The impact of mobility assistive technology devices on participation for individuals with disabilities

References

• Erickson W, Lee C, von Schrader S. 2012 Disability status report: United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Employment and Disability Institute (EDI); 2012. Available from: http://www.disabilitystatistics.org [last accessed 12 Aug 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Brault M. Americans with disabilities: 2010. Current population reports. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau; 2012:70–131
   Google Scholar
• LaPlante M, Kaye S. Demographics and trends in wheeled mobility equipment use and accessibility in the community. Assist Technol 2010;22:3–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan R, Fregly B, Boninger M, et al. Recent trends in assistive technology for mobility. J NeuroEng Rehabil 2012;9:1–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook A, Polgar J. Cook & Hussey's assistive technologies: principles and practice. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Chaves E, Boninger M, Cooper R, et al. Assessing the influence of wheelchair technology on perception of participation in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1854–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt P, Boninger M, Cooper R, et al. Demographic and socioeconomic factors associated with disparity in wheelchair customizability among people with traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1859–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer M, Glueckauf R. Assessing the benefits of assistive technologies for activities and participation. Rehabil Psychol 2005;50:132–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jutai J, Day H. Psychosocial impact of assistive devices (PIADS). Technol Disabil 2002;14:107–11
   Google Scholar
• Kaye H, Kang T, LaPlante P. Mobility device use in the United States. Disability statistics report (14). Washington, DC: US Dept. Education, NIDRR; 2000:1–60
   Google Scholar
• Gray D, Quatrano L, Lieberman M. Conclusions: moving to the next stage of assistive technology development. In: Gray D, Quatrano L, Lieberman M, eds. Designing and using assistive technology: the human perspective. Baltimore, MD: Brookes; 1998:299–310
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson M, Hammel J. Providing alternative financing for assistive technology. J Disabil Stud 2003;14:109–18
   Google Scholar
• Mills T, Holm M, Schmeler M. Test–retest reliability and cross validation of the functioning everyday with a wheelchair instrument. Assist Technol 2007;19:61–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Schmeler M, Karmarkar A, et al. Test–retest reliability of the functional mobility assessment (FMA): a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2013;8:213–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barker D, Reid D, Cott C. The experience of senior stroke survivors: factors in community participation among wheelchair users. Can J Occup Ther 2006;73:18–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoenig H, Giacobbi P, Levy C. Methodological challenges confronting researchers of wheeled mobility aids and other assistive technologies. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:159–68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Groot S, Post M, Bongers-Janssen H, et al. Is manual wheelchair satisfaction related to active lifestyle and participation in people with a spinal cord injury? Spinal Cord 2011;49:560–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz B, Bowers B. Understanding how disability is defined and conceptualized in the literature. Rehabil Nurs 2003;28:74–8
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Rethinking disability and what to do about it: disability studies and its implications for occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther 2005;59:487–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Kyung A. Meaning of life for adolescents with a physical disability in Korea. J Adv Nurs 2003;43:145–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcmillen A, Soderberg S. Disabled persons' experiences of dependence on assistive devices. Scand J Occup Ther 2002;9:176–83
   Google Scholar
• Charlton J. Nothing about us without us: disability, oppression, and empowerment. Ipswich, MA: University of California Press; 1998
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO) ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability And Health. Geneva: WHO; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Scherer M. Living in the state of stuck: how technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Scherer M. Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. Disabil Rehabil 1996;18:439–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRRTS. Outcome measures project. March 2011. Available from: http://www.nrrts.org/LiteratureRetrieve.aspx?ID=83699
   Google Scholar
• Badke M, Di Fabio R, Leonard E, et al. Reliability of a functional mobility assessment tool with application to neurologically impaired patients: a preliminary report. Physiother Can 1993:45;15–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graham H, Harvey A, Rodda J, et al. The functional mobility scale. J Pediatr Orthop 2004;24:514–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiedemann A, Shimada H, Sherrington C, et al. The comparative ability of eight functional mobility tests for predicting falls in community dwelling older people. Age Ageing 2008;37:430–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SurveyMonkey. HIPAA Compliance and SurveyMonkey. 2014. Available from: http://help.surveymonkey.com/articles/en_US/kb/HIPAA-Compliance-and-SurveyMonkey [last accessed 13 Aug 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Abilities expo: Fostering the capabilities of the differently-abled. 2013. Available from: http://www.abilitiesexpo.com/about.html [last accessed 9 Aug 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Disabled World. 2013 International Seating Symposium (ISS) Nashville, TN. 2013. Available from: http://www.disabledworld.com/news/events/2013/nashville.php [last accessed 12 Aug 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Arva J, Schmeler M, Lange M, et al. RESNA position on the application of seat-elevating devices for wheelchair users. Assist Technol 2009;21:69–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. Standard rules on the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities. New York: United Nations; 1993
   Google Scholar
• Sanford J, Pynoos J, Tejral A, Browne A. Development of a comprehensive assessment for delivery of home modifications. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 2002;20:43–55
   Google Scholar
• Schultz-Krohn W, Pendelton H. (eds). Pedretti's occupational therapy practice skills for physical dysfunction. 7th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby; 2013
   Google Scholar