Invariant principles of speech motor control that are not language-specific

References

• Ackermann, H., Hertrich, I., & Scharf, G. (1995). Kinematic analysis of lower lip movements in ataxic dysarthria. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1252–1259.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adams, S. G., Weismer, G., & Kent, R. D. (1993). Speaking rate and speech movement velocity profiles. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 41–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aiello, L. C. (1996). Terrestriality, bipedalism and the origin of language. In J. Maynard-Smith (Ed.), Evolution of social behaviour patterns in primates and man. London: Proceedings of the British Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Androutsos, G., & Diamantis, A. (2007). Paul Broca (1824 - 1880): Founder of anthropology, pioneer of neurology and oncology. Journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology, 12, 557–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, S. W., & Farley, G. R. (1989). Neurophysiology of speech. In D. P. Kuehn, M. L. Lemme, & J. M. Baumgartner (Eds.), Neural bases of speech, hearing and language (pp. 146–200). Boston: College-Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49, 155–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, R., Goffman, L., & Smith, A. (2008). Physiological indices of bilingualism: Speech movement coordination in Bengali-English speakers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 321–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, R., & Shanmugam, R. (2011). Influence of L2 proficiency on kinematic duration of single words: Real and novel word production by Bengali-English speakers. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flege, J. E. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Findings and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 233–273). Timonium, MD: York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flege, J., Frieda, E., & Nowaza, T. (1997). Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 169–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, C. A., & Turvey, M. T. (1978). Skill acquisition: An event approach for the optimum of a function of several variables. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 2–40). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, L. (1999). Prosodic influences on speech production in children with specific language impairment and speech deficits: Kinematic, acoustic, and transcription evidence. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1499–1517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, L. (2004). Kinematic differentiation of prosodic categories in normal and disordered language development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1088–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, L., & Malin, C. (1999). Metrical effects on speech movements in children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1003–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, F. H., Espy-Wilson, C. Y., Boyce, S. E., Matthies, M. L., Zandipour, M., & Perkell, J. S. (1999). Articulatory tradeoffs reduce acoustic variability during American English /r/ production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 2854–2865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, F. H., Hampson, M., & Johnson, D. (1998). A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements. Psychological Review, 105, 611–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammill, D. D., Brown, V. L., Larsen, S. C., & Weiderholt, J. L. (1994). Test of Adolescent and Adult Language Third Edition. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569–1579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinow, J., & Smith, A. (2000). Kinematic correlates of speaking rate changes in stuttering and normally fluent adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 521–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laitman, J. T. (1984). The anatomy of human speech. Natural History, 93, 20–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laitman, J. T., & Reidenberg, J. S. (2009). The evolution of the human larynx: Nature's great experiment. In M. P. Fried, & A. Ferlito (Eds.), The larynx (pp.19–38). San Diego, CA: Plural.
   Google Scholar
• Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., & Wheeldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay, I., & Flege, J. (2004). Effects of the age of second language learning on the duration of the first and second language sentences: The role of suppression. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 373–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathworks, Inc. (1994). Matlab: Higher Performance numeric computation and visualization software [computer program]. Natick, MA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, D., Baum, S. R., & Chabot, C. (1996). Speech compensation to structural modifications of the oral cavity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 1093–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neville, H. J., Mills, D. L., & Lawson, D. S. (1992). Fractionating language: Different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. Cerebral Cortex, 2, 244–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostry, D. J., Cooke, J. D., & Munhall, K. G. (1987). Velocity curves of human arms and speech movements. Experimental Brain Research, 68, 37–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penfield, W., & Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and brain mechanisms. New York: Atheneum.
   Google Scholar
• Perkell, J. S., Matthies, M. L., Svirsky, M. A., & Jordan, M. I. (1993). Trading relations between tongue-body raising and lip rounding in production of the vowel /u/: A pilot “motor equivalence” study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 2948–2961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrier, P. (2006). About speech motor control complexity. In J. Harrington, & M. Tabain (Eds.), Speech production: Models, phonetic processes, and techniques (pp. 13–26). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadagopan, N., & Smith, A. (2004). Influence of utterance length and complexity on trajectory stability and phrase durations: Age related changes. Poster presented at the Conference on Motor Speech: Motor Speech Disorders and Speech Motor Control. Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Saltzman, E. (1978). Levels of sensorimotor representation. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 20, 91–163.
   Google Scholar
• Savariaux, C., Perrier, P., Orliaguet, J. P., & Schwartz J. L. (1999). Compensation strategies for the perturbation of French [u] using a lip tube. II. Perceptual analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 381–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scovel, T. (1988). A time to speak: A psycholinguistic inquiry into the critical period for human speech. New York: Newbury House/Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Goffman, L. (1998). Stability and patterning of speech movement sequences in children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41 18–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Goffman, L. (2004). Interaction of motor and language factors in the development of speech production. In B. Maassen, R. Kent, & H. Peters (Eds.), Speech motor control in normal and disordered speech (pp. 225–252). Oxford University Press: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Goffman, L., Zelaznik, H., Ying, G., & McGillem, C. (1995). Spatiotemporal stability and pattering of speech movement sequences. Experimental Brain Research, 104, 493–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Johnson, M., McGillem, C., & Goffman, L. (2000). On the assessment of stability and patterning of speech movements. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 277–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Zelaznik, H. (2004). The development of functional synergies for speech motor coordination in childhood and adolescence. Developmental Psychobiology, 45, 22–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares, C., & Grosjean, F. (1984). Bilinguals in a monolingual and bilingual speech mode: The effect on lexical access. Memory and Cognition, 12, 380–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporns, O., & Edelman, G. M. (1993). Solving Bernstein's problem: A proposal for the development of coordinated movement by selection. Child Development, 64, 960–981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, E., & Smith, L. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Indiana: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, B., & Smith, A. (2002). Articulatory movements in adolescents: Evidence for protracted development of speech motor control processes. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 1119–1133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber-Fox, C., & Neville, H. (1996). Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 231–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber-Fox, C., & Neville, H. (2001). Sensitive periods differentiate processing of open- and closed-class words: An ERP study of bilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 1138–1353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, G. N. (1980). Articulatory dynamics of fluent utterances of stutterers and nonstutterers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23, 95–107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar