Important wheelchair skills for new manual wheelchair users: health care professional and wheelchair user perspectives

References

• National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. University of Alabama. 2013 Annual Statistical Report – Complete Public Version. Available from: https://www.nscisc.uab.edu/reports.aspx [last accessed 15 Jan 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Kaye HS, Kang T, LaPlante MP. Wheelchair use in the United States [abstract]. Disabil Stat Abstr 2002;23:1–4
   Google Scholar
• LaPlante MP, Kaye HS. Demographics and trends in wheeled mobility equipment use and accessibility in the community. Assist Technol 2010;22:3–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilkens OJ, Dallmeijer AJ, de Witte LP, et al. The wheelchair circuit: construct validity and responsiveness of a test to assess manual wheelchair mobility in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;8:424–31
   Google Scholar
• Best KL, Miller WC, Routhier F. A description of manual wheelchair skills training curriculum in entry-to-practice occupational and physical therapy programs in Canada. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2014 . [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.907368
   Google Scholar
• MacPhee AH, Kirby RL, Coolen AL, et al. Wheelchair skills training program: a randomized clinical trial of wheelchair users undergoing initial rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:41–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öztürk A, Ucsular FD. Effectiveness of a wheelchair skills training programme for community-living users of manual wheelchairs in Turkey: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2001;25:416–24
   Google Scholar
• Kilkens OJ, Post MW, Dallmeijer AJ, et al. Relationship between manual wheelchair skill performance and participation of persons with spinal cord injuries 1 year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005;42:65–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boninger ML, Souza A, Cooper RA, et al. Propulsion patterns and pushrim biomechanics in manual wheelchair propulsion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:718–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor S, Gassaway J, Heisler-Varriale LA, et al. Patterns in wheeled mobility skills training, equipment evaluation, and utilization: findings from the SCIRehab Project. Assist Technol 2015;7:59–68
   Google Scholar
• Kendall MB, Ungerer G, Dorsett P. Bridging the gap: transitional rehabilitation services for people with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:1008–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNevin NH, Wulf G, Carlson C. Effects of attentional focus, self-control, and dyad training on motor learning: implications for physical rehabilitation. Phys Ther 2000;80:373–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fliess-Douer O, Vanlandewijck YC, Manor GL, Van Der Woude LH. A systematic review of wheelchair skills tests for manual wheelchair users with a spinal cord injury: towards a standardized outcome measure. Clin Rehabil 2010;44:501–18
   Google Scholar
• Axelson P, Chesney DY, Minkel J, Perr A. The manual wheelchair training guide. Santa Cruz (CA): Pax Press; 1996
   Google Scholar
• Kirby RL, Dupuis DJ, MacPhee AH, et al. The wheelchair skills test (version 2. 4): measurement properties. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:794–804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines (CSCM). Preservation of upper limb function following spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals. Washington, DC: Paralyzed Veterans of America; 2005
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Üstün TB, Chatterji S, Bickenbach J, et al. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a new tool for understanding disability and health. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:565–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen M, Cieza A, Stamm TA, et al. Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for rheumatoid arthritis from the patient perspective using focus groups. Arthritis Res Ther 2006;8:R84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray DB, Hollingsworth HH, Stark SL, Morgan KA. Participation survey/mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:189–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray DB, Hollingsworth HH, Stark S, Morgan KA. A subjective measure of environmental facilitators and barriers to participation for people with mobility limitations. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:434–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelsma J. Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a literature survey. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:1–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchberger I, Sinnott A, Charlifue S, et al. Functioning and disability in spinal cord injury from the consumer perspective: an international qualitative study using focus groups and the ICF. Spinal Cord 2010;48:603–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauch A, Fekete C, Cieza A, et al. Participation in physical activity in persons with spinal cord injury: a comprehensive perspective and insights into gender differences. Disabil Health J 2013;6:165–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck GG, Harrison-Felix CL, Mellick DC, et al. Quantifying environmental factors: a measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1324–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Kirchberger I, Biering-Sørensen F, et al. ICF core sets for individuals with spinal cord injury in the long-term context. Spinal Cord 2010;48:305–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidmar G. ICF core sets. Int J Rehabil Res 2013;36:93–4
   Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, et al. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:1445–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Kroll T, Barbour R, Harris J. Using focus groups in disability research. Qual Health Res 2007;17:690–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 2007;62:107–15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White MD, Marsh EE. Content analysis: a flexible methodology. Libr Trends 2006;55:1–45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, et al. Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med 2002;34:205–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:212–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Microsoft. Microsoft Excel (computer software). Redmond (WA): Microsoft; 2011
   Google Scholar
• SPSS Inc. SPSS statistics version 21. Chicago (IL): IBM; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Using qualitative research to inform the client-centred evidence-based practice of occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther 2001;64:228–34
   Google Scholar
• Kilkens OJ, Post MW, Dallmeijer AJ, et al. Wheelchair skills tests: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:418–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coolen AL, Kirby RL, Landry J, et al. Wheelchair skills training program for clinicians: a randomized controlled trial with occupational therapy students. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1160–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesbrecht EM, Wilson N, Schneider A, et al. Preliminary evidence to support a “boot camp” approach to wheelchair skills training for clinicians. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015;96:1158–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómara-Toldrà N, Sliwinski M, Dijkers MP. Physical therapy after spinal cord injury: a systematic review of treatments focused on participation. J Spinal Cord Med 2014;37:371–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacson M. Best practices by occupational and physical therapists performing seating and mobility evaluations. Assist Technol 2011;23:13–21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell M, Jin BT, Kim AJ, et al. METTA: a tablet-based platform for monitored at-home training as demonstrated through the EPIC wheels Wheelchair Skills Training Program. Proceedings of the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America Conference. Vancouver: University of British Columbia; 2014
   Google Scholar
• Post MW, de Witte LP, van Asbeck FW, et al. Predictors of health status and life satisfaction in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:395–401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sand Å, Karlberg I, Kreuter M. Spinal cord injured persons' conceptions of hospital care, rehabilitation, and a new life situation. Scand J Occup Ther 2006;13:183–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ditunno JF Jr, Formal CS. Chronic spinal cord injury. New Engl J Med 1994;330:550–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen R, Tresse S, Gunnarsson RK. Fewer accidents and better maintenance with active wheelchair check-ups: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:631–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biering-Sørensen F, Scheuringer M, Baumberger M, et al. Developing core sets for persons with spinal cord injuries based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a way to specify functioning. Spinal Cord 2006;44:541–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner WA, Ryser L, Huber E, et al. Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Phys Ther 2002;82:1098–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette AM, Haley SM, Kooyoomjian JT. Are the ICF activity and participation dimensions distinct? J Rehabil Med 2003;35:145–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Miller WC, Miller-Pogar J. Measuring wheelchair intervention outcomes: development of the Wheelchair Outcome Measure. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:275–85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perenboom RJ, Chorus AM. Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:577–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass TA. Conjugating the “tenses” of function: discordance among hypothetical, experimental, and enacted function in older adults. Gerontologist 1998;38:101–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby RL, Swuste J, Dupuis DJ, et al. The Wheelchair Skills Test: a pilot study of a new outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:10–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICF Core Sets for individuals with spinal cord injury in the long-term context. Spinal Cord 2010;48:305–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cott C. Client-centred rehabilitation: client perspectives. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:1411–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar