Estimating the success of e-health collaborative services: the THEMIS framework

References

• Munir SK, Kay S. Seamless information systems for critical care – myth or magic? Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2004;107(Pt 2):1086–90.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao Y. Artifacts and collaborative work in healthcare: methodological, theoretical, and technological implications of the tangible. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2005;38:26–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-Correia RJ, Vieira-Marques PM, Ferreira AM, Almeida FC, Wyatt JC, Costa-Pereira AM. Reviewing the integration of patient data: how systems are evolving in practice to meet patient needs. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2007;7:14.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. Springer series in social psychologyIn: Kuhl JBE, editor. Berlin: Springer; 1985. pp. 11–39.
   Google Scholar
• Davis FD, editor. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Doctoral dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of technology, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Kushniruk AW, Patel VL. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2004 Feb;37:56–76.
   Google Scholar
• May C, Harrison R, MacFarlane A, Williams T, Mair F, Wallace P. Why do telemedicine systems fail to normalize as stable models of service delivery? Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2003;9 (Suppl 1):S25–S26.
   Google Scholar
• Delone WH, Maclean ER. Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 1992;3:60–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLone WH, McLean ER. The Delone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 2003;19:9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks LL, Boles KE. A comprehensive model for evaluating telemedicine. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2004;106:3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor P. Evaluating telemedicine systems and services. Introduction to telemedicineIn: Jaw RC, editor. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press; 1999. pp. 105–120.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson JD, Aydin CE. Overview: theoretical perspectives and methodologies for the evaluation of health care information systems. Evaluaing health care information systemsIn: Anderson JD, Cajj A, editor. Thousands Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994. pp. 5–29.
   Google Scholar
• Catwell L, Sheikh A. Evaluating eHealth interventions: the need for continuous systemic evaluation. PLoS Medicine 2009;6:e1000126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert M. Telehealth success: evaluation framework development. Medinfo 2001;10 (Pt 2):1145–1149.
   Google Scholar
• Seddon PB, Staples S, Patnayakuni R, Bowtell M. Dimensions of information systems success. Communication of the AIS 1999;2:1–60.
   Google Scholar
• Garrity EJ, Sanders GL. Introduction to Information Systems Success Measurement. Information Systems Success MeasurementIn: Garrity EJ, and Sanders DL, editors. Idea Group Publishing; 1998. pp. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte G, Bytheway A, Edwards C. Understanding user perceptions of information systems success. Strategic Informatics Syststem 1997;6:35–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhola HS. Evaluating “Literacy for development” projects, programs and campaigns: evaluation planning, design and implementation, and utilization of evaluation results Hamburg, Germany: UNESCO Institute for Education & DSE-German Foundation for International Developement; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen W, James MJ. Assessment and learning: differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education 1997;4:365–380.
   Google Scholar
• Gortzis LG. Designing and redesigning medical telecare services: a forces-oriented model. Methods of Information in Medicine 2007;46:27–35.
   Google Scholar
• May C. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research 2006;6:86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tung FC, Chang SC, Chou CM. An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2008;77:324–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman CP, Wyatt JC. Evaluation methods in medical informatics. New York: Springer; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Gortzis L, Karnabatidis D, Siablis D, Nikiforidis G. Clinical-oriented collaborative work over web during interventional radiological procedures. Telemedicine and e-Health 2006;12:448–456.
   Google Scholar
• Liatsikos EN, Gortzis L, Nikiforidis G, Barbalias GA. Tele-diagnostic and therapeutic guidance in urology. Journal of Endourology/Endourological Society 2004;18:625–628.
   Google Scholar
• Begun WJ. A causal model of the health care system: a replication. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 1977;18:2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Randers J. Guidelines for model conceptualisation. Elements of the system dynamics methodIn: Randers J, editor. Cambridge: Productivity Press; 1980. pp. 117–139.
   Google Scholar
• Eden C. Using cognitive mapping for strategic options development and analysis (SODA). Rational analysis for a problematic world: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty, and conflictIn: Rosenhead. J, editor. Chiehester, UK: : John Wiley; 1989. pp. 21–42.
   Google Scholar
• INNACT. http://www.ptapde.gr/projects/index.php?id=9&lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Gortzis LG, Bakettas I, Makropoulos C, Graschew G, Nikiforidis G. Portable biomedical devices: a critical issue during telecare services design. Informatics for Health and Social Care 2008;33:91–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gortzis L, Kalogeropoulos A, Alexopoulos D, Nikiforidis G. Optimizing the interventional cardiology facility: services integration in routine workflow. Methods of Information in Medicine 2007;46:344–351.
   Google Scholar
• Gortzis L, Koubias S, Nikiforidis G. Design and implementation of a web-enabled haematological system. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2004;75:221–234.
   Google Scholar
• ISA. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/isa/2000/default.mspx
   Google Scholar
• Legris. P, Ingham. J, Collerette. P. Why do people use information technology? a critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 2003;40:191–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorman C, Deshpande R, Zaltman G. Factors affecting trust in market research relationships. Journal of Marketing 1993;57:81–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann. N. Trust and power. Chichester, England: Wiley; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Symons VJ. A review of information systems evaluation: content, context and process. European Journal of Information Systems 1991;1:205–212.
   Google Scholar
• Donabedian A, editor. An introduction to quality assurance in health care. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Hill AB. The environment and disease: association or causation?Proceedings of Royal Society of Medicine 1965;58:295–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas RM, McMichael AJ. Association or causation: evaluating links between “environment and disease”. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2005;83:792–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hailey D, Ohinmaa A, Roine R. Study quality and evidence of benefit in recent assessments of telemedicine. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2004;10:318–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith AD. Barriers to accepting e-prescribing in the USA. International Journal of Health Care and Quality Assurance 2006;19:158–180.
   Google Scholar
• Luarn P, Lin HH. Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Computers and Human Behavior 2005;21:873–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar