References
- Aceros JC, Pols J, Domènech M. Where is grandma? Home telecare, good aging and the domestication of later life. Technol Forecasting Social Change 2015;93:102–11
- Alftberg Å, Lundin S. ‘Successful Ageing’in practice: reflections on health, activity and normality in old age in sweden. Cult Unbound J Curr Cult Res 2012;4:481–96
- Bayer S, Barlow J, Curry R. Assessing the impact of a care innovation: telecare. Syst Dyn Rev 2007;23:61–80
- Brownsell S, Blackburn S, Hawley MS. An evaluation of second and third generation telecare services in older people's housing. J Telemed Telecare 2008;14:8–12
- Milligan C, Roberts C, Mort M. Telecare and older people: who cares where? Soc Sci Med 2011;72:347–54
- Oudshoorn N. Telecare technologies and the transformation of healthcare. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011
- Peine A, Herrmann AM. The sources of use knowledge: towards integrating the dynamics of technology use and design in the articulation of societal challenges. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2012;79:1495–512
- Melander Wikman A. Definitioner och modeller för e-hälsa [Definitions and models for e-health]. In: Gard G, Wikman AM, eds. E-hälsa. Innovationer, metoder, interventioner och perspektiv [E-health. Innovations, methods, interventions and perspectives]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2012
- Battarbee K, Mattelmäki T, Ylirisku S, et al. Looking beyond the product: design research in industrial and academic collaboration. Proceedings of Joining Forces Conference. Helsinki: UIAH; 2005
- Cairns P, Cox AL. Research methods for human-computer interaction. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 2008
- Carroll JM. Making use: scenario-based design of human-computer interactions. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2000
- Gassmann O, Reepmeyer G. Universal design: innovations for all ages. In: Kohlbacher F, Herstatt C, eds. The Silver market phenomenon. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2011:101–16
- Lazar J, Feng JH, Hochheiser H. Research methods in human-computer interaction. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2009
- McCarthy J, Wright P. Technology as experience. Interactions 2004;11:42–3
- Koskinen I, Zimmerman J, Binder T, et al. Design research through practice: from the lab, field, and showroom. Waltham (MA): Morgan Kaufmann; 2011
- Löwgren J, Stolterman E. Thoughtful interaction design: a design perspective on information technology. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2004
- Östlund B. Silver age innovators: a new approach to old users. In: Kohlbacher F, Herstatt C, eds. The silver market phenomenon. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2011:15–26
- Rogers Y. HCI theory: classical, modern, and contemporary. Synth Lect Hum Center Inform 2012;5:1–129
- Connelly K, Mokhtari M, Falk TH. Approaches to Understanding the impact of technologies for aging in place: a mini-review. Gerontology 2014;60:282–8
- Fukuda R. Gerontechnology for a super-aged society. In: Kohlbacher F, Herstatt C, eds. The silver market phenomenon. Heidelberg: Springer; 2011:79–89
- Joyce K, Loe M. A sociological approach to ageing, technology and health. Sociol Health Illn 2010;32:171–80
- Joyce K, Loe M. Technogenarians: studying health and illness through an ageing, science, and technology lens. Vol. 11. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2011
- Kohlbacher F, Herstatt C. The silver market phenomenon: business opportunities in an era of demographic change. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2008
- Coradeschi S, Cesta A, Cortellessa G, et al. GiraffPlus: a system for monitoring activities and physiological parameters and promoting social interaction for elderly. Hum Comput Syst Interact Backgrounds Appl 2014;3:261–71
- Eurostat. Population structure and ageing. Availble from: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Population_structure_and_ageing [last accessed 1 Jul 2013]
- Flyvbjerg B. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qual Inq 2006;12:219
- Thomas G. How to do your case study: a guide for students and researchers. London, UK: Sage Publications Limited; 2010
- Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, UK: Pine Forge Press; 2006
- Belk R. Possessions and self. J Consum Res 1988;15:139–68
- McMillan SJ, Avery EJ, Macias W. From havenots to watch dogs: understanding internet health communication behaviors of online senior citizens. Inform Commun Soc 2008;11:675–97
- Turkle S. Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books; 2011
- Bijker WE. Social construction of technology. In: Pedersen SA, Olsen JKB, Hendricks VF, eds. A companion to the philosophy of technology. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2009:79–90
- Akrich M. The de-scription of technical objects. In: Bijker W, Law J, eds. Shaping technology, building society: studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1992:205–24
- Neven L, Maria B. Representations of the old and ageing in the design of the new and emerging: assessing the design of Ambient Intelligence technologies for older people. Netherlands: University of Twente; 2011
- Peine A, Rollwagen I, Neven L. The rise of the “innosumer” – rethinking older technology users. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2014;82:199–214
- Frennert S, Eftring H, Östlund B. What older people expect of robots: a mixed methods approach. Soc Robot 2013;8239:19–29
- Neven L. ‘But obviously not for me’: robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. Sociol Health Illn 2010;32:335–47
- Pestoff VA. Social enterprises and civil democracy in Sweden: developing a participatory welfare society in the twenty-first century. London: Macmillan; 1999