644
Views
58
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Perinatal health monitoring in Europe: results from the EURO-PERISTAT project

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 64-79 | Published online: 20 Aug 2010

References

  • World Health Organization. Copenhagen (Denmark): WHO Regional Office for Europe [cited 2010 March 25]. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/hfadb
  • Kilpeläinen K, Aromaa A, the ECHIM Core Group, editors. European health indicators: development and initial implementation. Final report of the ECHIM project. Publications B31. Helsinki: National Public Health Institute; 2008.
  • Zeitlin J, Wildman K, Bréart G, Alexander S, Barros H, Blondel B, Buitendijk S, Macfarlane A. Selecting an indicator set for monitoring and evaluating perinatal health in Europe: criteria, methods and results from the PERISTAT project. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2003;111(Suppl 1):S5–S14.
  • Zeitlin J, Wildman K, Breart G, Alexander S, Barros H, Blondel B, Buitendijk S, Macfarlane A, PERISTAT Scientific Advisory Committee. PERISTAT: indicators for monitoring and evaluating perinatal health in Europe. European Journal of Public Health 2003;13(Suppl 3):29–37.
  • EURO-PERISTAT. – Better statistics for better health for pregnant women and their babies [Internet]. European perinatal health report. Available from: http://www.europeristat.com (accessed 25 March 2010).
  • Cuttini M, Marini C, Bruzzone S, Prati S, Saracci R. Protection of health information in Italy: a step too far? International Journal of Epidemiology 2008; International Journal of Epidemiology 2009;38(6):1739–1740.
  • Anthony S, van der Pal-de Bruin KM, Graafmans WC, Dorrepaal CA, Borkent-Polet M, van Hemel OJ, Jansen FH, den Ouden AL. The reliability of perinatal and neonatal mortality rates: differential under-reporting in linked professional registers vs. Dutch civil registers. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 2001;15(3):306–314.
  • Lack N, Schneider KTM. Qualitätsmessung zwischen Illusion und Realität - Ist Qualität in der Medizin messbar? (Measurement of quality between illusion and reality – can quality be measured in Medicine? Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie (In German) 2005;209:1–7.
  • EUROCAT. European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies [Internet]. Available from: http://www.eurocat.ulster.ac.uk/surveillance/ (accessed 25 March 2010).
  • Bonet M, Kaminski M, Blondel B. Differential trends in breastfeeding according to maternal and hospital characteristics: results from the French National Perinatal Surveys. Acta Paediatrica 2007;96(9):1290–1295.
  • WHO. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. Tenth revision. Vol. 1. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992.
  • Wilkinson J, Berghmans L, Imbert F, Ledésert B, Ochoa A, ISARE II project team. Health indicators in the European regions – ISARE II. European Journal of Public Health 2008;18(2):178–183.
  • Temmerman M, Foster BL, Hannaford P, Cattaneo A, Olsen J, Bloemenkamp K, Jahn A, da Silva MO, Reproductive health indicators in the European Union: the REPROSTAT project. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2006;126:3–10.
  • Gissler M, Hannikainen-Ingman K, Donati S, Jahn A, Oliveira da Silva M, Hemminki E, REPROSTAT group. The feasibility of European reproductive health indicators. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care 2008;13(4):376–386.
  • Gourbin G, Masuy-Stroobant G. Registration of vital data: are live births and stillbirths comparable all over Europe? Bulletin of World Health Organization 1995;73:449–460.
  • Graafmans W, Richardus JH, Macfarlane A, Rebagliato M, Blondel B, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Mackenbach J, EuroNatal Working Group. Comparability of published perinatal mortality rates in Western Europe: the quantitative impact of differences in gestational age and birth weight criteria. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2001;108:1237–1245.
  • Lack N, Zeitlin J, Krebs L, Künzel W, Alexander S. Methodological difficulties in the comparison of indicators of perinatal health across Europe. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2003;28:111 (Suppl 1):S33–S44.
  • Deneux-Tharaux C, Berg C, Bouvier-Colle M-H, Gissler M, Harper M, Nannini A, Bréart G, Buekens P, Underreporting of pregnancy-related mortality in the United States and Europe. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005;106:684–692.
  • Blondel B, Zeitlin J: Perinatal health: situation in France and in the other member states of the European Union. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2009;38:103–105.
  • Verschuuren M, Badeyan G, Carnicero J, Gissler M, Pace Asciak R, Sakkeus L, Stenbeck M, Devillé W, The European data protection legislation does not provide a clear and harmonized framework for public health monitoring: a plea for action. European Journal of Public Health 2008;18:550–551.
  • Langley JD, Botha JL. Use of record linkage techniques to maintain the Leicestershire diabetes register. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 1994;41:287–295.
  • Tzoumaka-Bakoula C. The Greek national perinatal survey: I: design, methodology, case ascertainment. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 1987;1:43–55.
  • Macfarlane A, Gissler M, Bolumar F, Rasmussen S. The availability of perinatal health indicators in Europe. Indicators to monitor and evaluate perinatal health in Europe. Results from the PERISTAT project. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2003;111(Suppl 1):S15–S32.
  • Cans C. Surveillance of cerebral palsy in Europe: a collaboration of cerebral palsy surveys and registers. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 2000;42:816–824.
  • Blondel B, Macfarlane A, Gissler M, Bréart G, the PERISTAT study group. Preterm birth and multiple pregnancy in European countries participating in PERISTAT project. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2006;113(5):528–535.
  • Zeitlin J, Blondel B, Alexander S, Bréart G, the PERISTAT group. Variation in the rates of postterm birth in Europe: reality or artefact. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007;114(9):1097–1103.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.