Accuracy of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) to detect developmental delay of gross motor skills in preterm infants: A systematic review

References

• Wang T-N, Howe T-H, Hinojosa J, Hsu Y-W. Postural control of pre-term infants at 6 and 12 months corrected age. Early Human Development 2010;86(7):433–437
   Google Scholar
• Stoelhorst GMSJ, Rijken M, Martens SE, van Zwieten PHT, Feenstra J, Zwinderman AH, Wit JM, Veen S. Developmental outcome at 18 and 24 months of age in very preterm children: A cohort study from 1996 to 1997. Early Human Development 2003;72(2):83–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGowan JE, Alderdice FA, Holmes VA, Johnston L. Early childhood development of late-preterm infants: A systematic review. Pediatrics 2011;127(6):1111–1124
   Google Scholar
• Spittle AJ, Doyle LW, Boyd RN. A systematic review of the clinimetric properties of neuromotor assessments for preterm infants during the first year of life. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 2008;50(4):254–266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhutta AT, Anand KJS. Vulnerability of the developing brain. Neuronal mechanisms. Clinics in Perinatology 2002;29(3):357–372
   Google Scholar
• Walker SM, Franck LS, Fitzgerald M, Myles J, Stocks J, Marlow N. Long-term impact of neonatal intensive care and surgery on somatosensory perception in children born extremely preterm. Pain 2009;141(1–2):79–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza E, Magalhães L. Motor and functional development in infants born preterm and full term: Influence of biological and environmental risk factors. Jornal de Pediatria 2012;30(4):462–470
   Google Scholar
• Aly Z, Taj F, Ibrahim S. Missed opportunities in surveillance and screening systems to detect developmental delay: A developing country perspective. Brain and Development 2010;32(2):90–98
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Pediatrics. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: An algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics 2006;118(1):405–420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darrah J, Senthilselvan A, Magill-Evans J. Trajectories of serial motor scores of typically developing children: Implications for clinical decision making. Infant Behavior and Development 2009;32(1):72–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayley N. Bayley scale of infant and toddler development. 3rd ed. San Antonio: The Psychological Corp; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Folio MR, Fewel RR. Peabody developmental motor scales: Examinerś manual. 2nd ed. Austin: Pro-Ed; 2000
   Google Scholar
• Griffths R. The abilities of babies. London: Universty of London Press; 1986
   Google Scholar
• Provost B, Heimerl S, McClain C, Kim N-H, Lopez BR, Kodituwakku P. Concurrent validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II Motor Scale and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 in children with developmental delays. Pediatric Physical Therapy 2004;16(3):149–156
   Google Scholar
• Piper MC, Darrah J. Motor assessment of the developing infant. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1994
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard Y, Neilan E, Busanich J, Garavuso L, Klimas D. Interrater reliability of early intervention providers scoring the Alberta infant motor scale. Pediatric Physical Therapy 2004;16(1):13–18
   Google Scholar
• Almeida KM, Dutra MVP, Mello RR, De Reis ABR, Martins PS. Concurrent validity and reliability of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in premature infants. Jornal de Pediatria 2008;84(5):442–448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt RL, Factor RE. Understanding sources of bias in diagnostic accuracy studies. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine 2013;137(4):558–565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijmer JG, Bossuyt PMM, Heisterkamp SH. Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests. Statistics in Medicine. 2002;21(11):1525–1537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting P, Rutjes A, Dinnes J, Reitsma J, Bossuyt P, Kleijnen J. Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies. Health Technology Assessment 2004;8(25):228–234
   Google Scholar
• Bayley N. Bayley scale of infant development. 2nd ed. San Antonio: The Psychological Corp; 1993
   Google Scholar
• Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks J, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MMG, Sterne JAC, Bossuyt PMM. Quadas-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Annals of Internal Medicine 2011;155(8):529–536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim ZH, Aydinli N, Ekici B, Tatli B, Caliskan M. Can Alberta infant motor Scale and Milani comparetti motor development screening test be rapid alternatives to bayley scale of infant development-II at high-risk infants. Annals of Indian Academy Neurology 2012;15(3):196–199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris SR, Backman CL, Mayson TA. Comparative predictive validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 2010;52(5):462–467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder P, Eason JM, Philibert D, Ridgway A, McCaughey T. Concurrent validity and reliability of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in infants at dual risk for motor delays. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 2008;28(3):267–282
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jeng S-F, Yau K-IT, Chen L-C, Hsiao S-F. Research report Alberta Infant Motor Scale: Reliability and validity when used on preterm infants in Taiwan. Physical Therapy 2000;80(2):168–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeflang MMG, Deeks JJ, Takwoingi Y, Macaskill P. Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews. Systematic Reviews 2013;2(1):82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fritz JM, Wainner RS. Examining diagnostic tests: An evidence-based perspective. Physical Therapy 2001;81(9):1546–1564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, Di Nisio M, Smidt N, van Rijn JC, Bossuyt PMM. Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2006;174(4):469–476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Eng J. Sample size estimation: How many individuals should be studied? Radiology 2003;227(2):309–313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flahault A, Cadilhac M, Thomas G. Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2005;58:859–862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: CRD, University of York; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2010;47(8):931–936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady DG, Newman TB. Designing clinical research. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: Analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003;22(1):85–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar