Requirements of older adults for a daily use of an internet-based cognitive training platform

References

• Kramer AF and Willis SL. Enhancing the cognitive vitality of older adults. Curr Direct Psychol Sci 2002;11:173–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance DE, Webb NM and Marceaux JCet al. Mental stimulation, neural plasticity, and aging: directions for nursing research and practice. J Neurosci Nursing 2008;40:241–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitenweg JIV, Murre JMJ, Richard Ridderinkhof K. Brain training in progress: a review of trainability in healthy seniors. Front Hum Neurosci 2012;6:183. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00183
   Google Scholar
• Hertzog C, Kramer AF, Wilson RS and Lindenberger U. Enrichment effects on adult cognitive development: can the functional capacity of older adults be preserved and enhanced? Psychol Sci Public Interest, Supplement 2008;9:1–65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lustig C, Shah P, Seidler R and Reuter-Lorenz PA. Aging, training, and the brain: a review and future directions. Neuropsychol Rev 2009;19:504–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp KV, Walsh SJ and Snyder PJ. Immediate and delayed effects of cognitive interventions in healthy elderly: a review of current literature and future directions. Alzheimer’s Dement 2009;5:50–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmiedek F, Bauer C and Lövdén Met al. Förderung kognitiver Aktivität im Alter:internet-basierte Trainingsprogramme. In: Lindenberger U, Nehmer J, Steinhagen-Thiessen E and Delius J, eds. Altern und Technik: Altern in Deutschland. 1st ed. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft; 2011:35–52
   Google Scholar
• Ghisletta P, Bickel J-F and Lövdén M. Does activity engagement protect against cognitive decline in old age? Methodological and analytical considerations. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2006;61:253–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson RS, Scherr PA and Schneider JAet al. Relation of cognitive activity to risk of developing Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2007;69:1911–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarmeas N, Levy G and Tang M-Xet al. Influence of leisure activity on the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 2001;57:2236–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassuk SS, Glass TA and Berkman LF. Social disengagement and incident cognitive decline in community-dwelling elderly persons. Ann Internal Med 1999;131:165–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fratiglioni L, Wang H-X and Ericsson Ket al. Influence of social network on occurrence of dementia: a community-based longitudinal study. Lancet 2000;355:1315–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lövdén M, Ghisletta P and Lindenberger U. Social participation attenuates decline in perceptual speed in old and very old age. Psychol Aging 2005;20:423–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James BD, Wilson RS, Barnes LL and Bennett DA. Late-life social activity and cognitive decline in old age. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2011;17:998–1005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger KR, Wilson RS and Kamenetsky JMet al. Social engagement and cognitive function in old age. Exp Aging Res 2009;35:45–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson RS, Krueger KR and Arnold SEet al. Loneliness and risk of Alzheimer disease. Archives Gen Psychiatr 2007;64:234–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeggi SM, Buschkuehl M, Jonides J and Perrig WJ. Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2008;105:6829–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahncke HW, Connor BB and Appelman Jet al. Memory enhancement in healthy older adults using a brain plasticity-based training program: a randomized, controlled study. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2006;103:12523–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadley VG, Benz RL and Ball KKet al. Development and evaluation of home-based speed-of-processing training for older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:757–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball K, Edwards JD and Ross LA. The impact of speed of processing training on cognitive and everyday functions. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2007;62:19–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kueider AM, Parisi JM, Gross AL and Rebok GW. Computerized cognitive training with older adults: a systematic review. PLoS One 2012;7:e40588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixiera CVL, Gobbi LTB and Corazza DIet al. Non-pharmalogical interventions on cognitive functions in older people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Arch Gerontol Geriat 2012;54:175–80
   Google Scholar
• Winblad B, Palmer K and Kivipelto Met al. Mild cognitive impairment – beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Int Med 2004;256:240–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen RC, Parisi JE and Dickson DWet al. Neuropathologic features of amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol Psychiatr 2006;63:665–72
   Google Scholar
• Belleville S, Gilbert B and Fontaine Fet al. Improvement of episodic memory in persons with mild cognitive impairment and health older adults: evidence from a cognitive intervention program. Dement Geriat Cognit Disorders 2006;22:486–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talassi E, Guerreschi M and Feriani Met al. Effectiveness of a cognitive rehabilitation program in mild dementia (MD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI): a case control study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2007;44:391–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly T. What Is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software; 2005. Available from: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html via the INTERNET [last accessed 24 Sep 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Pfeil U, Arjan R and Zaphiris P. Age differences in online social networking – a study of user profiles and the social capital divide among teenagers and older users in MySpace. Comput Hum Behav 2009;25:643–54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie B. Older Chinese, the internet, and well-being. Care Manage J: J Case Manage 2007;8:33–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Namazi KH, McClintic M. Computer use among elderly persons in long-term care facilities. Educ Gerontol 2003;29:535–50
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger PT and Xie B. Developing online community accessibility guidelines for persons with disabilities and older adults. J Disabil Policy Stud 2009;20:55–63
   Google Scholar
• Xie B, Watkins I, Golbeck J and Huang M. Understanding and changing older adults’ perceptions and learning of social media. Educ Gerontol 2012;38:282–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leist AK. Social media use of older adults: a mini-review. Gerontology 2013;59:378–84
   Google Scholar
• Guo B, Bricout JC and Huang J. A common open space or a digital divide? A social model perspective on the online disability community in China. Disabil Soc 2005;20:49–66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotten SR, Anderson W and McCullough B. The impact of ICT use on loneliness and contact with others among older adults. Gerontechnology 2012;11:39 (1–13)
   Google Scholar
• Madden M. Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project 2010. Available from: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Older-Adults-and-Social-Media.aspx via the INTERNET [last accessed 24 Sep 2013]
   Google Scholar
• BITKOM. Soziale Netzwerke. Eine repräsentative Untersuchung zur Nutzung sozialer Netzwerke im Internet 2011. Available from: http://www.bitkom.org/files/documents/SozialeNetzwerke.pdf via the INTERNET [last accessed 24 Sep 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Lehtinen V, Näsänen J and Sarvas R. “A little silly and empty-headed” – older adults’ understandings of social networking sites. BCS-HCI 2009 Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology 2009;45–54
   Google Scholar
• Stadelhofer C and Marquard M. SeniorInnen und Online-Medien. Zeitschrift für Medienpädagogik 2004;48:9–17
   Google Scholar
• Kerres M. Potenziale von Web 2.0 nutzen. In: Hohenstein A and Wilbers K, eds. Handbuch E-Learning. München: Fachverlag Deutscher Wirtschaftsdienst; 2006 Available from: http://mediendidaktik.uni-due.de/sites/default/files/web20-a_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs Center on Lifelong Learning and Institutional Development. Evaluation der kognitiven trainings im Rahmen des landesprogramms. Brandenburg: Akademie 50plus; 2011:1–74
   Google Scholar
• Sayago S, Blat J. About the relevance of accessibility barriers in the everyday interactions of older people with the web. Proceedings of the 2009 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibililty (W4A). W4A’09; 2009; New York, NY: ACM; 104–13
   Google Scholar
• Brajnik G, Yesilada Y and Harper S. Web accessibility guideline aggregation for older users and its validation. Univ Access Inform Soc 2011;10:403–23
   Google Scholar
• Result. Ergebnisbericht zur Studie “Web 2.0 und die Generation 50+”; 2007. Available from: http://www.result.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/ergebnisbericht-zur-studie-web-2-0-und-die-generat.pdf via the INTERNET [last accessed 24 Sep 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Morrell RW, Mayhorn CB and Echt KV. Why older adults use and do not use the internet. In: Burdick DC and Kwon S, eds. Gerotechnology: research and practice in technology and aging. 1st ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2004: 71–85
   Google Scholar
• Bennett J and Loetscher S. How online communities can make a contribution to the social integration of persons aged 60 to 75. An exploratory study. Bern: Zeix AG; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Ofcom Consumer Panel. Older people & communications technology qualitative research. London, UK: Ofcom Consumer Panel; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Kirchmair R. Bedürfnisse und Anforderungen der Best Agers an IT-Produkte. In: Kimpeler S, ISI KF-I für SI, Baier E, eds. IT-basierte Produkte und Dienste für ältere Menschen – Nutzeranforderungen und Techniktrends: Tagungsband zur FAZIT Fachtagung “Best Agers” in der Informationsgesellschaft. Stuttgart, Germany: IRB Verlag; 2006:31–41.
   Google Scholar
• Xie B, Huang M and Watkins I. Technology and retirement life: a systematic review of the literature on older adults and social media. In: Wang M, ed. The Oxford handbook of retirement. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2012
   Google Scholar
• IFS. Usability and Ergonomics Considerations on eLearning of Older Adults. 2007 [cited 2013 March 22]. Available from: http://www.seniorlearning.eu/site/Output%202%20-%20usability%20and%20ergonomics%20report.pdf [last accessed 28 Jun 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Majcen K. Soziale Interaktion für die Zielgruppe 60+ - Das Projekt ALICE. Scribd 2011. Available from: http://de.scribd.com/doc/70998330/Soziale-Interaktion-fur-die-Zielgruppe-60-Das-Projekt-ALICE [last accessed 28 Jun 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Yong GJ. Older adults in an aging society and social computing: a research agenda. Intl J Hum – Comp Interact 2010;26:1122–46
   Google Scholar
• Neyer FJ, Felber J and Gebhardt C. Entwicklung und Validierung einer Kurzskala zur Erfassung von Technikbereitschaft. Diagnostica 2012;58:87–99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring P. Qualitative inhaltsanalyse: grundlagen und techniken. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P and Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:349–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilms I and Mogensen J. Dissimilar outcomes of apparently similar procedures as a challenge to clinical neurorehabilitation and basic research: When the same is not the same. Neuro Rehabil 2011;29:221–7
   Google Scholar
• Botella C, Etchemendy E and Castilla Det al. An e-health system for the elderly (Butler Project): a pilot study on acceptance and satisfaction. Cyberpsychol Behav: Impact Internet, Multimedia Virtual Reality Behav Soc 2009;12:255–62
   Google Scholar
• Koenig ST, Dunser A, Bartneck C, et al. Development of virtual environments for patient-centered rehabilitation held at the International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation; 2011 Jun 27–30; Zurich
   Google Scholar