Framing the implementation process of video conferencing in discharge planning–According to staff experience

References

• Larsson K. Call for discharge planning–how did it go? Stockholm: The National Board of Health and Welfare; 2007
   Google Scholar
• The National Board of Health and Welfare. Rules about handling information and records in medical care. Vol. 14 (Affairs 2008:14). Stockholm: The National Board of Health and Welfare; 2008
   Google Scholar
• The National Board of Health and Welfare. Social interaction at entry and discharge of patients in closed care. Vol 27 (Affairs 2005:27). Stockholm: The National Board of Health and Welfare; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Law of Health and Medical Services 1982:763. Stockholm: Swedish Government; 1982. Available from: https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/Dokument-Lagar/Lagar/Svenskforfattningssamling/Halso-och-sjukvardslag-1982_sfs-1982-763/ [last accessed 4 Oct 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Hofflander M, Nilsson L, Eriksén S, Borg C. Discharge planning: narrated by nursing staff in primary healthcare and their concerns about using video conferencing in the planning session–an interview study. J Nurs Educ Pract 2013;3:88–98
   Google Scholar
• Lundh U, Williams S. The challenges of improving discharge planning in Sweden and the UK: different but the same. J Clin Nurs 1997;6:435–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordmark S, Soderberg S, Skar L. Information exchange between registered nurses and district nurses during the discharge planning process: cross-sectional analysis of survey data. Inform Health Soc Care 2014;40:23–44
   Google Scholar
• Wong E, Yam C, Cheung A, et al. Barriers to effective discharge planning: a qualitative study investigating the perspectives of frontline healthcare professionals. Bmc Health Serv Res 2011;11:242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunnion ME, Kelly B. Discharge of the older person from the emergency department–the perceptions of health professionals. Int J Older People Nurs 2007;2:102–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cannaby A-M, Parker SG, Cheater F, Baker R. Identifying barriers to improving the process of discharging patients from hospital. Primary Health Care Res Dev 2003;4:49–56
   Google Scholar
• Helgesson A, Johansson U-B, Walther-Stenmark K, et al. Coordinated care planning for elderly patients using videoconferencing. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11:85–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundén K. Evaluation of the use of videoconferences for healthcare planning. Health Informatics J 2001;7:71–80
   Google Scholar
• Kane B, Luz S. Multidisciplinary medical team meetings: an analysis of collaborative working with special attention to timing and teleconferencing. Comput Supported Coop Work 2006;15:501–35
   Google Scholar
• Tyler A, Boyer A, Martin S, et al. Development of a discharge readiness report within the electronic health record–a discharge planning tool. J Hospital Med 2014;9:533–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson A, Street A. Improving networks between acute care nurses and an aged care assessment team. J Clin Nurs 2004;13:486–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunchak C, Tannenbaum D, Roberts M, et al. Closing the circle of care: implementation of a web-based communication tool to improve emergency department discharge communication with family physicians. CJEM 2014;16:1–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forsner T, Wistedt A, Brommels M, et al. Supported local implementation of clinical guidelines in psychiatry: a two-year follow-up. Implementation Sci 2010;5:4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnes B. Emergent change and planned change–competitors or allies? The case of XYZ construction. Int J Operations Prod Manag 2004;24:886–902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin G, Belanger-Gravel A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Healthcare professionals' intentions and behaviours: a systematic review of studies based on social cognitive theories. Implementation Sci 2008;3:36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peddle K. Telehealth in context: socio-technical barriers to telehealth use in Labrador, Canada. Comput Supported Coop Work 2007;16:595–614
   Google Scholar
• Davies H, Nutley S. Healthcare: evidence to the fore. What works? Bristol, UK: Policy Press; 2012:43–67
   Google Scholar
• Grimshaw J, Russell I. Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines. I: developing scientifically valid guidelines. Qual Health Care 1993;2:243
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP. Is evidence-based implementation of evidence-based care possible? Med J Aus 2004;180:S50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damschroder L, Aron D, Keith R, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Sci 2009;4:50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles MP, Armstrong D, Baker R, et al. An implementation research agenda. Implementation Sci 2009;4:18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen P. Implementation, theory and application in health and welfare. 1st ed. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, et al. Diffusion of innovations in health service organisations: a systematic literature review. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Grol R. Improving patient care: the implementation of change in health care. 2nd ed. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell; 2013
   Google Scholar
• Nutley SM, Walter I, Davies HTO. Using evidence: how research can inform public services. Bristol, UK: Policy Press; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1277–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 2008;62:107–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter WJ, Levine-Donnerstein D. Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. J Appl Commun Res 1999;27:258–84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May CR, Mair FS, Dowrick CF, Finch TL. Process evaluation for complex interventions in primary care: understanding trials using the normalization process model. BMC Family Pract 2007;8:42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinch TJ, Bijker WE. The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies Sci 1984;14:399–441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson L, Hofflander M, Eriksen S, Borg C. The importance of interaction in the implementation of information technology in health care: a symbolic interactionism study on the meaning of accessibility. Inform Health Soc Care 2012;37:277–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang H. Organizational culture. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 1999
   Google Scholar
• Schoen C, Osborn R, Huynh PT, et al. On the front lines of care: primary care doctors' office systems, experiences, and views in seven countries. Health Affairs (Project Hope) 2006;25:w555–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øvretveit J, Scott T, Rundall TG, et al. Improving quality through effective implementation of information technology in healthcare. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:259–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fejes A. Governing nursing through reflection: a discourse analysis of reflective practices. J Adv Nurs 2008;64:243–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Woerkom M. Critical reflection as a rationalistic ideal. Adult Educ Q 2010;60:339–56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön D. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Adlershot: Ashgate; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Balka E. Getting the big picture: the macro-politics of information system development (and failure) in a Canadian hospital. Methods Information Med 2003;42:324–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg I, Tyrstrup M. Well then–what now? An everyday approach to managerial leadership. Leadership 2010;6:353–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolman LG, Deal TE. New perspectives on organization and leadership. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H. Rounding out the manager's job. Sloan Manag Rev 1994;36:11–26
   Google Scholar
• Hickey G, Kipping C. A multi-stage approach to the coding of data from open-ended questions. Nurse Res 1996;4:81–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, London: Sage Publications Inc.; 1985
   Google Scholar
• Mishler EG. Validation in inquiry-guided research: the role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educ Rev 1990;60:415–43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnard P. Writing a qualitative research report. Nurse Educ Today 2004;24:174–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar