Impact of PECS tablet computer app on receptive identification of pictures given a verbal stimulus

References

• American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of autism in children. 2012. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6103a1.htm?s_cid=ss6103a1_w [last accessed 19 June 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Light J, McNaughton D. Supporting the communication, language, and literacy development of children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research priorities. Assistive Technology 2012;24:34–44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbaro J, Dissanayake C. Developmental profiles of infants and toddlers with autism spectrum disorders identified prospectively in a community-based setting. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2012;42:1939–1948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudry K, Leadbitter K, Temple K, Slonims V, McConachie H, Aldred C, Howlin P, Charman T, PACT Consortium. Preschoolers with autism show greater impairment in receptive compared with expressive language abilities. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2010;45:681–690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz A, Quach W, Lund SK, McKelvey M. AAC assessment and clinical-decision making: The impact of experience. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2012;28:148–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganz JB, Earles-Vollrath TL, Heath AK, Parker RI, Rispoli MJ, Duran JB. A meta-analysis of single case research studies on aided augmentative and alternative communication systems with individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2012;42:60–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost L, Bondy A. PECS: The picture exchange communication system training manual, 2nd ed. Cherry Hill, NJ: Pyramid Educational Consultants; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Flores M, Musgrove K, Renner S, Hinton V, Strozier S, Franklin S, Hil D. A comparison of communication using the Apple iPad a picture-based system. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2012;28:74–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boesch MC, Wendt O, Subramanian A, Hsu N. Comparative efficacy of the picture exchange communication system (PECS) versus a speech-generating device: Effects on requesting skills. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 2013;7:480–493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd LL, Fuller DR, Arvidson HH. Augmentative and alternative communication: A handbook of principles and practices. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 1997
   Google Scholar
• Bondy A, Frost L. The picture exchange communication system. Focus on Autistic Behavior 1994;9:1–19
   Google Scholar
• Ganz JB, Davis JL, Lund EM, Goodwyn FD, Simpson RL. Meta-analysis of PECS with individuals with ASD: Investigation of targeted versus non-targeted outcomes, participant characteristics, and implementation phase. Research in Developmental Disorders 2012;33:406–418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganz JB, Simpson RL. Effects on communicative requesting and speech development of the picture exchange communication system in children with characteristics of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2004;34:395–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski MA, Sevcik RA, Adamson LB, Cheslock M, Smith A, Barker RM, Bakeman R. Randomized comparison of augmented and nonaugmented language interventions for toddlers with developmental delays and their parents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2010;53:350–364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell ME, Brady N, McLean L, Ogletree BT, Siegel E, Sylvester L, Sevcik R. Twenty years of communication intervention research with individuals who have severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 2010;115:364–380
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romski MA, Sevcik RA. Augmentative communication and early intervention: Myths and realities. Infants & Young Children 2005;18:174–185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganz JB, Rispoli MJ, Mason RA, Hong ER. Moderation of effects of AAC based on setting and types of aided AAC on outcome variables: An aggregate study of single-case research with individuals with ASD. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, in press
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser RW, Wendt O. Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2008;17:212–230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood LA, Lasker J, Siegel-Causey E, Beukelman DR, Ball L. Input framework for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1998;14:261–267
   Google Scholar
• Sevcik RA. Comprehension: An overlooked component in augmented language development. Disability and Rehabilitation 2006;28:159–167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luyster R, Kadlec MB, Carter A, Tager-Flusberg H. Language assessment and development in toddlers with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2008;38:1426–1438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjelgaard M, Tager-Flusberg H. An investigation of language impairment in autism: Implications for genetic subgroups. Language and Cognitive Processes 2001;16:287–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canella-Malone H, DeBar RM, Sigafoos J. An examination of preference for augmentative and alternative communication devices with two boys with significant intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2009;25:262–273
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Son S, Sigafoos J, O’Reilly M, Lancioni GE. Comparing two types of augmentative and alternative communication systems for children with autism. Pediatric Rehabilitation 2006;9:389–395
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Light JC, Roberts B, DiMarco R, Greiner N. Augmentative and alternative communication to support receptive and expressive communication for people with autism. Journal of Communication Disorders 1998;31:153–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce SM, Trief E, Cascella PW. Teachers’ and speech-language pathologists’ perceptions about a tangible symbols intervention: Efficacy, generalization, and recommendations. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2011;27:172–182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tager-Flusberg H, Rogers S, Cooper J, Landa R, Lord C, Paul R, Rice M, Stoel-Gammon C, Wetherby A, Yoder P. Defining spoken language benchmarks and selecting measures of expressive language development for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2009;52:643–652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher W, Piazza CC, Bowman LG, Hagopian LP, Owens JC, Slevin I. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1992;25:491–498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill TR, Levin JR. Enhancing the scientific credibility of single-case intervention research: Randomization to the rescue. Psychological Methods 2010;15:122–144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner RH, Carr EG, Halle J, McGee G, Odom S, Wolery M. The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children 2005;71:165–179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder PJ, Symons FJ. Observational measurement of behavior. New York, NY: Springer; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein S, Naglieri JA. Autism spectrum rating scales. Toronto, Canada: Multi Health Systems; 2009
   Google Scholar