Comparing acquisition of and preference for manual signs, picture exchange, and speech-generating devices in nine children with autism spectrum disorder

References

• Beukelman D, Mirenda P. Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs, 4th ed. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing; 2013
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda P. Toward functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism: Manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Language, Speech, & Hearing Services in Schools 2003;34:203–216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flippin M, Reszka S, Watson L. Effectiveness of the picture exchange communication system (PECS) on communication and speech for children with autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2010;19:178–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meer L, Rispoli M. Communication interventions involving speech-generating devices for children with autism: A review of the literature. Developmental Neurorehabilitation 2010;13:294–306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondy A, Frost L. The picture exchange communication system: Clinical and research applications. In: Mirenda P, Iacono T, editors. Autism spectrum disorders and AAC. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.; 2009. pp 279–302
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni G, O'Reilly M, Cuvo A, Singh N, Sigafoos J, Didden R. PECS and VOCAs to enable students with developmental disabilities to make requests: An overview of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2007;28:468–488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meer L, Didden R, Sutherland D, O'Reilly M, Lancioni G, Sigafoos J. Comparing three augmentative and alternative communication modes for children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 2012;24:451–468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meer L, Kagohara D, Achmadi D, O'Reilly M, Lancioni G, Sutherland D, Sigafoos J. Speech-generating devices versus manual signing for children with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2012;33:1658–1669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meer L, Sutherland D, O'Reilly M, Lancioni G, Sigafoos J. A further comparison of manual signing, picture exchange, and speech-generating devices as communication modes for children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 2012;6:1247–1257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boesch M, Wendt O, Subramanian A, Hsu N. Comparative efficacy of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) versus a speech-generating device: Effects on requesting skills. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 2013;7:480–493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boesch M, Wendt O, Subramanian A, Hsu N. Comparative efficacy of the picture exchange communication system (PECS) versus a speech-generating device: Effects on social-communicative skills and speech development. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2013;29:197–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores M, Musgrove K, Renner S, Hinton V, Stroizer S, Franklin S, Hil D. A comparison of communication using the Apple iPad and a picture-based system. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2012;28:1–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorah E, Tincani M, Dodge J, Gilroy S, Hickey D, Hantula D. Evaluating picture exchange and the iPad™ as a speech generating device to teach communication to young children with autism. Journal of Developmental Physical Disabilities [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2013 October 12]. Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10882-013-9337-1
   Google Scholar
• Son S, Sigafoos J, O’Reilly M, Lancioni G. Comparing two types of augmentative and alternative communication systems for children with autism. Pediatric Rehabilitation 2006;9:389–395
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Light J, McNaughton D. The iPad and mobile technology revolution: Benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2013;29:107–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrow S, Cicchetti D, Balla D. Vineland-II Adaptive Behavior Scales. 2nd ed. Minneapolis: Pearson; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Sennott S, Bowker A. Autism, AAC, and Proloquo2Go. Perspectives on augmentative and alternative communication 2009;18:137–145
   Google Scholar
• NZSL Online [Internet]. Wellington, NZ: Victoria University [cited 2013 October 13]. Available from: http://nzsl.vuw.ac.nz/signs/1897
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy C. Single-case designs for educational research. Boston: Pearson; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Light J, Drager K, Nemser J. Enhancing the appeal of AAC technologies for young children: Lessons from the toy manufacturers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2004;20:137–149
   Google Scholar
• Drager K, Light J, McNaughton D. Effects of AAC interventions on communication and language for young children with complex communication needs. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine: An Interdisciplinary Approach 2010;3:303–331
   PubMedGoogle Scholar