Tools for assessing the quality and accessibility of online health information: initial testing among breast cancer websites

References

• Fox S, Jones S. The social life of health information. 2009. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/8-The-Social-Life-of-Health-Information.aspx [last accessed February 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Cashen MS, Dykes P, Gerber B. eHealth technology and Internet resources: barriers for vulnerable populations. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2004;19:209–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mich L, Franch M, Gaio L. Evaluating and designing web site quality. IEEE Multimedia 2003;10:34–43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Research-based web design & usability guidelines. 2006. Available from: http://usability.gov/guidelines/guidelines_book.pdf [last accessed August 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Web Accessibility Initiative. How to meet WCAG 2.0. 2010. Available from: http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/quickref/ [last accessed August 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Eysenbach GJ, Kohler C. What is the prevalence of health-related searches on the world wide web? Qualitative and quantitative analysis of search engine queries on the internet. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003:225–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Satterlund MJ, McCaul KD, Sandgren AK. Information gathering over time by breast cancer patients. J Med Internet Res 2003;5:e15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Human Services. 2020 Topics and Objectives: Health Communication and Health Information Technology Objectives. 2011. Available from: http://healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.aspx?topicId=18 [last accessed August 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Rubin A, Rubin, R. Interface of personal and mediated communication: fifteen years later. Electronic J Commun 2001;11:1–19
   Google Scholar
• Becker SA. A study of web usability for older adults seeking online health resources. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 2004;11:387–406
   Google Scholar
• Zarcadoolas C, Blanco M, Boyer JF, Pleasant A. Unweaving the web: an exploratory study of low-literate adults' navigating skills on the world wide web. J Health Commun 2002;7:309–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benigeri M, Pluye P. Shortcomings of health information on the internet. Health Promot Int 2003;18:381–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa E. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web. JAMA 2002;287:2691–2700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington P, Nicholas D, Gunter B, et al. Consumer trust in health information on the web. Aslib Proceedings: New Informat Perspect 2004;56:373–82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doshi A, Patrick K, Sallis JF, Calfas K. Evaluation of physical activity web sites for use of behavior change theories. Ann Behav Med 2003;25:105–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evers KE, Prochaska JM, Prochaska JO, et al. Strengths and weaknesses of health behavior change programs on the Internet. J Health Psychol 2003;8:63–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitten P, Smith S, Munday S, LaPlante S. Communication assessment of the most frequented breast cancer websites: evaluation of design and theoretical criteria. J Comput Mediat Commun 2008;13:880–911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA. Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2004
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Education. Digest of education statistics (1985–1986). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, United States Department of Education Center for Statistics; 1986
   Google Scholar
• Elliott JO, Charyton C, Long L. A health literacy assessment of the National Epilepsy Foundation Web site. Epilepsy Behav 2007;11:525–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neuhauser L, Rothschild R, Rodríguez FM. MyPyramid.gov: assessment of literacy, cultural and linguistic factors in the USDA food pyramid web site. J Nutr Educ Behav 2007;39:7
   Google Scholar
• Whitten P, Nazione S, Smith SW, LaPlante C. An examination into audience targeting and the use of storytelling or statistical evidence on breast cancer websites. Patient Educ Counsel 2011;85:e59–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friedman DB, Kao EK. A comprehensive assessment of the difficulty level and cultural sensitivity of online cancer prevention resources for older minority men. Prev Chronic Dis 2008;5:1–11
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. A first look at the literacy of America's adults in the 21st century. 2006. Available from: http://nces.ed.gov/NAAL/PDF/2006470.PDF [last accessed August 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Croft RD, Peterson MW. An evaluation of the quality and contents of asthma education on the World Wide Web. CHEST 2002;121:1301–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson FL, Baker LM, Brown-Syed C, Goilop C. An analysis of the readability and cultural sensitivity of information on the National Cancer Institute's web site: CancerNet. Oncol Nurs Forum 2000;27:1403–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHealth literacy: essential skills for consumer health in a networked world. J Med Internet Res 2006;8:e9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klare GR. The measurement of readability. Ames (IA): State University Press; 1963
   Google Scholar
• Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP Jr, Rogers RL, Chissom BS. Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count, and Flesch reading ease formula) for Navy enlisted personnel (Research Branch Report 8–75). Millington (TN): Naval Technical Training Command; 1975
   Google Scholar
• Golbeck AL, Ahlers-Schmidt CR, Paschal AM, Dismuke SE. A definition and operational framework for health numeracy. Am J Prev Med 2005;29:375–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catts R, Lau J. Towards information literacy indicators. 2008. Available from: www.uis.unesco.org/Library/Documents/wp08_InfoLit_en.pdf [last accessed February 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Mason J, McMorrow R. YACLD (Yet another computer literacy definition). J Comput Sci Coll 2006;21:94–100
   Google Scholar
• Balen RM, Jewesson PJ. Pharmacist computer skills and needs assessment survey. J Med Internet Res 2004;6:e11
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone S. Media literacy and the challenge of new information and technologies. Commun Rev 2004;1:3–14
   Google Scholar
• Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs. Health literacy: report of the Council on Scientific Affairs. JAMA 1999;281:552–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnicow K, Baranowski T, Ahluwalia JS, Braithwaite RL. Cultural sensitivity in public health: defined and demystified. Ethn Dis 1999;9:10–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eichner J, Dullabh P. Accessible health information technology (IT) for populations with limited literacy: a guide for developers and purchasers of health IT. 2007. Available from: http://healthit.ahrq.gov/portal/server.pt/gateway/PTARGS_0_3882_803031_0_0_18/LiteracyGuide.pdf [last accessed August 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Holum A, Gahala J. Critical issue: using technology to enhance literacy instruction. 2001. Available from: http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/reading/li300.htm [last accessed August 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Watts M, Lloyd C. The use of innovative ICT in the active pursuit of literacy. J Comp Assist Learn 2003;20:50–8
   Google Scholar
• National Cancer Institute. SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Breast. 2011. Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html [last accessed October 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Linssen C, Schook RM, The A, et al. A website on lung cancer: who are users and what are looking for? J Thorac Oncol 2007;2:813–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson PF, Allee N, Grove S, Hill S. Medical library association encyclopedia guide to searching and finding health information on the Internet. 1999. Available from: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~pfa/pro/courses/WebEvalNew.pdf [last accessed August 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Summers K, Summers M. Reading and navigational strategies of web users with lower literacy skills. Paper presented at the 68th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology; 2005; Charlotte, NC
   Google Scholar
• Ahlers-Schmidt CR., Goldbeck AL, Paschal A, et al. Breast cancer counts: numeracy in breast cancer information on the web. J Cancer Educ 2006;21:95–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters E, Hibbard J, Slovic P, Dieckman N. Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk–benefit information. Health Aff 2007;26:741–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Educational Testing Services. Digital transformation: a framework for ICT literacy. A report of the international ICT literacy panel. 2002. Available from: http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/Information_and_Communication_Technology_Literacy/ictreport.pdf [last accessed August 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Curtis PA, Gardner FA, Litzenberg KK. Measuring computer literacy in colleges of agriculture: results, conclusions, and implications. 1986. Available from: http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED286474.pdf [last accessed August 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Human Services. Health Literacy. 2008. Available from: http://www.hrsa.gov/healthliteracy/ [last accessed August 2008]
   Google Scholar
• Ratzan SC, Parker RM. Introduction. In: Selden CR, Zorn M, Ratzan SC, Parker RM, eds. National Library of Medicine current bibliographies in medicine: health literacy. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2000:V–VI
   Google Scholar
• Center for Media Literacy. Literacy for the 21st Century: An Overview & Orientation Guide to Media Literacy Education. 2003. Available from: http://www.medialit.org/reading_room/article540.html [last accessed August 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Media Literacy Network. Media literacy key concepts. 2008. Available from: http://www.media-awareness.ca/english/teachers/media_literacy/key_concept.cfm [last accessed August 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Guidry JJ, Larke P, Walker VD, et al. Cancer prevention materials for African Americans Project. 1996. Available from: http://www.texascancer.info/pcemat/contents.html [last accessed August 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan D. Nielsen NetRatings search engine ratings. 2006. Available from: http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2067079/Nielsen-NetRatings-Search-Engine-Ratings [last accessed August 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Potter WJ, Levine-Donnerstein D. Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. J Appl Commun Res 1999;27:258–84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhillon G, Coss D, Hackney R. Interpreting the role of disruptive technologies in e-business. Logistics Inform Manag 2001;14:163–70
   Google Scholar
• Velicer WF, Prochaska JO, Fava JL, et al. Smoking cessation and stress management: applications of the transtheoretical model of behavior change. Homeostasis 1998;38:216–33
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J, eds. Action control: from cognition to behavior. New York: Springer; 1985:11–39
   Google Scholar
• Witte K. Putting the fear back in fear appeals: the extended parallel process model. Commun Monographs 1992;59:329–49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine AB, Ary DA, Grove DA, Gilfillan-Morton L. The effectiveness of an interactive multimedia program to influence eating habits. Health Educ Res 2004;19:290–305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout PA, Villegas J, Kim H. Enhancing learning through use of interactive tools on health-related websites. Health Educ Res 2001;16:721–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988
   Google Scholar
• Paasche-Orlow MK. The challenges of informed consent for low-literate populations. In: Swartzberg J, VanGeese J, Wang C, eds. Understanding health literacy: implications for medicine and public health. Chicago (IL): American Medical Association Press; 2005:119–40
   Google Scholar