Microswitch-aided programs with contingent stimulation versus general stimulation programs for post-coma persons with multiple disabilities

References

• Bruno MA, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Thibaut A, Moonen G, Laureys S. From unresponsive wakefulness to minimally conscious PLUS and functional looked-in syndromes: Recent advances in our understanding of disorders of consciousness. Journal of Neurology 2011;258:1373–1384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman MR, Pickard JD. Detecting residual cognitive function in disorders of consciousness. Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery 2011;36:3–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giacino JT, Kalmar K. Diagnostic and prognostic guidelines for the vegetative and minimally conscious states. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2005;15:166–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosseries O, Bruno MA, Chatelle C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Schnakers C, Soddu A, Laureys S. Disorders of consciousness: What’s in a name? NeuroRehabilitation 2011;28:3–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim EJ, Park JM, Kim WH, Lee KL, Kim HN, Park JJ, Ahn KO. A learning set up for detecting minimally conscious state. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine 2012;36:428–431
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Bosco A, Olivetti Belardinelli M, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J. An overview of intervention options for promoting adaptive behavior of persons with acquired brain injury and minimally conscious state. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2010;31:1121–1134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Buonocunto F, Sacco V, Colonna F, Navarro J, Oliva D, Megna G, Bosco A. Technology-based intervention options for post-coma persons with minimally conscious state and pervasive motor disabilities. Developmental Neurorehabilitation 2009;12:24–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Amenduni MT, Navarro J, Buonocunto F, Scarabino T, Belardinelli MO. Microswitch technology and contingent stimulation to promote adaptive engagement in persons with minimally conscious state: A case evaluation. Cognitive Processing 2012;13:133–137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laureys S, Boly M. What is it like to be vegetative or minimally conscious? Current Opinion in Neurology 2007;20:609–613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pistoia F, Sacco S, Palmirotta R, Onorati P, Carolei A, Sarà M. Mismatch and neurophysiological findings in partial recovery of consciousness: A case report. Brain Injury 2008;22:633–637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Salvo S, Bramanti P, Marino S. Clinical differentiation and outcome evaluation in vegetative and minimally conscious state patients: The neurophysiological approach. Functional Neurology 2012;27:155–162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua KSG, Ng YS, Yap SGM, Bok CW. A brief review of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore 2007;36:31–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Stefano C, Cortesi A, Masotti S, Simoncini L, Piperno R. Increased behavioural responsiveness with complex stimulation in VS and MCS: Preliminary results. Brain Injury 2012;26:1250–1256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott L, Walker L. Rehabilitation interventions for vegetative and minimally conscious patients. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2005;15:480–493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiopoulos M, Katsakiori P, Kefalopoulou Z, Ellul J, Chroni E, Constantoyannis C. Vegetative state and minimally conscious state: A review of the therapeutic interventions. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 2010;88:199–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz DI, Polyak M, Coughlan D, Nichols M, Roche A. Natural history of recovery from brain injury after prolonged disorders of consciousness: Outcome of patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation with 1–4 year follow-up. Progress in Brain Research 2009;177:73–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong B. The vegetative and minimally conscious states in children: Spasticity, muscle contracture and issues of physiotherapy treatment. Brain Injury 2002;16:217–230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukowicz M, Matuszak K, Talar A. A misdiagnosed patient: 16 years of locked-in syndrome, the influence of rehabilitation. Medical Science Monitor 2010;16:CS18–CS23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Magee WL. Music therapy with patients in low awareness states: Approaches to assessment and treatment in multidisciplinary care. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2005;15:552–536
   Google Scholar
• Magee WL. Music as a diagnostic tool in low awareness states: Considering limbic responses. Brain Injury 2007;21:593–599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolle P, Reimer M. Do we need stimulation programs as part of nursing care for patients in “persistent vegetative state”? A conceptual analysis. Axone 2003;25:20–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whyte J. Treatments to enhance recovery from the vegetative and minimally conscious states. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2007;86:86–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis AE, Gimenez A. Cognitive-behavioral recovery in comatose patients following auditory sensory stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing 2003;35:202–214
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lombardi F, Taricco M, De Tanti A, Telaro E, Liberati A. Sensory stimulation of brain-injured individuals in coma or vegetative state: Results od a Cochrane systematic review. Clinical Rehabilitation 2002;16:464–472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotze M, Schertel K, Birbaumer N, Kotchoubey B. A long-term intensive behavioural treatment study in patients with persistent vegetative state or minimally conscious state. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2011;43:230–236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wales L, Waite C. Children in vegetative state and minimally conscious state: A survey of sensory and cognitive intervention. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 2005;68:486–494
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Alberti G, Oliva D, Megna G, Iliceto C, Damiani S, Ricci I, Spica A. Post-coma persons with extensive motor disabilities use microswitch technology to access selected stimulation events or operate a radio device. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2011;32:1638–1645
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Olivetti Belardinelli M, Buonocunto F, Sacco V, Navarro J, Lanzilotti C, De Tommaso M, et al. Promoting adaptive behavior in persons with acquired brain injury, extensive motor and communication disabilities, and consciousness disorders. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2012;33:1964–1974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Ricci I, Buonocunto F, Sacco V. Access to environmental stimulation via eyelid responses for persons with acquired brain injury and multiple disabilities: A new microswitch arrangement. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2012;114:353–362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow DH, Nock M, Hersen, M. Single-case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. 3rd ed. New York: Allyn & Bacon; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin AE. Behavior modification in applied settings. 6th ed. New York: Wadsworth; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy C. Single case designs for educational research. New York: Allyn & Bacon; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Kalmar K, Giacino JT. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2005;15:454–460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi F, Gatta G, Sacco S, Muratori A, Carolei A. The Italian version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Functional Neurology 2007;22:47–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel S, Castellan NJ. Nonparametric statistics. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1988
   Google Scholar
• Bosco A, Lancioni GE, Olivetti Belardinelli M, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J. Learning as a possible sign of non-reflective consciousness in persons with a diagnosis of vegetative state and pervasive motor disabilities. Cognitive Processing 2009;10:355–359
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Abels J, Wilms EH, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Groeneweg J. Microswitch responding and awareness of contingency in persons with profound multiple disabilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2003;96:835–838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders RR, Saunders MD, Struve B, Munce AL, Olswang LB, Dowden PA, Klasner ER. Discovering indices of contingency awareness in adults with multiple profound disabilities. American Journal on Mental retardation 2007;112:246–260
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tota A, Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Oliva D. Evaluating the applicability of optic microswitches for eyelid responses in students with profound multiple disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2006;1:217–223
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Catania AC. Learning. 4th Interim ed. New York: Sloan; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Spivey M. The continuity of mind. London: Oxford University Press; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Foreman P, Arthur-Kelly M, Pascoe S, King BS. Evaluating the educational experiences of students with profound and multiple disabilities in inclusive and segregated classroom settings: An Australian perspective. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 2004;29:183–193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovannetti AM, Leonardi M, Pagani M, Sattin D, Raggi A. Burden of caregivers of patients in vegetative state and minimally conscious state. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 2013;127:10–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschberg R, Giacino JT. The vegetative and minimally conscious state: Diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Neurologic Clinics 2011;29:773–786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi M, Giovannetti AM, Pagani M, Raggi A, Sattin D. Burden and needs of 487 caregivers of patients in vegetative state and in minimally conscious state: Results from a national study. Brain Injury 2012;26:1201–1210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munde VS, Vlaskamp C, Ruijssenaars AJJM, Nakken H. Alertness in individuals with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: A literature review. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2009;30:462–480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munde VS, Vlaskamp C, Ruijssenaars AJJM, Nakken H. Experts discussing “alertness in individuals with PIMD”: A concept mapping procedure. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 2009;21:263–277
   Google Scholar
• Bauer S, Elsaesser L-J. Integrating medical, assistive, and universally designed products and technologies: Assistive technology device classification (ATDC). Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2012;7:350–355
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borg J, Larson S, Östegren PO. The right to assistive technology: For whom, for what, and by whom? Disability and Society 2011;26:151–167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holburn S, Nguyen D, Vietze PM. Computer-assisted learning for adults with profound multiple disabilities. Behavioral Interventions 2004;19:25–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. Assistive technologies and other supports for people with brain impairments. New York: Springer; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Sigafoos J, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN. Assistive technology interventions for individuals with severe/profound and multiple disabilities. New York: Springer; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Arthur M. Patterns amongst behavior states, sociocommunicative, and activity variables in educational programs for students with profound and multiple disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 2004;16:125–149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones MC, Walley RM, Leech A, Paterson M, Common S, Metcalf C. Behavioral and psychosocial outcomes of a 16-week rebound therapy-based exercise program for people with profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 2007;4:111–119
   Google Scholar
• Mellstrom BP, Saunders MD, Saunders RR, Olswang LB. Interaction of behavioral state and microswitch use in individuals with profound multiple disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 2005;17:35–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy KM, Saunders MD, Saunders RR, Olswang LB. Effects of ambient stimuli on measures of behavioral state and microswitch use in adults with profound multiple impairments. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2004;25:355–370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer T, Langner R, Birbaumer N, Brocke B. Arousal and attention: Self-chosen stimulation optimizes cortical excitability and minimizes compensatory effort. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008;20:1443–1453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munde VS, Vlaskamp C, Ruijssenaars AJJM, Maes B, Nakken H. Observing and influencing alertness in individuals with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in multisensory environments. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology 2012;11:5–19
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill B. Review of assistive technologies and other supports for people with brain impairment. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2012;22:948–950
   Google Scholar
• Wallace T, Bradshaw A. Technologies and strategies for people with communication problems following brain injury or stroke. NeuroRehabilitation 2011;28:199–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan K, Henson R, Cowan AK. Social validation of evidence-based practices in autism by parents, teachers, and administrators. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2008;38:678–692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Oliva D, Gatti M, Manfredi F, Megna G, La Martire ML, Tota A, et al. A microswitch-cluster program to foster adaptive responses and head control in students with multiple disabilities: Replication and validation assessment. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2008;29:373–384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar