Recovery of speech following total glossectomy: An acoustic and perceptual appraisal

References

• Abbs, J. H., Graco, V. L., & Cole, K. J. (1984). Control of multimovement coordination: Sensorimotor mechanism in speech motor programming. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 195–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, N. T., & Schultz, G. S. (1993). Growth factors and wound healing: Part II. Role in normal and chronic wound healing. American Journal of Surgery, 166, 74–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2002). Praat software (version 4.1.21) [computer software]. Available online at: www.praat.org, accessed October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Borden, G. J., Harris, K. S., & Raphael, L. J. (1994). Speech science primer: Physiology, acoustics, and perception of speech (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: William & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Bressmann, T., Jacobs, H., Quintero, J., & Irish, J. C. (2009). Speech outcomes for partial glossectomy surgery: Measures of speech articulation and listener perception. Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 3, 204–210.
   Google Scholar
• Bressmann, T., Sader, R., Whitehill, T. L., & Samman, N. (2004). Consonant intelligibility and tongue motility in patients with partial glossectomy. Journal of Oral andMaxillofacial Surgery, 62, 298–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruijn, M. J., Bosch, T. L., Juik, D. J., Quene, H., Langendijk, J. A., Leemans, C. R., . (2009). Objective acoustic-phonetic speech analysis in patients treated for oral or oropharyngeal cancer. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 61, 180–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupont, W., & Plummer, W. (1990). Power and sample size calculations: A review and computer program. Controlled Clinical Trials, 11, 116–128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Furia, C. L. B., Kowalski, L. P., Latorre, M. R. D. O., Angelis, E. C., Martins, N. M. S., Barros, A. P. B., . (2001). Speech Intelligibility after glossectomy and speech rehabilitation. Archives of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 127, 877–883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgian, D. A., Logemann, J. A., & Fisher, H. B. (1982). Compensatory articulation patterns of a surgically treated oral cancer patient. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 154–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guenther, F. H. (1994). A neural network model of speech acquisition and motor equivalent speech production. Biological Cybernetics, 72, 43–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, F. H., & Vladusich, T. (in press). A neural theory of speech acquisition and production. Journal of Neurolinguistics
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyen, D. T., Orgill D. P., & Murphy G. F. (2009). The pathophysiologic basis for wound healing and cutaneous regeneration. In D. P. Orgill, & C. Blanco (Eds.), Biomaterials for treating skin loss (pp. 25–57). Boston, MA: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organisation of behaviour. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Honda, K. (1996). Organization of tongue articulation for vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, O. M., & Abbs, J. H. (1976). Labial-mandibular coordination in the production of speech: Implications for the operation of motor equivalence. Phonetica, 33, 199–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, S., & Michi, K. (1992). Articulatory function after resection of the tongue and floor of the mouth: Palatometric and perceptual evaluation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 68–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kane, D. (2001). Chronic wound healing and chronic wound management. In D. Krasner, G. T. Rodeheaver, R. G. Sibbald (Eds.), Chronic wound care: A Clinical source book for healthcare professionals (3rd ed.) (pp. 7–17). Wayne, PA: Health Management Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kazi, R., Prasad, V. M. N., Kanagalingam, J., Georgalas, C., Venkitaraman, R., Nutting, C. M., . (2007). Analysis of formant frequencies in patients with oral or oropharyngeal cancers treated by glossectomy. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 42, 521–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerstein, M. D. (1997). The scientific basis of healing. Advances in Skin and Wound Care, 10, 30–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kimata, Y., Sakuraba, M., Hishinuma, S., Ebihara, S., Hayashi, R., Asakage, T., . (2003). Analysis of the relations between the shape of the reconstructed tongue and postoperative functions after subtotal or total glossectomy. Laryngoscope, 113, 905–909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knuuttila, H., Pukander, J., Maatta, T., Pakarinen, L., & Vilkman, E. (1999). Speech articulation after subtotal glossectomy and reconstruction with a myocutaneous flap. Acta Otolarynogologica, 119, 621–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, L. P., Carvalho, A. L., & Magrin, J. (2000). Cirurgia reparadora em câncer de cabeça e pescoço. In E.Carrara-De Angelis, C. L. B. Furia, L. F. Mourão, & L. P. Kowalski (Eds.), A Atuação Fonoaudiológica em Câncer de Cabeça e Pescoço (pp. 127–134). São Paulo, Brazil: Lovise.
   Google Scholar
• Ladefoged, P. (2005). Vowels and consonants (2nd ed). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, A. B., & Kolhe, P. S. (1987). The posterior auricular flap intra-oral reconstruction. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 40, 570–581.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leonard, R., & Gillis, R. (1982). Effects of prosthetic tongue on vowel intelligibility and food management in a patient with total glossectomy. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 25–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leonard, R., Goodrich, S., McMenamin, P., & Donald, P. (1992). Differentiation of speakers with glossectomies by acoustic and perceptual measures. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 1, 56–63.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, B. (1963). Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35, 1173–1181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, B., Brownlee, S., Davis, B., & Moon, S-J. (1992). Speech transforms. Speech Communication, 11, 357–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logemann, J. A., Pauloski, B. R., Rademaker, A. W., McConnel, F. M. S., Hesier, M. A., Cardinale, S., . (1993). Speech and swallow function after tonsil/base of tongue resection with primary closure. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 918–926.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Louie, M. J., Duncan, G. M., & Glasson, D.W. (1984). The ulnar artery forearm free flap. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 37, 438–492.
   Google Scholar
• MacNeilage, P. F. (1970). Motor control of serial ordering of speech. Psychological Review, 77, 182–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsui, Y., Shirota, T., Yamashita, Y., & Ohno, K. (2009). Analyses of speech intelligibility in patients after glossectomy and reconstruction with fasciocutaneous/myocutaneous flaps. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 38, 339–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinstry, R. E., Aramany, M. A., Beery, Q. C., & Sansone, F. (1985). Speech considerations in prosthodontic rehabilitation of the glossectomy patient. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 53, 384–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrish, L. (1984). Compensatory vowel articulation of the glossectomee: acoustic and videofluoroscopic evidence. British Journal of Communication, 19, 125–134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oviatt, S., Levow, G. A., Moreton, E., & MacEachern, M. (1998). Modeling global and focal hyperarticulation during human–computer error resolution. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 3080–3098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauloski, B. R., Logemann, J. A., Rademaker, A. W., McConnel, F. M. S., Hesier, M. A., Cardinale, S., . (1993). Speech and swallow function after anterior tongue and floor of mouth resection with distal flap reconstruction. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 267–276.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peled, Z. M., Chin, G. S., Liu, W., Galliano, R. D., & Longaker, M. T. (2000). Response to tissue injury. Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 27, 489–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkell, J. S., Matthies, M. L., Svirsky, M. A., & Jordan, M. I. (1993). Trading relations between tongue-body raising and lip rounding in production of the vowel /I/: A pilot motor equivalence study. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 93, 2948–2961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastadmehr, O., Bressmann, T., Smyth, R., & Irish, J. C. (2008). Increased tongue velocity indicates articulatory compensation in speakers with partial glossectomies. Head & Neck, 30, 718–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robb, M., & Chen, Y. (2008). Vowel space in Mandarin accented English. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing, 11, 175–188.
   Google Scholar
• Sakuraba, M., Asano, T., Miyamoto, S., Hayashi, M., Yamazaki, M., Miyazaki, M., Ugumori, T., Daiko, H., & Kimata, Y. (2009). A new flap for tongue reconstruction after total or subtotal glossectomy in thin patients. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, 62, 795–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. L., & Muse, A. M. (1987). An investigation of motor equivalence in the speech of children and adults. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 82, 837–842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teichgraeber, J., Bowman, J., & Goepert, H. (1986). Functional analysis of treatment of oral cavity cancer. Archives of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 112, 959–965.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terai, H., & Shimahara, M. (2004). Evaluation of speech intelligibility after a secondary dehiscence operation using an artificial graft in patients with speech disorders after partial glossectomy. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 42, 190–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, G., Tjaden, K., & Weismer, G. (1995). The influence of speaking rate on vowel space and vowel intelligibility for individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing, 38, 1001–1013.
   Google Scholar
• Wakumoto, M., Ohno, K., Imai, S., Yamashita, Y., Akizuki, H., & Michi, K. I. (1996). Analysis of the articulation after glossectomy. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 23, 764–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehill, T. L., Ciocca, V., Chan, J. C., & Samman, N. (2006). Acoustic analysis of vowels following glossectomy. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 20, 135–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, R. K., Poon, E. S., Woo, C. Y., Chan, S. C., Wong, E. S., & Chu, A. W. (2007). Speech outcomes in Cantonese patients after glossectomy. Head and Neck, 29, 758–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, I. S., Lee, D. W., Lee, W. J., Lew, D. H., Choi, E. C., & Rah, D. K. (2010). Correlation of neotongue volume changes with functional outcomes after long-term follow-up of total glossectomy. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 21, 111–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar