al. Wheelchair skills test version 4.1 manual. Available from: http://www.wheelchairskillsprogram.ca/eng/documents/WST_Manual_version_4.1.60.pdf [last accessed 2 Dec 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Kirby RL, Swuste J, Dupuis DJ, et al. The Wheelchair Skills Test: a pilot study of a new outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:10–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby RL, Dupuis DJ, MacPhee AH, et al. The wheelchair skills test (version 2.4): measurement properties. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:794–804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Routhier F, Demers L, Kirby RL, et al. Inter–rater and test–retest reliability of the French-Canadian Wheelchair Skills Test (version 3.2): preliminary findings. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of RESNA; 2007 June 15–19; Phoenix, AZ
   Google Scholar
• Lindquist NJ, Loudon PE, Magis TF, et al. Reliability of the Wheelchair Skills Test (WST) version 4.1 for manual wheelchair users. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:1752–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton PW, Kirby RL, Miller WC. Manual wheelchair skills: objective testing versus subjective questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012;93:2313–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountain AD, Kirby RL, Smith C. The Wheelchair Skills Test, version 2.4: validity of an algorithm-based questionnaire version. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:416–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton AM, Kirby RL, MacPhee AH, et al. Evaluation of manual wheelchair skills: is objective testing necessary or would subjective estimates suffice? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1295–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby RL, Smith C, Parker K, et al. Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire Manual Version 4.2. Available from: http://www.wheelchairskillsprogram.ca/eng/documents/WST-Q_Manual_Version_4.2.4.pdf [last accessed 2 Dec 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-hall Inc.; 2000
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Baker PS, Bodner EV, Allman RM. Measuring life-space mobility in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003;51:1610–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auger C, Demers l, Gelinas I, et al. Life-space mobility of middle-aged and older adults at various stages of usage of power mobility devices. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:765–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton PW, Demers L, Miller WC, CanWheel Research Team. Measurement properties of the Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale for Power Wheelchair Users (WheelCon-P). Proceedings of the 41st Annual Scientific and Educational Meeting of the Canadian Association on Gerontology; 2012, Oct 18–20; Vancouver, British Columbia
   Google Scholar
• Rushton PW, Miller WC, Kirby RL, Eng JJ. Measure for the assessment of confidence with manual wheelchair use (WheelCon-M): reliability and validity. J Rehabil Med 2013;45:61–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:S15–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domholdt E. Physical therapy research: principles and applications. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2000
   Google Scholar
• Beckerman H, Roebroeck ME, Lankhorst GJ, et al. Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res 2001;10:571–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturk A, Ucsular FD. Effectiveness of a wheelchair skills training programme for community-living users of manual wheelchairs in Turkey: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2011;25:416–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best KL, Kirby RL, Smith C, MacLeod DA. Wheelchair skills training for community-based manual wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:2316–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coolen AL, Kirby RL, Landry J, et al. Wheelchair skills training program for clinicians: a randomized controlled trial with occupational therapy students. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1160–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacPhee AH, Kirby RL, Coolen AL, Smith C. Wheelchair skills training program: a randomized clinical trial of wheelchair users undergoing initial rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:41–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Routhier F, Kirby RL, Demers L, et al. Efficacy and retention of the French-Canadian version of the Wheelchair Skills Training Program for manual wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012;93:940–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemay V, Routhier F, Noreau L, et al. Relationships between wheelchair skills, wheelchair mobility and level of injury in individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2012;50:37–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smidt N, van der Windt DA, Assendelft WJ, et al. Interobserver reproducibility of the assessment of severity of complaints, grip strength, and pressure pain threshold in patients with lateral epicondylitis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1145–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar