Effects of audio-visual information and mode of speech on listener perceptions of alaryngeal speakers

References

• Ainsworth, W., Singh, W. (1992). Perceptual comparison of neoglottal, oesophageal, and normal speech. Folia Phoniatrica, 44, 297–307.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barocas, R., Karoly, P. (1972). Effects of physical appearance on social responsiveness. Psychological Reports, 31, 495–500.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blood, G. W., Blood, I. M., Danhauer, J. L. (1978). Listeners' impressions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. Journal of Communication Disorders, 11, 513–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blood, G., Hyman, M. (1977). Children's perceptions of nasal resonance. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 42, 446–448.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Casper, J., C., Colton, R. H. (1993). Clinical manual for laryngectomy and head/neck cancer rehabilitationSan Diego, CA: Singular Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (1988). Qualitative inquiry and research designThousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Evitts, P., Searl, J. (2006). Reaction times of normal listeners to alaryngeal speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 1380–1390.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evitts, P., Gabel, R., Searl, J. (2007). Listeners' perceptions of the personality of male, alaryngeal speakers. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 32, 53–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evitts, P., Searl, J., Goberman, A. (2003 June). Long-term average spectral analysis (LTAS) of tracheoesophageal speech. The Voice Foundation's Annual Symposium, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, M., McGlone, E. (1976). Social response to acoustic and visual characteristics of oral cleft. Cleft Palate Journal, 13, 181–183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilmore, S. (1974). Social and vocational acceptability of esophageal speakers compared to normal speakers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 17, 599–607.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green, G., Hults, M. (1982). Preferences for three types of alaryngeal speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 141–145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartman, D., Scott, D. (1974). Overt responses of listeners to alaryngeal speech. The Laryngoscope, 84, 410–416.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hassanein, R. (1995). Research methodology and statistical application. Kansas City, KS: University of Kansas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honjo, I., Isshiki, N. (1980). Laryngoscopic and voice characteristics of aged persons. Archives of Otolaryngology, 106, 149–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huck, S. W. (2000). Reading statistics and research (3rd ed). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hustad, K. Gearhart, K. (2004). Listener perceptions toward individuals with cerebral palsy who use speech supplementation strategies. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 168–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustad, K., Cahill, M. (2003). Effects of presentation mode and familiarization on intelligibility of dysarthric speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 198–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman, M. (1955). An experimental study of artificial-larynx and esophageal speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 20, 291–299.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kent, R. (1996). Hearing and believing: Some limits to the auditory-perceptual assessment of speech and voice disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5, 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Lass, N., Ruscello, D., Lakawicz, J. (1988). Listeners' perceptions of nonspeech characteristics of normal and dysarthric children. Journal of Communication Disorders, 21, 385–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lass, N., Ruscello, D., Pannabacker, M., Schmitt, J., Middleton, G., Schweppenheiser, K. (1995). The perceptions of stutterers by people who stutter. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 47, 247–251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKinnon, S. L., Hess, C. W., Landry, R. G. (1986). Reactions of college students to speech disorders. Journal of Communication Disorders, 19, 75–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertler, C. A., Vannatta, R. A. (2002). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods (2nd ed). Los Angeles, CA: Pyrczak.
   Google Scholar
• Most, T., Tobin, Y., Mimran, R. C. (2000). Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech production. Journal of Communication Disorders, 33, 165–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methodsThousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mowrer, D. E., Wahl, P., Doolan, S. (1978). Effects of lisping on audience evaluation of male speakers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 43, 140–148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsson, M., Soli, D., Sullivan, J. (1994). Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. Journal of the American Acoustical Society of America, 95, 1085–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panico, J., Healey, E., Brouwer, K., Susca, M. (2005). Listener perceptions of stuttering across two presentation modes: A quantitative and qualitative approach. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 30, 65–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pindzola, R. H., Cain, B. H. (1988). Acceptability of ratings of tracheoesophageal speech. Laryngoscope, 98, 394–397.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robbins, J., Fisher, H. B., Blom, E. C., Singer, M. I. (1984). A comparative study of normal, esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech production. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 202–210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sander, E. K. (1965). Comments on investigating listener reaction to speech disfluency. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 30, 159–165.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snidecor, J., Curry, E. (1959). Temporal and pitch aspects of superior esophageal speech. Annals of Otolaryngology, 68, 623–636.
   Google Scholar
• Susca, M., Healey, E. C. (2001). Perceptions of simulated stuttering and fluency. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 61–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S., Watson, J. (1987). Speaking proficiency variations according to method of alaryngeal voicing. Laryngoscope, 97, 737–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar