Studying the impact of intensity is important but complicated

References

• Al Otaiba S., Schatschneider C., & Silverman E. (2005). Tutor-assisted intensive learning strategies in kindergarten: How much is enough? Exceptionality, 13, 195–208.
   Google Scholar
• Baker E. (2012). Optimal intervention intensity. International Journal of Speech-language Pathology, 14, 401–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett J., Littlejohns P., & Thompson J. (1992). Trial of intensive compared with weekly speech therapy in preschool children. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 67, 106–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton C. A., Cirino P. T., Barth A. E., Romain M., Vaughn S., & Wexler J. (2011). An experimental study of scheduling and duration of “tier 2” first-grade reading intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4, 208–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edeal D. M., & Gildersleeve-Neumann C. E. (2011). The importance of production frequency in therapy for childhood apraxia of speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 95–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanselow M., & Tighe T. (1988). Contextual conditioning with massed versus distributed unconditional stimuli in the absence of explicit conditional stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 187–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fey M. E., Yoder P., Warren S. F., & Bredin-Oja S. (2012). Is more better? Milieu Communication Teaching in toddlers with intellectual disabilities. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Gottesman I. I. (1963). Genetic Aspects of Intelligent Behavior. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency (pp. 253–296). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gray S. (2003). Word-learning by preschoolers with specific language impairment: What predicts success? Journal of Speech, Language, Hearing Research, 46, 56–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell D. C. (2009). Statistical methods for psychology. Florence, KY: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard L. B. (1994). Some problems facing accounts of morphological deficits in children with specific language impairments. In S. F. Warren, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Specific language impairments in children (vol. 4) (pp. 91–105). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Maas E., & Farinella K. A. (2011). Random versus blocked practice in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, Hearing Research, Advance online publication. pp. 561–578.
   Google Scholar
• McDuffie A., Lieberman R., & Yoder P. 2012. Object interest in young children with autism spectrum disorders: A randomized treatment comparison. Autism
   Google Scholar
• Oetting J. B., Rice M. L., & Swank L. K. (1995). Quick Incidental Learning (QUIL) of words by school-age children with and without SLI. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 434–445.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rice M. L., Oetting J. B., Marquis J., Bode J., & Pae S. (1994). Frequency of input effects on word comprehension of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 106–122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riches N. G., Tomasello M., & Conti-Ramsden G. (2005). Verb learning in children with SLI: Frequency and spacing effects. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1397–1411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ukrainetz T. A., Ross C. L., & Harm H. M. (2009). An investigation of treatment scheduling for phonemic awareness of kindergartners who are at risk for reading disabilities. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 40, 86–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren S., Fey M. E., & Yoder P. J. (2007). Differential treatment intensity research: A missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 70–77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yin H., Barnet R., & Miller R. (1994). Trial spacing and trial distribution effects in Pavlovian conditioning: Contributions of a comparator mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 123–134.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder P., Fey M., Warren S., & Woynaroski T. G. (2012). Dose frequency, Down syndrome, and vocabulary. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar