A model based on multi-features to enhance healthcare and medical document retrieval

References

• Betin Can A, Baykal N. MedicoPort: a medical search engine for all. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2007;86:73–86.
   Google Scholar
• Yildiz M, Pratt W. The effect of feature representation on MEDLINE Document Classification. In: Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Fall Symposium, Washington, D.C.; 2005, pp. 849–853.
   Google Scholar
• Newton I. Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. 3rd ed, London, England: Henry Pemberton; 1726.
   Google Scholar
• Hersh W, Buckley C, Leone T, Hickman D. OHSUMED: an interactive retrieval evaluation and new large text collection for research. In: Croft WB, van Rijsbergen CJ, editors.Proceedings of the 17th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR ′94), Dublin, Ireland; 1994, pp. 192–201.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson S, Hull DA. The TREC-9 filtering track final report. In: Voorhees EM, Harman DK, Editors.Proceedings of the Ninth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-9), Gaithersburg, Maryland: Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2000, pp. 25–40.
   Google Scholar
• Geng X, Liu T, Qin T, Li H. Feature selection for ranking. In: Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, Amsterdam, Netherlands; 2007, pp. 407–441.
   Google Scholar
• Chagoyen M, Carmona-Saez P, Shatkay H, Caraz M, Pascual-Montano A. Discovering semantic features in the literature: a foundation for building functional associations. BMC Bioinformatics 2006;7:41. DOI:10.1186/1471-2105-7-41.
   Google Scholar
• Dumais T, Platt J, Heckerman D, Sahami M. Inductive learning algorithms for text categorization. In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Bethesda, Maryland; 1998, pp. 148–155.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis D. An evaluation of phrasal and clustered representations on a text categorization task. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Copenhagen, Denmark; 1992, pp. 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Charniak E. Statistical language learning. CambridgeMIT Press1993.
   Google Scholar
• Jelinek F. Statistical methods for speech recognition. CambridgeMIT Press1997.
   Google Scholar
• Mao W, Chu W. Free-text medical document retrieval via phrase-based vector space model. In: Proceedings of the Annual AMIA SymposiumSan Antonio, TX2002pp. 489–493.
   Google Scholar
• Boyack K, Mane K, Börner K. Mapping medline papers, genes, and proteins related to melanoma research. IV2004 Conference. London, UK; 2004, pp. 965–971.
   Google Scholar
• Lin J. PageRank without hyperlinks: Reranking with PubMed related article networks for biomedical text retrieval. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:270. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-270.
   Google Scholar
• Lin J, DiCuccio M, Grigoryan V, Wilbur W. Exploring the effectiveness of related article search in PubMed. Technical Report CS-TR-4877/UMIACS-TR-2007-36/HCIL-2007-10College Park, MarylandUniversity of Maryland2007.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson S, Walker S. Microsoft Cambridge at TREC-9: filtering track. In: Voorhees EM, Harman DK, editors.Proceedings of the Ninth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-9), Gaithersburg, Maryland: Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2001, pp. 361–368.
   Google Scholar
• Ault T, Yang Y. Information filtering in TREC-9 and TDT-3: a comparative analysis. Information Retrieval 2002;5:159–187. DOI 10.1023/A:101574591176.
   Google Scholar
• Stricker M, Vichot F, Dreyfus G, Wolinski F. Training context-sensitive neural networks with few relevant examples for the trec-9 routing. In: The Ninth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC9), Gaithersburg, Maryland: National Institute of Standards and Technology, special publication; 2000, pp. 257–262.
   Google Scholar
• OMNI Medical Search. Available from: www.omnimedicalsearch.com (accessed 23 April 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Health On the Net foundation. Available from: http://www.hon.ch/MedHunt/ (accessed 23 April 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Lin Y, Li W, Chen K, Liu Y. A document clustering and ranking system for exploring MEDLINE citations. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2007;14:651–661. DOI 10.1197/jamia.M2215.
   Google Scholar
• Lu Z, Kim W, Wilbu W. Evaluating relevance Ranking strategies for MEDLINE retrieval. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2009;16:32–36. DOI 10.1197/jamia.M2935.
   Google Scholar
• PubMed, a service of the US national library of medicine and the national institutes of health. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ (accessed 23 April 2009).
   Google Scholar
• WebMD. Available from: http://www.webmd.com (accessed 23 April 2009).
   Google Scholar
• MedlinePlus, a service of the US national library of medicine and the national institutes of health. Available from: http://medlineplus.gov (accessed 12 June 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Siadaty M, Shu J, Knaus W. Relemed: sentence-level search engine with relevance score for the MEDLINE database of biomedical articles. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2007;7:1. DOI:10.1186/1472-6947-7-1.
   Google Scholar
• Ide N, Loane R, Demner-Fushman D. Essie: a concept-based search engine for structured biomedical text. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2007;14:253–263. DOI 10.1197/jamia.M2233.
   Google Scholar
• Ruch GP, Joubert M, Uziel P, Strauss A, Thonnet M, Baud R, Spahni S, Weber P, Bonal J. Health search engine with e-document analysis for reliable search results. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2006;75:73–85.
   Google Scholar
• Dietze H, Schroeder M. GoWeb: a semantic search engine for the life science web. BMC Bioinformatics 2009;10 (Suppl 10):S7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-S10-S7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Library of Medicine. Unified Medical Language System Fact Sheet. Available at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/umls.html (accessed 12 June 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Brin S, Page L. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 1998;30:107–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craswell N, Hawking D, Robertson S, Effective site finding using link anchor information. Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, New Orleans, Louisiana; 2001, pp. 250–257.
   Google Scholar
• Baeza-Yates R. Berthier Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Information RetrievalNew YorkACM press1999.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad K, Gillam L, Tostevin L. Weirdness indexing for logical document extrapolation and retrieval (WILDER). In: Voorhees EM, Harman DK, editors.The 8th Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-8), Washington: National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2000, pp. 717–724.
   Google Scholar
• English Stopword List. Available at: ftp://ftp.cs.cornell.edu/pub/smart/english.stop (accessed 20 June 20 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Lau A, Coiera E. Can cognitive biases during consumer health information searches be reduced to improve decision making? Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2009;16:54–65. DOI 10.1197/jamia. M2557.
   Google Scholar