Australian parents’ experiences of speech generating device (SGD) service delivery

References

• Angelo DH. Impact of augmentative and alternative communication devices on families. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2000;16:37–47
   Google Scholar
• Bailey RL, Parette HP, Stoner JB, Angell ME, Carroll K. Family members’ perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication device use. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 2006;37:50–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson S, Skelton H, Rosenbaum P. Assistive devices for children with functional impairments: Impact on child and caregiver function. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 2008;50:89–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall F, Marková I, Murphy J, Moodie E, Collins S. Perspectives on AAC systems by the users and by their communication partners. European Journal of Disorders of Communication 1997;32:235–256
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baxter S, Enderby P, Evans P, Judge S. Barriers and facilitators to the use of high-technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2012;47:115–129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall J, Goldbart J. “Communication is everything I think.” Parenting a child who needs augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2008;43:77–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton D, Rackensperger T, Benedek-Wood E, Krezman C, Williams MB, Light J. “A child needs to be given a chance to succeed”: Parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2008;24:43–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson KM, Hennig S. The state of research and practice in augmentative and alternative communication for children with developmental/intellectual disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews 2007;13:58–69
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson JM, Inglebret E, Jones C, Ray J. Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2006;22:85–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldbart J, Marshall J. “Pushes and pulls” on the parents of children who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2004;20:194–208
   Google Scholar
• Angelo DH, Jones SD, Kokoska SM. Family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of young children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1995;11:193–202
   Google Scholar
• Pickl G. Communication intervention in children with severe disabilities and multilingual backgrounds: Perceptions of pedagogues and parents. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2011;27:229–244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens CS. Disability, caregiving and interpellation: Migrant and non-migrant families of children with disabilities in urban Australia. Disability and Society 2010;25:783–796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cress CJ. Augmentative and alternative communication and language: Understanding and resposnding to parents’ perspectives. Topics in Language Disorders 2004;24:51–61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case S. Refocusing on the parent: What are the social issues of concern for parents of disabled children? Disability and Society 2000;15:271–292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granlund M, Björck-Åkesson E, Wilder J, Ylvén R. AAC interventions for children in a family environment: Implementing evidence in practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2008;24:207–219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferm U, Andersson M, Broberg M, Liljegren T, Thunberg G. Parents and course leaders’ experiences of the ComAlong augmentative and alternative communication early intervention course. Disability Studies Quarterly 2011;31(4). http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/1718/1768. Accessed 2013 Aug 15
   Google Scholar
• Raghavendra P, Murchland S, Bentley M, Wake-Dyster W, Lyons T. Parents’ and service providers’ perceptions of family-centred practice in a community-based, paediatric disability service in Australia. Child: Care, Health and Development 2007;33:586–592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell ME, Chen L, Hoover K. Teaching augmentative and alternative communication to students with severe disabilities: A review of intervention research 1997–2003. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 2006;31:203–214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes DRP. AAC interventions for autism: A research perspective. International Journal of Special Education 2008;23:17–23. http://www.internationaljournalofspecialeducation.com/issues.cfm. Accessed 2013 Aug 15
   Google Scholar
• Bundy A, Hemsley B, Brentnall J, Marshall E. Therapy services in the disability sector: Literature review. Sydney: NSW Department of Ageing, Disability and Home Care; 2008. http://www.adhc.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/file/0007/228139/10_Therapy_Services_Disability_Sector.pdf. Accessed 2013 Jan 20
   Google Scholar
• Iacono T, Cameron M. Australian speech-language pathologists’ perceptions and experiences of augmentative and alternative communication in early childhood intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2009;25:236–249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bercow J. The Bercow report: A review of services for children and young people (0–19) with speech, language and communication needs. Nottingham; 2008. http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/bercowreview. Accessed 2013 Aug 10
   Google Scholar
• Edgar DL, Rosa-Lugo LI. The critical shortage of speech-language pathologists in the public school setting: Features of the work environment that affect recruitment and retention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 2007;38:31–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggero L, McCabe P, Ballard KJ, Munro N. Paediatric speech-language pathology service delivery: An exploratory survey of Australian parents. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2012;14:338–350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdon S, Wilson L, Smith-Tamaray M, McAllister L. An investigation of equity of rural speech-language pathology services for children: A geographic perspective. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2011;13:239–250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson L, Lincoln M, Onslow M. Availability, access, and quality of care: Inequities in rural speech pathology services for children and a model for redress. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2002;4:9–22
   Google Scholar
• Balandin S, Iacono T. AAC and Australian speech pathologists: Report on a national survey. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1998;14:239–249
   Google Scholar
• Dew A, Veitch C, Lincoln M, Brentnall J, Bulkeley K, Gallego G, Bundy A, Griffiths S. The need for new models for delivery of therapy intervention to people with a disability in rural and remote areas of Australia. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 2012;37:50–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padgett DK. Qualitative and mixed methods in public health. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Riessman CK. Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Anderson K, Balandin S, Stancliffe RJ. Parents’ views on alternative and supplementary service delivery models for families with a new speech generating device. 2013. [in preparation]
   Google Scholar
• Anderson K, Boisvert MK, Doneski-Nicol J, Gutmann ML, Hall NC, Morelock C, Steele R, Cohn ER. Tele-AAC resolution. International Journal of Telerehabilitation 2012;4:79–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bush M, Scott R. No voice, no choice: A sustainable future for alternative and augmentative communication (AAC). Full Report. London; 2009. http://www.scope.org.uk/help-and-information/publications/no-voice-no-choice-final-report. Accessed 2013 Aug 02
   Google Scholar
• Carter B, Cummings J, Cooper L. An exploration of best practice in multi-agency working and the experiences of families of children with complex health needs. What works well and what needs to be done to improve practice for the future? Journal of Clinical Nursing 2007;16:527–539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman DR, Mirenda P. Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Limbrick P. The Team Around The Child: Multiagency service co-ordination for children with complex needs and their families. Worcester: Interconnections; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Delarosa E, Horner S, Eisenberg C, Ball L, Renzoni AM, Ryan SE. Family impact of assistive technology scale: Development of a measurement scale for parents of children with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2012;28:171–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson K, Balandin S, Stancliffe RJ. Training for families with a new speech generating device: Insights and ideas from parents and therapists. 2013. [in preparation]
   Google Scholar
• Campbell PH, Sawyer LB. Supporting learning opportunities in natural settings through participation-based services. Journal of Early Intervention 2007;29:287–305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetzroni O. Augmentative and alternative communication in Israel: Results from a family survey. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2002;18:255–266
   Google Scholar
• Case S. Learning to partner, disabling conflict: Early indications of an improving relationship between parents and professionals with regard to service provision for children with learning disabilities. Disability and Society 2001;16:837–854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar