Automatic feedback to promote safe walking and speech loudness control in persons with multiple disabilities: Two single-case studies

References

• Lancioni G, O’Reilly M, Singh N, Oliva D. Enabling two women with blindness and additional disabilities to make phone calls independently via a computer-aided telephone system. Developmental Neurorehabilitation 2011; 14: 283–289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, La Martire ML, Oliva D, Groeneweg J. Technology-based programs to promote walking fluency or improve foot-ground contact during walking: Two case studies of adults with multiple disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2012; 33: 111–118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Oliva D, Smaldone A, La Martire ML, Alberti G, Scigliuzzo F. A verbal-instruction system to help persons with multiple disabilities perform complex food- and drink-preparation tasks independently. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2011; 32: 2739–2747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mechling LC, Gast DL, Seid NH. Evaluation of a personal digital assistant as a self-prompting device for increasing multi-step task completion by students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities 2010; 45: 422–439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mechling L, Seid NH. Use of a hand-held personal digital assistant (PDA) to self-prompt pedestrian travel by young adults with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities 2011; 46: 220–237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mifsud L, Mørch AI. Reconsidering off-task: A comparative study of PDA-mediated activities in four classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2010; 26: 190–201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramdoss S, Lang R, Fragale C, Britt C, O’Reilly M, Sigafoos J, Didden R, Palmen A, Lancioni GE. Use of computer-based interventions to promote daily living skills in individuals with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 2012; 24: 197–215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard L, Unsworth C. Developing skills in everyday activities and self-determination in adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education 2011; 32: 393–405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavender A, Vanam R, Barney DK, Ladner RE, Riskin EA. MobileASL: Intelligibility of sign language video over mobile phones. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2008; 3: 93–105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Green VA, Oliva D, Buonocunto F, Colonna F, Navarro J. Special text messaging communication systems for persons with multiple disabilities. Developmental Neurorehabilitation 2012; 15: 31–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown DJ, McHugh D, Standen P, Evett L, Shopland N, Battersby S. Designing location-based learning experiences for people with intellectual disabilities and additional sensory impairments. Computers and Education 2011; 56: 11–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Alberti G, Scigliuzzo F, Signorino M, Oliva D, Smaldone A, La Martire ML. Persons with multiple disabilities use orientation technology to find room entrances during indoor traveling. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2010; 31: 1577–1584
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hatakeyama T, Hagiwara F, Koike H, Ito K, Ohkubo H, Bond CW, Kasuga M. Remote infrared audible signage system. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 2004; 17: 61–70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trief E, De Lisi L, Cravello R, Yu Z. A profile of orientation and mobility instruction with a student with multiple disabilities. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 2007; 101: 620–625
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Marcus S, Behrendt M. A portable vibratory-feedback device for reducing excessive vocal loudness: A case study. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 1998; 26: 371–376
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Marcus S, Behrendt M. Vibratory versus auditory feedback for reducing excessive vocal loudness: A case study. Scandinavian Journal of Behaviour Therapy 1999; 28: 150–153
   Google Scholar
• Uslan M, Russell I, Weiner C. A ‘musical pathway’ for spatially disoriented blind residents of a skilled nursing facility. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 1988; 82: 21–24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Campodonico F, Oliva D. Self-management of orientation technology and auditory cues for indoor travel by two persons with multiple disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 2008; 20: 129–138
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Mantini M. A corrective feedback system for helping a person with multiple disabilities during indoor travel. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1999; 88: 1291–1295
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Sigafoos J, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN. Assistive technology: Interventions for individuals with severe/profound and multiple disabilities. Springer, New York 2012
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Marcus S. Reducing excessive vocal loudness in persons with mental retardation through portable feedback devices. Scandinavian Journal of Behaviour Therapy 1997; 26: 17–21
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Van Houten K, Ten Hopen G. Reducing excessive vocal loudness in persons with mental retardation through the use of a portable auditory-feedback device. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 1997; 28: 123–128
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sparrow SS, Balla DA, Cicchetti DV. Vineland adaptive behavior scales—Interview edition survey form. American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN 1984
   Google Scholar
• Mockel A, Perdomo Y, Stutzmann F, Letsch J, Marion V, Dollfus H. Retinal dystrophy in Bardet–Biedl syndrome and related syndromic ciliopathies. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 2011; 30: 258–274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow DH, Nock M, Hersen M. Single-case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change3rd. Allyn & Bacon, New York 2009
   Google Scholar
• Luiselli JK, Bass JD, Whitcomb SA. Teaching applied behavior analysis knowledge competencies to direct-care service providers: Outcome assessment and social validation of a training program. Behavior Modification 2010; 34: 403–414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson E, Hatton C. Socioeconomic disadvantage, social participation and networks and the self-rated health of English men and women with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities: Cross sectional survey. European Journal of Public Health 2008; 18: 31–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel RJ, Welsh RL, Lewis LJ. Improving the well-being of vision-impaired older adults through orientation and mobility training and rehabilitation: An evaluation. Re:view: Rehabilitation and Education for Blindness and Visual Impairment 2000; 32: 67–76
   Google Scholar
• Heyl V, Wahl HW. Psychosocial adaptation to age-related vision loss: A six-year perspective. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 2001; 95: 739–748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahoda A, Banks P, Dagnan D, Kemp J, Kerr W, Williams V. Starting a new job: The social and emotional experience of people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2009; 22: 421–425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell BA. Stress and the mobility training process: A literature review. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 1988; 82: 143–147
   Google Scholar
• Seybold D. Investigating stress associated with mobility training through consumer discussion groups. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 1993; 87: 111–112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris J. The use, role and application of advanced technology in the lives of disabled people in the UK. Disability and Society 2010; 25: 427–439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin JK, Martin LG, Stumbo NJ, Morrill JH. The impact of consumer involvement on satisfaction with and use of assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2011; 6: 225–242
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Percival J. Demonstrating daily living devices to older people with sight loss: A programme evaluation with implications for good practice and policy development. British Journal of Visual Impairment 2012; 30: 79–90
   Google Scholar
• Sauer AL, Parks A, Heyn PC. Assistive technology effects on the employment outcomes for people with cognitive disabilities: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2010; 5: 377–391
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Craddock G, Mackeogh T. The relationship of personal factors and subjective well-being to the use of assistive technology devices. Disability and Rehabilitation 2011; 33: 811–817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catania AC. Learning4th Interim. Sloan, New York 2007
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin AE. Behavior modification in applied settings6th. Wadsworth, New York 2001
   Google Scholar
• Grierson LEM, Zelek J, Lam I, Black SE, Carnahan H. Application of a tactile way-finding device to facilitate navigation in persons with dementia. Assistive Technology 2011; 23: 108–115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy C. Single case designs for educational research. Allyn & Bacon, New York 2005
   Google Scholar
• Levy-Tzedek S, Hanassy S, Abboud S, Maidenbaum S, Amedia A. Fast, accurate reaching movements with a visual-to-auditory sensory substitution device. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2012; 30: 313–323
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Money AG, Fernando S, Lines L, Elliman AD. Developing and evaluating web-based assistive technologies for older adults. Gerontechnology 2009; 8: 165–177
   Google Scholar
• Beach EF, Williams W, Gilliver M. The objective-subjective assessment of noise: Young adults can estimate loudness of events and lifestyle noise. International Journal of Audiology 2012; 51: 444–449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson JE, Lundh LG, Faghihi S, Roth-Andersson G. The enhancement of beneficial effects following audio feedback by cognitive preparation in the treatment of social anxiety: A single-session experiment. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 2011; 42: 497–503
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borg J, Larson S, Ostegren PO. The right to assistive technology: For whom, for what, and by whom?. Disability and Society 2011; 26: 151–167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Joode E, van Heughten C, Verhey F, van Boxtel M. Efficacy and usability of assistive technology for patients with cognitive deficits: A systematic review. Clinical Rehabilitation 2010; 24: 701–714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulzer-Azaroff B, Pollack MJ, Homad C, Howley T. Promoting widespread, durable service quality via interlocking contingencies. Research in Developmental Disabilities 1998; 19: 39–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan K, Henson R, Cowan AK. Social validation of evidence-based practices in autism by parents, teachers, and administrators. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2008; 38: 678–692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigam R. Sociocultural development and validation of lexicon for Asian-Indian individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2006; 1: 245–256
   PubMedGoogle Scholar