The use of speech generating devices in communication interventions for individuals with developmental disabilities: A review of the literature

References

• Harris SL. Your child's development. Children with autism: A parents’ guide, 2nd, MD Powers. Woodbine House, Inc., Bethesda, MD 2000; 155–180
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos J, Drasgow E. Conditional use of aided and unaided AAC: A review and clinical case demonstration. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities 2001; 16: 152–161
   Google Scholar
• Lord C, Rhea P. Language and communication in autism. Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders, 2nd, DV Cohen. John Wiley & sons, Inc, New York 1997; 195–225
   Google Scholar
• Siller M, Sigmnan M. The behaviors of parents of children with autism predict the subsequent development of their children's communication. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2002; 32: 77–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb M, Bornstein M, Teti D. Development in infancy: An introduction. , 4th. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ 2002
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos J, Arthur-Kelly M, Butterfield N. Enhancing everyday communication for children with disabilities. Paul H Brookes Publishing Co., Baltimore, MD 2006
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman DR, Mirenda P. Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore 1998
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser RW, Sigafoos J. Augmentative and alternative communication interventions for persons with developmental disabilities: Narrative review of comparative single-subject experimental studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2006; 27: 1–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser RW, Wendt O. Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2008; 17: 212–230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondy A, Frost L. The Picture Exchange Communication System: A training manual. Pyramid Educational Consultants, Newark 2002
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Cuvo AJ, Singh NN, Sigafoos J, Didden R. PECS and VOCAs to enable students with developmental disabilities to make requests: An overview of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2007; 28: 468–488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser R. Roles of speech output in augmentative and alternative communication: Narrative review. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2003; 19: 5–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drager K, Anderson J, Debarros J, Hayes E, Liebman J, Panek E. Speech synthesis in background noise: Effects of message formulation and visual information on the intelligibility of American English DECTalk™. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2007; 23: 177–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda P. Toward a functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism: Manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 2003; 34: 203–216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser RW, Lee DL. Promoting generalization and maintenance in augmentative and alternative communication: A meta-analysis of 20 years of effectiveness research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2000; 16: 208–226
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni G, O’Reilly M, Basili G. Use of microswitches and speech output systems with people with severe/profound intellectual or multiple disabilities: A literature review. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2001; 22: 21–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser RW, Blischak DM. Is there a role for speech output in interventions for persons with autism? A review. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 2001; 16: 170–178
   Google Scholar
• van der Meer LAJ, Rispoli MJ. Communication Interventions Involving Speech-Generating Devices for Children with Autism: A Review of the Literature. Developmental Neurorehabilitation 2010; 13: 294–306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski M, Sevcik R, Fonseca A. Augmentative and alternative communication for persons with mental retardation. International review of research in mental retardation: Language and communication in mental retardation, L Abbeduto. Academic Press, San Diego, CA 2003; 255–280
   Google Scholar
• Soderholm S, Meinander M, Alantra H. Augmentative and alternative communication methods in locked-in syndrome. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2001; 33: 235–239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar D, Light J, Schlosser R. The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: A research review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2006; 49: 248–264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser RW, Sigafoos J. Navigating evidence-based information sources in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative & Alternative Communication 2009; 25: 225–235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simeonsson RJ, Bailey DB. Family-focused intervention: Clinical, training, and research implications. Early intervention in transition: Current perspectives on programs for handicapped children, K Marfo. England: Praeger Publishers, New York 1991; 91–108
   Google Scholar
• Smith NL. The certainty of judgments in health evaluations. Evaluation and Program Planning 1981; 4: 273–278
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlosser RW, Sigafoos J. Evidence-based communication assessment and intervention—purpose and procedures. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention 2007; 1: 52–54
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy CH. Single-case designs for educational research. Pearson Education Inc., Boston 2005
   Google Scholar
• Adamsom LB, Romski MA, Deffebach K, Sevick RA. Symbol vocabulary and the focus of conversations: Augmenting language development for youth with mental retardation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1992; 35: 1333–1343
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheslock MA, Barton-Hulsey A, Romski M, Sevcik RA. Using a speech-generating device to enhance communicative abilities for an adult with moderate intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 2008; 46: 376–386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dattilo J, Camarata S. Facilitating conversation through self-initiated augmentative communication treatment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1991; 24: 369–378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand MV. Functional communication training using assistive devices: Recruiting natural communities of reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1999; 32: 247–267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyches TT, Davis A, Lucido BR, Young JR. Generalization of skills using pictographic and voice output communication devices. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2002; 18: 124–131
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Sigafoos J, Didden R, Oliva D, Campodonico F, de Pace C, Chiapparino C, Groeneweg J. Persons with multiple disabilities accessing stimulation and requesting social contact via microswitch and VOCA devices: New research evaluation and social validation. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2009; 30: 1084–1094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund SK, Light J. The effectiveness of grammar instruction for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication systems: A preliminary study. Journal of Speech Language & Hearing Research 2003; 46: 1110–1123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepis MM, Reid DH, Behrmann MM. Acquisition and functional use of voice output communication by persons with profound multiple disabilities. Behavior Modification 1996; 20: 451–468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepis MM, Reid DH. Effects of output communication aid on interactions between support personnel and an individual with multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1995; 28: 73–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevcik RA, Romski MA, Adamson LB. Research directions in augmentative and alternative communication for preschool children. Disability and Rehabilitation 2004; 26: 1323–1329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto G, Belfiore PJ, Acholosser RW, Haynes C. Teaching specific requests: A comparative analysis on skill acquisition and preference using two augmentative and alternative communication aids. Education and Training in Mental Retardation 1993; 28: 169–178
   Google Scholar
• Beck AA, Stoner JB, Bock SJ, Parton T. Comparison of PECS and the use of a VOCA: A replication. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities 2008; 43: 198–216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock SJ, Stoner JB, Beck AR, Hanley L, Prochnow J. Increasing functional communication in non-speaking preschool children: Comparison of PECS and VOCA. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities 2005; 40: 264–278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosbey JE, Johnston S. Using a single-switch voice output communication aid to increase social access for children with severe disabilities in inclusive classrooms. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 2006; 31: 144–156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicarlo CF, Banajee M. Using voice output devices to increase initiations of young children with disabilities. Journal of Early Intervention 2000; 23: 191–199
   Google Scholar
• Durand MV. Functional communication training using assistive devices: Effects on challenging behavior and affect. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1993; 9: 168–176
   Google Scholar
• Dyches TT. Effects of switch training on the communication of children with autism and severe disabilities. Focus on Autism and other Developmental Disorders 1998; 13: 151–162
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Sigafoos J, Oliva D, Severini L. Enabling two persons with multiple disabilities to access environmental stimuli and ask for social contact through microswitches and a VOCA. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2008; 29: 21–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Sigafoos J, Oliva D, Severini L. Three persons with multiple disabilities accessing environmental stimuli and asking for social contact through microswitch and VOCA technology. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2008; 52: 327–336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor G, Young J, Gerak J, Thomas B, Vogelsberg RT. Increasing functional use of an assistive communication device by a student with severe disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1992; 8: 243–250
   Google Scholar
• Northup J, Wacker DP, Berg WK, Kelly L, Sasso G, Deraad A. The treatment of severe behavior problems in school settings using a technical assistance model. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1994; 27: 33–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigafoos J, O’Reilly M, Ganz JB, Lancioni G, Schlosser RW. Supporting self-determination in AAC interventions by assessing preference for communication devices. Technology and Disability 2005; 17: 143–153
   Google Scholar
• Harding JW, Wacker, Wendy DP, et al. Analysis of multiple manding topographies during functional communication training. Educational and Treatment of Children 2009; 32: 21–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Keefe BM, Datttilo J. Teaching the response-recode form to adults with mental retardation using AAC systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1992; 8: 224–233
   Google Scholar
• Iacono TA, Duncum JE. Comparison of sign alone and in combination with an electronic communication device in early language intervention: Case study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1995; 11: 249–254
   Google Scholar
• Iacono T, Mirenda P, Beukelman D. Comparison of unimodal and multimodal ACC techniques for children with intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1993; 9: 83–94
   Google Scholar
• Myers C. ‘Please listen, it's my turn’: Instructional approaches, curricula and contexts for supporting communication and increasing access to inclusion. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 2007; 32: 263–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winborn-Kemmerer L, Ringdahl JE, Wacker DP, Kitsukawa K. A demonstration of individual preference for novel mands during functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2009; 42: 185–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathy-Laikko P, Iacono T, Ratcliff A, Villarruel F, Yoder D, Vanderheiden G. Teaching a child with multiple disabilities to use a tactile augmentative communication device. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1989; 5: 249–256
   Google Scholar
• Peck SM, Wacker DP, Berg WK, et al. Choice-making treatment of young children's severe behavior problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1996; 29: 263–290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steege MW, Wacker DP, Cigrand KC, et al. Use of negative reinforcement in the treatment of self-injurious behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1990; 23: 459–467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winborn L, Wacker DP, Richman JA, Geier D. Assesment of mand selection for functional communication training packages. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2002; 35: 295–298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck AR, Stoner JB, Dennis M. An investigation of aided language stimulation: Does it increase AAC use with adults with developmental disabilities and complex communication needs?. Augmentative & Alternative Communication 2009; 25: 42–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Sigafoos J, Oliva D, Baccani S. Teaching ‘Yes’ and ‘No’ responses to children with multiple disabilities through a program including microswitches linked to a vocal output device. Perceptual & Motor Skills 2006; 102: 51–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson RL, Boer-Ott SR, Griswold D, et al, Autism spectrum disorders: Interventions and treatments for children and youth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Bondy A, Frost L. The Picture Exchange Communication System. Focus on Autistic Behavior 1994; 9: 1–19
   Google Scholar
• Romski MA, Sevcik RA. Developing augmented language in children with severe mental retardation. Causes and effects in communication and language intervention, SF Warren, J Reichle. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore 1992; 113–130
   Google Scholar