Assistive technologies for hearing, and speaking impaired people: a survey

References

• World Health Organization. World report on disability “The way forward: recommendations, chapter 9”. 2011. [cited 2015 May 3] Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/chapter9.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Centre on Human Policy. The right to health in Saudi Arabia ‘Right to health in the Middle East’ project, Law School, University of Aberdeen; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kbar G, Aly S, ElSharawy I, et al. Smart Help At The Workplace For Persons With Disabilities (Shw-Pwd), ICIES 2015: XIII International Conference on Intelligent Environments and Systems, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• AL-Rousan M, Assaleh K, Tala’a A. Video-based signer-independent Arabic sign language recognition using hidden Markov models. Appl Soft Comput. 2009;9:990–999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuvarani M, Vinothkumar S, Prabu R, et al. Shrug and Voice Recognition System For Dumb And Hearing Impards. Int J Res Advent Technol. 2009;2:36–39.
   Google Scholar
• Subha Rajam P, Balakrishnan G. Real time Indian sign language recognition system to aid deaf-dumb people. IEEE Trans Instrum Mesure 2011;58:2501–2506.
   Google Scholar
• Sangeetha K, Barathi Krishna L. Gesture detection for deaf and dumb people. Int J Dev Res. 2014;4:749–752.
   Google Scholar
• Misal PK, Pathan. MM. Design & implementation of ANFIS system for hand gesture to Devanagari conversion. Int J Eng Res Gen Sci 2014;2:207–212.
   Google Scholar
• Swaroop T. Wireless and uninstrumented communication by gestures for deaf and mute based on Wi-See technology. IOSR J Electron Commun Eng. 2013;7:31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Yella Reddy G, Ramana Reddy M. Design of ultrasonic spectacles, flex sensor based voice generation and speech to text (data) conversion techniques for physically disable people. Int J Res Electron Commun Eng. 2013;1: 12–22.
   Google Scholar
• Radha HG, Shruti SD. Design and development of an assistive device for speech and hearing impaired. Int J Innov Technol Res 2013;2:859–862.
   Google Scholar
• Atallah L, ElHelw M, Pansiot J, et al. Behaviour profiling with ambient and wearable sensing. 4th International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN 2007), Vol 13. Berlin: Springer;2007. p. 133–138.
   Google Scholar
• Brdiczka O, Reignier P,, Crowley JL. Detecting Individual Activities from Video in a Smart Home. 11th International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES), 2007. p. 363–370.
   Google Scholar
• Shirley BG, Thomas J, Roche P. VoIPText: Voice Chat for Deaf and Hard of Hearing People. In: Proceedings of 2012 IEEE Second International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Berlin (ICCE-Berlin), Berlin (Germany): IEEE; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Fajardo I, Canas JJ, Salmeron L, et al. Improving deaf users’ accessibility in hypertext information retrieval: are graphical interfaces useful for them? Behav Inform Technol. 2006;25:455–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottoni P, Borgia F, Buccarella D, et al. Stories and signs in an e-learning environment for deaf people. Univ Access Inform Soc. 2012;12:369–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halawani SM, Zaitun AB. An avatar based translation system from arabic speech to arabic sign language for deaf people. Int J Inform Sci Educ. 2012;2:13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Cox S, Lincoln M, Tryggvason J, et al. TESSA, a system to aid communication with deaf people. In: The proceedings of the fifth International ACM conference on ASSETS and SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. New York: ACM Press; 2002. p. 205–212.
   Google Scholar
• Offiah MC, Rosenthal S, Borschbach M. Assessing the utility of mobile applications with support for or as replacement of hearing aids. Proc Comput Sci 2014;34: 593–600.
   Google Scholar
• Punch Ŕe, Hyde M, Power D. Career and workplace experiences of australian university graduates who are deaf or hard of hearing. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2004;12: 504–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozuh I, Hintermair M, Ivanišin M, et al. The concept of examining the experiences of deaf and hard of hearing online user. Proc Comput Sci. 2013;27:148–157.
   Google Scholar
• Kim J, Nama KW, Yook S, et al. Effect of degree of sensorineural hearing impairment on the results of subjective evaluations of noise-reduction algorithm. Speech Commun. 2015;68:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan JR, Thibodeau LM, Assmann. PF. Auditory training of speech recognition with interrupted and continuous noise maskers by children with hearing impairment. J the Acoust Soc Am. 2012;133:495–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore BCJ. Speech processing for the hearing-impaired: successes, failures, and implications for speech mechanisms. Speech Commun. 2003;41:81–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Festen JM, et al. The influence of informational masking on speech perception and pupil response in adults with hearing impairment. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014;135:1596–1606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong R, Wang M, Yuan X-T, et al. Video accessibility enhancement for hearing-impaired users. ACM Trans Multimedia Comput Commun Appl. 2011;7:24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rekkedal AM. Assistive hearing technologies among students with hearing impairment: factors that promote satisfaction. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2012;17: 501–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanayakkara S, Wyse L, Taylor E. Enhancing musical experience for the hearing impaired using visual and haptic displays. Hum Comput Interact. 2013;28: 115–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanayakkara S, Wyse L, Taylor E. The Haptic Chair as a speech training aid for the deaf. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Melbourne, Australia; 2014. p. 405–410.
   Google Scholar
• Nanayakkara S, Wyse L, Taylor EA. Effectiveness of the haptic chair in speech training. 14th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, Austin, Texas, USA. 2012 p. 235–236.
   Google Scholar
• Padmanabhan V, Sornalatha M. Hand gesture recognition and voice conversion system for dumb people. Int J Sci Eng Res. 2014;5:427–431.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley MS, Cunningham SP, Green PD, et al. A voice-input voice-output communication aid for people with severe speech impairment. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2013;21. p. 23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajeswari K, Jeevitha E, Kalai Selvi VKG. “Virtual Voice” – the voice for the dumb. International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research, Coimbatore, India; 2010. p. 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Machacon HTC, Shiga S. Recognition of Japanese finger spelling gestures using neural networks. J Med Eng Technol. 2010;34:254–260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahmed SF, Ali SMB, Qureshi SM. Electronic speaking glove for speechless patients: a tongue to a dumb. The IEEE Conference on Sustainable Utilization and Development in Engineering and Technology, Selangor, Malaysia; 2010. p. 56–60.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatraman S, Padmavathi TV. Speech for the disabled. The International Multiconference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Hong Kong; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Roccetti M, Marfia G, Semeraro. A. Playing into the wild: a gesture-based interface for gaming in public spaces. J Vis Commun Image. 2012;23:426–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Inform Lib J. 2009;26:91–108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federici S, Scherer MJ. The assistive technology assessment model and basic definitions. In: Federici S, Scherer MJ, editors. Assistive technology assessment handbook. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2012. p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar