References
- García-Alix A, Sáenz-de Pipaón M, Martínez M, Salas-Hernández S, Quero J. Ability of neonatal head circumference to predict long-term neurodevelopmental outcome. Revista de Neurologica 2004; 39: 548–554
- Pang T, Atefy R, Sheen V. Malformations of cortical development. Neurologist 2008; 14: 181–191
- Watemberg N, Silver S, Harel S, Lerman-Sagie T. Significance of microcephaly among children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Child Neurology 2002; 17: 117–122
- Heinonen K, Räikkönen K, Pesonen A-K, Kajantie E, Andersson S, Erikkson JG, Niemelä A, Vartia T, Peltola J, Lano A. Prenatal and postnatal growth and cognitive abilities at 56 months of age: A longitudinal study of infants born at term. Pediatrics 2008; 121: e1325–e1333
- Gale CR, O’Callaghan FJ, Bredow M, Martyn CN. Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children Study Team. The influence of head growth in fetal life, infancy, and childhood on intelligence at the ages of 4 and 8 years. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 1486–1492
- Kuklina EV, Ramakrishnan U, Stein AD, Barnhart HH, Martorell R. Early childhood growth and development in rural Guatemala. Early Human Development 2006; 82: 425–433
- Reolon RK, Rotta NT, Agranonik M, Moura da Silva AA, Goldani MZ. Influence of intrauterine and extrauterine growth on neurodevelopmental outcome of monozygotic twins. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 2008; 41: 694–699
- Bolduc FV, Shevell MI. Corrected head circumference centiles as a possible predictor of developmental performance in high-risk neonatal intensive care unit survivors. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 2005; 47: 766–770
- Hack M, Breslau N, Weissman B, Aram D, Klein N, Borawski E. Effect of very low birth weight and subnormal head size on cognitive abilities at school age. New England Journal of Medicine 1991; 325: 231–237
- Stathis SL, O’Callaghan M, Harvey J, Rogers Y. Head circumference in ELBW babies is associated with learning difficulties and cognition but not ADHD in the school-aged child. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1999; 41: 375–380
- Harris SR, Megens AM, Daniels LE, Harris Infant Neuromotor Test (HINT). Test User's Manual Version 1.0 Clinical Edition (2009). March 2010. IMPS, LLC. Available from http://thetimp.com/store/large/382h6/TIMP_Products/HINT_Test_Manual.html
- Bayley N. Bayley scales of infant development2nd. Psychological Corporation, New York 1993
- Harris SR, Daniels LE. Reliability and validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test. Journal of Pediatrics 2001; 139: 249–253
- Megens AM, Harris SR, Backman CL, Hayes VA. Known groups validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test. Physical Therapy 2007; 87: 164–169
- Tse L, Leo S, Fuchs T, Lee LLS, Harris SR, Hayes VE, Backman CL, Cameron D, Tardif M. Concurrent validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Journal of Pediatric Nursing 2008; 23: 28–36
- Ashwal S, Michelson D, Plawner L, Dobyns WB. Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Practice parameter: Evaluation of the child with microcephaly (an evidence-based review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology 2009; 73: 887–897
- Mehta NM, Thomas RM. Antenatal screening for rubella – infection or immunity?. British Medical Journal 2002; 325: 90–91
- Vargas JE, Allred EN, Leviton A, Holmes LB. Congenital microcephaly: Phenotypic features in a consecutive sample of newborn infants. Journal of Pediatrics 2001; 139: 210–214
- Blauw-Hospers CH, Hadders-Algra M. A systematic review of the effects of early intervention on motor development. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 2005; 47: 421–432