663
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

“You feel like family …” Professional boundaries and social model aphasia groups

&
Pages 152-161 | Published online: 21 Jan 2010

References

  • American Nurses Association, I. (2005). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 4 June 2009 from http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/EthicsStandards/CodeofEthics.aspx
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2003). Code of ethics [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 13 June 2009 from http://www.asha.org/policy
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2004). Conflicts of professional interests. [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 5 June 2009 from http://www.asha.org/policy
  • Austin, W., Bergum, V., Nuttgens, S., Peternelj-Taylor, C. (2006). A re-visioning of boundaries in professional helping relationships: Exploring other metaphors. Ethics and Behavior, 16, 77–94.
  • Australian Nursing & Midwifery Council. (2008). Code of ethics for nurses in Australia [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 17 June 2009 from http://www.anmc.org.au
  • Body, R., McAllister, L. (2009). Ethics in speech and language therapy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Buetow, S., Jutel, A., Hoare, K. (2009). Shrinking social space in the doctor-modern patient relationship: A review of forces for, and implications of, homologisation. Patient Education and Counseling, 74, 97–103.
  • Byng, S., Duchan, J. (2005). Social model philosophies and principles: Their applications to therapies for aphasia. Aphasiology, 19, 906–922.
  • Chapey, R., Duchan, J. F., Elman, R. J., Garcia, L. J., Kagan, A., Lyon, J., et al (2001). Life participation approach to aphasia: A statement of values for the future. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (4th ed., pp. 235–245). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins.
  • College of Audiologists and Speech-Language Pathologists of Ontario. (2004). The importance of maintaining professional relationships and boundaries. CASPLO Today, (1), 21–23.
  • Cruice, M. (2008). The contribution and impact of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health on quality of life in communication disorders. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 38–49.
  • Cummins, R. A., Lau, A. L. D. (2005). Empowerment versus quality of life: A perspective based on subjective wellbeing homeostasis. In P. O'Brien, M. Sullivan (Eds.), Allies in emancipation: Shifting from providing service to being of support ( pp. 78–90). Melbourne: Thomson.
  • Curtis, L. C., Hodge, M. (1994). Old standards, new dilemmas: Ethics and boundaries in community support services. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 18(2), 13–33.
  • Davidson, J. C. (2005). Professional relationship boundaries: A social work teaching module. Social Work Education, 24, 511–533.
  • Elman, R. J. (2004). Group treatment and jazz: Some lessons learned. In J. Duchan, S. Byng (Eds.), Challenging aphasia therapies: Broadening the discourse and extending the boundaries. Hove: Psychology Press.
  • Elman, R. J. (2007). The importance of aphasia group treatment for rebuilding community and health. Topics in Language Disorders, 27, 300–308.
  • Elman, R. J., Bernstein-Ellis, E. (1999). Psychosocial aspects of group communication treatment. Seminars in Speech and Language, 20, 65–72.
  • Entwistle, V. A., Watt, I. S. (2006). Patient involvement in treatment decision-making: The case for a broader conceptual framework. Patient Education and Counseling, 63, 268–278.
  • Epstein, R. S. (1994). Keeping boundaries: Maintaining safety and integrity in the psychotherapeutic process. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
  • Ewing, S. E. A. (2007). Group process, group dynamics, and group techniques with neurogenic communication disorders. In R. J. Elman (Ed.), Group treatment of neurogenic communication disorders: The expert clinician's approach (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Fine, M., Teram, E. (2009). Believers and skeptics: Where social workers situate themselves regarding the code of ethics. Ethics and Behaviour, 19, 60–78.
  • Fisher, M. (1990). The shared experience and self-disclosure. In G. Stricker, M. Fisher (Eds.), Self-disclosure in the therapeutic relationship. ( pp. 3–15). New York: Plenum.
  • Fourie, R. J. (2009). Qualitative study of the therapeutic relationship in speech and language therapy: Perspectives of adults with acquired communication and swallowing disorders. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44, 979–999.
  • Frank, A. W. (2002). The painter and the cameraman: Boundaries in clinical relationships. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 23, 219–232.
  • Frank, A. W. (2004). Ethics as process and practice. Internal Medicine Journal, 34, 355–357.
  • Fronek, P., Kendall, M., Ungerer, G., Malt, J., Eugarde, E., Geraghty, T. (2009a). Too hot to handle: Reflections on professional boundaries in practice. Reflective Practice, 10, 161–171.
  • Fronek, P., Kendall, M., Ungerer, G., Malt, J., Eugarde, E., Geraghty, T. (2009b). Towards healthy professional-client relationships: The value of an interprofessional training course. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 23, 16–29.
  • Grodin, M. A. (2008). The porous border of boundaries. Ethics and Behavior, 18, 393–396.
  • Hermansson, G. (1997). Boundaries and boundary management in counselling: The never-ending story. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 25, 133–146.
  • Hersh, D. (2009). How do people with aphasia view their discharge from therapy? Aphasiology, 23, 331–350.
  • Hersh, D. (in press). Aphasia therapists' stories of ending the therapeutic relationship. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation.
  • Holder, K. V., Schenthal, S. J. (2007). Watch your step: Nursing and professional boundaries. Nursing Management, 38, 24–29.
  • Jones, M., O'Neill, P., Waterman, H., Webb, C. (1997). Building a relationship: communications and relationships between staff and stroke patients on a rehabilitation ward. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 101–110.
  • Jordan, L., Bryan, K. (2001). Seeing the person? Disability theories and speech and language therapy. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 36, 453–458.
  • Kagan, A. (1998). Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: Methods and resources for training conversation partners. Aphasiology, 12, 816–830.
  • Kagan, A., Cohen-Schneider, R., Sherman, C., Podolsky, L. (2007). Groups in the Aphasia Institute's Introductory Program: Preparing to live successfully with aphasia. In R. J. Elman (Ed.), Group treatment of neurogenic communication disorders: The expert clinician's approach (2nd ed., pp. 211–232). San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
  • Kearns, K. P., Elman, R. J. (2001). Group therapy for aphasia: Theoretical and practical considerations. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. ( pp. 316–337). Baltimore, MA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • Kenny, B. J., Lincoln, M., Blyth, K., Balandin, S. (2009). Ethical perspective on quality of care: The nature of ethical dilemmas identified by new graduate and experienced speech pathologists. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44, 421–439.
  • Knapp, S., Slattery, J. M. (2004). Professional boundaries in nontraditional settings. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 553–558.
  • Korchin, S. (1976). Modern clinical psychology. New York: Basic Books.
  • Lazarus, A. A. (1994). How certain boundaries and ethics diminish therapeutic effectiveness. Ethics & Behavior, 4, 255–261.
  • Leplege, A., Gzil, F., Cammelli, M., Lefeve, C., Pachoud, B., Ville, I. (2007). Person-centredness: Conceptual and historical perspectives. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29, 1555–1565.
  • Macleod, R., McPherson, K. M. (2007). Care and compassion: Part of person-centred rehabilitation, inappropriate response or a forgotten art? Disability and Rehabilitation, 29, 1589–1595.
  • Martinez, R. (2002). Professionalism and boundaries. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 23, 185–189.
  • Moleski, S. M., Kiselica, M. S. (2005). Dual relationships: A continuum ranging from the destructive to the therapeutic. Journal of Counseling and Development, 83, 3–11.
  • National Council of State Boards of Nursing. (1997). Crossing the line: When professional boundaries are violated. Elicott City, MD: Integrated Management and Publishing Systems.
  • O'Halloran, R., Larkins, B. (2008). The ICF Activities and Participation related to speech-language pathology. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 18–26.
  • O'Halloran, R., Hersh, D., Laplante-Levesque, A., Worrall, L. (in press). Person-centredness, ethics and stories of risk. Seminars in Speech and Language.
  • Parsons, R. D. (2001). The ethics of professional practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Peternelj-Taylor, C. (2002). Professional boundaries: A matter of therapeutic integrity. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing & Mental Health Services, 40(4), 22–29.
  • Peternelj-Taylor, C., Yonge, O. (2003). Exploring boundaries in the nurse-client relationship: Professional roles and responsibilities. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 39(2), 55–66.
  • Pound, C., Parr, S., Lindsay, J., Woolf, C. (2000). Beyond aphasia: Therapies for living with communication disability. Bicester: Speechmark Publishing.
  • Pugh, R. (2007). Dual relationships: Personal and professional boundaries in rural social work. British Journal of Social Work, 37, 1405–1423.
  • Reynolds, F. (2004). Enabling relationships in group contexts. In J. Swain, J. Clark, S. French, K. Parry, F. Reynolds (Eds.), Enabling relationships in health and social care: A guide for therapists. ( pp. 131–149). Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
  • Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists. (2006). Communicating Quality 3: RCSLT's guidance on best practice in service organisation and provision [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 15 June 2009 from http://www.rcslt.org
  • Shadden, B. B. (2007). Rebuilding identity through stroke support groups: Embracing the person with aphasia and significant others. In R. J. Elman (Ed.), Group treatment of neurogenic communication disorders: The expert clinician's approach (2nd ed., pp. 111–126). San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
  • Sheets, V. R. (2000). Staying in the lines. Nursing Management, 31(8), 28–33.
  • Simmons-Mackie, N. (2000). Social approaches to the management of aphasia. In L. Worrall, C. Frattali (Eds.), Neurogenic communication disorders: A functional approach. ( pp. 137–161). New York: Thieme.
  • Simmons-Mackie, N. (2001a). Social approaches in clinical practice: Examining clinical assumptions. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 3, 47–50.
  • Simmons-Mackie, N. (2001b). Social approaches to aphasia intervention. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • Sommers-Flanagan, R., Elliott, D., Sommers-Flanagan, J. (1998). Exploring the edges: Boundaries and breaks. Ethics and Behavior, 8, 37–48.
  • Speech Pathology Association of Australia. (2000). Code of Ethics [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 16 June 2009 from http://www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au/
  • Togher, L. (2003). Do I have green hair? “Conversations” in the clinic. In S. Parr, J. F. Duchan, C. Pound (Eds.), Aphasia inside out: Reflections on communication disability ( pp. 65–79). London: Open University Press.
  • van der Gaag, A., Smith, L., Davis, S., Moss, B., Cornelius, V., Laing, S., et al (2005). Therapy and support services for people with long-term stroke and aphasia and their relatives: A six-month follow-up study. Clinical Rehabilitation, 19, 372–380.
  • Vinogradov, S., Yalom, I. (1990). Self-disclosure in group psychotherapy. In G. Stricker, M. Fisher (Eds.), Self-disclosure in the therapeutic relationship. ( pp. 191–204). New York: Plenum.
  • Williams, M. H. (1997). Boundary violations: Do some contended standards of care fail to encompass commonplace procedures of humanistic, behavioural and eclectic psychotherapies? Psychotherapy, 34, 239–249.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.