Co-designing technologies in the context of hypertension care: Negotiating participation and technology use in design meetings

References

• Bovaird T. Beyond engagement and participation: user and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review 2007;67:846–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunston R, Lee A, Boud D, Brodie, P, Chiarella, M. Co-production and health system reform – from re-imagining to re-making. Australian Journal of Public Administration 2009;68:39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson E, Tritter J, Wilson R, editors. Healthy democracy: the future of involvement in health and social care. London: Involve and NHS National Centre for Improvement; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Dunston R. Arrangements of co-production in healthcare. In: Fenwick T, Nerland M, eds. Reconceptualising professional learning. Sociomaterial knowledges, practices and responsibilities. London: Routledge; 2014. pp. 140–54.
   Google Scholar
• Bate P, Mendel P, Robert G. Organizing for quality: the improvement journeys of leading hospitals in Europe and the United States. Abingdon: Radcliffe; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Langstrup H. Chronic care infrastructures and the home. Sociology of Health & Illness 2013;35:1008–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehoux P, Saint-Arnaud J, Richard L. The use of technology at home: what patient manuals say and sell vs. what patients face and fear. Sociology of Health & Illness 2004;26:617–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pols J, Willems D. Innovation and evaluation: taming and unleashing telecare technology. Sociology of Health & Illness 2011;33:484–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranerup A, Hallberg I. Actors and intentions in the development process of a mobile phone platform for self-management of hypertension. Informatics for Health and Social Care 2014;1–20. doi:10.3109/17538157.2014.924948.
   Google Scholar
• Drevenhorn E, Bengtson A, Allen JK, Säljö R, Kjellgren KI. Counselling on lifestyle factors in hypertension care after training on the stages of change model. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 2007;6:46–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kjellgren K I, Svensson S, Ahlner J, Säljö R. Anithypertensive treatment and patient autonomy – the follow-up appointment as a resource for care. Patient Education and Counseling 2000;40:39–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson S, Linell P, Kjellgren KI. Making sense of blood pressure values in follow-up appointments for hypertension. International Journal of Cardiology 2008;123:108–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah SGS, Robinson I. User involvement in healthcare technology development and assessment: structured literature review. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 2006;19:500–15.
   Google Scholar
• Skeels MM, Unruh Kenton T, Powell C, Pratt W. Catalyzing social support for breast cancer patients. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2010:173–82.
   Google Scholar
• Revenäs Å, Opava CH, Martin C, Demmelmaier I, Keller C, Åsenlöf P. Development of a web-based and mobile app to support physical activity in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the second step of a co-design process. JMIR Research Protocols 2015;4(1):e22. doi:10.2196/resprot.3795.
   Google Scholar
• Lucero R, Tsimicalis B, Sheehan B, Yen P, Velez O, Nobile-Hernandez D, Tiase V. Identifying consumer’s needs of health information technology through an innovative participatory design approach among English- and Spanish-speaking urban older adults. Appl Clin Inform 2014 Dec 3;5(4):943–57. eCollection 2014. doi:10.4338/ACI-2014-07-RA-0058.
   Google Scholar
• Pagliari C, Sloan D, Gregor P, Sullivan F, Detmer D, Kahan JP, Oortwijn W, MacGillivray S. What is eHealth (4): a scoping exercise to map the field. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2005;7:e9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blake H. Innovation in practice. British Journal of Community Nursing 2008;13:160–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blake H. Mobile phone technology in chronic disease management. Nursing Standard 2008:23:43–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lehoux P, Hivon M. The worlds and modalities of engagement of design participants: a qualitative case study of three medical innovations. Design Studies 2011;32:313–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarhus, R, Ballegaard SA, Hansen TR. The eDiary: bridging home and hospital through healthcare technology. In: Balka E, Ciolfi L, Simone C, Tellioglu H, Wagner I, eds. ECSCW 2009. London: Springer; 2009. pp. 63–83.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai CC, Lee G, Raab F, Norman GJ, Sohn T, Griswold WG, Patrick K. Usability and feasibility of PmEB: a mobile phone application for monitoring real time caloric balance. Mobile Networks and Applications 2007;12:173–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salameh O. A mobile-phone SMS-based system for diabetes self management. International Arab Journal of e-Technology 2012;3:161–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hallberg I, Taft C, Ranerup A, Bengtsson U, Hoffmann M, Höfer S, Kasperowski D, Mäkitalo Å, Lundin M, Ring L, Rosenqvist U, Kjellgren K. Phases in development of an interactive mobile phone-based system to support self-management of hypertension. Integrated Blood Pressure Control 2014;7:19–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sparud-Lundin C, Josefsson U, Berg M, Hellstrom A-L, Koinberg I, Jenholt Nolbris M, Ranerup A, Skarsater I. Use of participatory design in the development of person-centred web-based support for persons with long-term illness. European Journal for Person Centered Healthcare 2013;1:369–80.
   Google Scholar
• Linell P. Approaching dialogue: talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch JV. Mediation. In: Daniels H, Cole M, Wertsch JV, editors. The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. pp. 178–92.
   Google Scholar
• Mäkitalo Å. Professional learning and the materiality of social practice. Journal of Education and Work 2012;25:59–78.
   Google Scholar
• Säljö R. Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2010;26:43–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin C, Duranti A. Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Campion P, Langdon, M. Achieving multiple topic shifts in primary care medical consultations: a conversation analysis study in UK general practice. Sociology of Health & Illness 2004;26:81–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudak PL, Maynard DM. An interactional approach to conceptualising small talk in medical interactions. Sociology of Health & Illness 2011;33:634–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkitalo Å. Categorisation. In: Hall C, Juhila K, Matarese M, van Nijnatten C, editors. Analysing social work communication: discourse in practice. London: Routledge; 2014. pp. 25–43.
   Google Scholar