Patients' contribution to the development of a web-based plan for integrated care – a participatory design study

References

• Andersson ET and Wilson J. Healthy democracy: involving people in health and social care. London: INVOLVE and NHS Centre for Involvement; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Serrano-Aguilar P, Trujillo-Martín MM and Ramos-Goñi JMet al. Patient involvement in health research: a contribution to a systematic review on the effectiveness of treatments for degenerative ataxias. Soc Sci Med 2009;69:920–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägglund M, Scandurra I and Koch S. Scenarios to capture work processes in shared homecare: from analysis to application. Int J Med Inform 2010;79:126–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni P and Ozturk Y. MphASiS: mobile patient healthcare and sensor information system. J Netw Comput Appl 2011;34:402–17
   Google Scholar
• Lauriks S, Reinersmann A and Van der Roest HGet al. Review of ICT-based services for identified unmet needs in people with dementia. Ageing Res Rev 2007;6:223–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorr D, Bonner LM and Cohen ANet al. Informatics systems to promote improved care for chronic illness: a literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:156–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson L, Brittain K and Lindsay Set al. Keeping in Touch Everyday (KITE) project: developing assistive technologies with people with dementia and their carers to promote independence. Int Psychogeriatr 2009;21:494–502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leichsenring K. Developing integrated health and social care services for older persons in Europe. Int J Integr Care 2004;4:e10 (1–15)
   Google Scholar
• Russell G, Thille P, Hogg W and Lemelin J. Beyond fighting fires and chasing tails? Chronic illness care plans in Ontario, Canada. Ann Fam Med 2008;6:146–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normann T, Sandvin JT and Thommesen Het al. A holistic approach to rehabilitation. Oslo: Kommuneforlaget; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Helse-og-omsorgstjenesteloven. [Municipal Health and Care Services Act]. Oslo: Norway; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Forskrift om habilitering og rehabilitering individuell plan og koordinator. [Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services, Regulations for Rehabilitation, Individual care plan and Coordinator]. Oslo: Norway; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Pasient -og brukerrettighetsloven. [Patients' rights act]. Oslo: Norway; 1999/2012
   Google Scholar
• Spesialisthelsetjenesteloven. [Spezialized Health Services Act]. Oslo: Norway; 1999
   Google Scholar
• Helsedirektoratet. Individuell plan, veileder til forskrift om individuell plan [Individual care plan guidelines]. Oslo: Norway; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Bjerkan J, Richter M, Grimsmo A, et al. Integrated care in Norway: the state of affairs years after regulation by law. Int J Integr Care 2011;11:1–8
   Google Scholar
• Garg AX, Adhikari NJ and McDonald Het al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293:1223–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salazar M, Stinson K and Sillau Set al. Web-based electronic health records improve data completeness and reduce medical discrepancies in employee vaccination programs. Infect Contr Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:84–6
   Google Scholar
• Stillman L, Kethers S, French R and Lombard D. Adapting corporate modelling for community informatics. VINE: J Inform Knowl Manage Syst 2009;39:259–74
   Google Scholar
• Thommesen H, Norman T and Sandvin JT. Individual plan – et sesam, sesam? [Individual plan, a sesame, sesame open up?]. Oslo: Kommuneforlaget; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Kvamme I, Hodne T, Jentoft N, Nilsen ACE. Plan med plan? Om bruk av individuell plan i individuelt oppfølgingsarbeid. [Having a plan for the plan? The use of individual care plan in individual follow up activities]. Kristiansand: Agderforskning; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Bergold J and Thomas S. Participatory research methods: a methodological approach in motion. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: qualitative social research; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Pilemalm S and Timpka T. Third generation participatory design in health informatic:making user participation applicable to large-scale information system projects. J Biomed Inform 2008;41:327–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulliksen J, Göransson B and Boivie Iet al. Key principles for user-centred systems design. Behav Inform Technol 2003;22:397–409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders EBN. From user-centered to participatory design approaches. In: Frascara J, ed. Design and the social sciences: making connections. London: Taylor & Francis Books Limited; 2002:1–8
   Google Scholar
• Holmer J, Starrin B. Deltagarorienterad forskning. [Participant-oriented research]. Lund, Sweden: Studentliteratur; 1993
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen J, Robertson T. Routledge handbook of participatory design: Routledge; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Ives B and Olson MH. User involvement and MIS success: a review of research. Manag Sci 1984;30:586–603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpay LL, Toussaint PJ and Ezendam NPMet al. Easing internet access of health information for elderly users. Health Inform J 2004;10:185–94
   Google Scholar
• De Rouck S, Jacobs A and Leys M. A methodology for shifting the focus of e-health support design onto user needs: a case in the homecare field. Int J Med Inform 2008;77:589–601
   Google Scholar
• Holum LC. “Individual plan” in a user-oriented and empowering perspective: a qualitative study of “individual plans” in Norwegian mental health services. Nordic Psychol 2012;64:45–57
   Google Scholar
• Kjellevoll A. Retten til individuell plan. [Being entitled to individual care plan]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Kushniruk A, Turner P. Who's users? Participation and empowerment in socio-technical approaches to health IT developments. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011;164:280–5
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges and guidelines. Lancet 2001;358:483–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale A and Mason J. Understanding social research: thinking creatively about method. Los Angeles (CA): Sage Publications; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Shared understanding of the qualitative research process: guidelines for the medical-researcher. Fam Pract 1993;10:201–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon MP, Desmartis M and Labrecque Met al. Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. J Med Syst 2012;36:241–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushniruk AW and Patel VL. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems. J Biomed Informat 2004;37:56–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Gagnon J, et al. Introducing the patient's perspective in hospital health technology assessment (HTA): the views of HTA producers, hospital managers and patients. Health Expect 2012. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1111/hex.12010
   Google Scholar
• Berg M. Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach. Int J Med Inform 1999;55:87–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall C and Rossman GB. Designing qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Aanestad M. IKT for bedre samhandling: løsning eller problem? [ICT for improved coordination: a solution or a problem?]. IKT og samhandling i helsesektoren: digitale lappetepper eller sømløs integrasjon? Trondheim: Tapir akademisk forl.; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Kujala S. Effective user involvement in product development by improving the analysis of user needs. Behav Inform Technol 2008;27:457–73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen J. Usability engineering. Boston (MA): Academic Press; 1993
   Google Scholar
• Sauer J and Sonderegger A. Methodological issues in product evaluation: the influence of testing environment and task scenario. Appl Ergon 2011;42:487–94
   Google Scholar
• Mair FS, May C and O'Donnell Cet al. Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review. Bull World Health Organ 2012;90:357–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau-Walker M. Cardiac rehabilitation: the importance of patient expectations – a practitioner survey. J Clin Nurs 2004;13:177–84
   Google Scholar
• Holloway S, Porteous M and Cetnarskyj Ret al. Patient satisfaction with two different models of cancer genetic services in south-east Scotland. Br J Cancer 2004;90:582–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsson IE, Sahlsten M and Sjöström Bet al. Patient participation in nursing care from a patient perspective: a grounded theory study. Scand J Caring Sci 2007;21:313–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dart JM and Gallois C. Community desires for an online health information strategy. Aust Health Rev 2010;34:467–76
   Google Scholar
• Askheim OP. Empowerment i helse- og sosialfaglig arbeid: floskel, styringsverktøy, eller frigjøringsstrategi? Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Hedlund M and Landstad BJ. The construction of self-help in Norwegian health policy. Int J Self Help Self Care 2012;6:65–87
   Google Scholar
• Abdullah R, Eri ZD, Talib AM. A model of knowledge management system in managing knowledge of software testing environment. Software Engineering (MySEC), 2011 5th Malaysian Conference in 2011:229–33
   Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Légaré F, Weijden TVD, et al. Arduous implementation: does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practice. Implement Sci 2008;31–9
   Google Scholar
• Sandaunet AG. The challenge of fitting in: non-participation and withdrawal from an online self-help group for breast cancer patients. Sociol Health Ill 2008;30:131–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagiroglu Ö and Özturan M. Implementation difficulties of hospital information systems. Inform Technol J 2006;5:892–9
   Google Scholar