Effects of practice schedules on speech motor learning

References

• Adams, S. G., & Page, A. D. (2000). Effects of selected practice and feedback variables on speech motor learning. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 215–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, S. G., Page, A. D., & Jog, M. (2002). Summary feedback schedules and speech motor learning in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 215–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, K. J., Robin, D. A., McCabe, P., & McDonald, J. (2010). A treatment for dysprosody in childhood apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1227–1245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2008). Praat (Version 5.1). Amsterdam. http://www.praat.org.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, B. A., Coker, C. A., & Bunker, L. K. (2006). Implications for variability of practice from pedagogy and motor learning perspectives: Finding common ground. Quest, 58, 330–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, F. (1998). A theoretical and empirical review of the contextual interference effect and the learning of motor skills. Quest, 50, 266–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, F. (2008). The contextual interference effect and sport skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106, 461–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a non-search task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, 35, 116–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423, 534–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 212–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert, E. P., Landin, D., & Solmon, M. A. (1996). Practice schedule effects on the performance and learning of low- and high-skilled students: An applied study. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 52–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Knock, T. R., Ballard, K. J., Robin, D. A., & Schmidt, R. A. (2000). Influence of order of stimulus presentation on speech motor learning: A principled approach to treatment for apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 14, 653–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehn, J. D., Dickinson, J., & Goodman, D. (2008). Cognitive demands of error processing. Psychological Reports, 102, 532–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landin, D., & Hebert, E. P. (1997). A comparison of three practice schedules along the contextual interference continuum. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 357–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 339–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1983). The locus of contextual interference in motor-skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 730–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D., & Simon, D. A. (2004). Contextual interference. In A. M. Williams, & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 29–44). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D., Magill, R. A., & Weeks, D. J. (1985). Influence of practice schedule on testing schema theory predictions in adults. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 283–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & Wright, D. L. (2000). An assessment of the attention demands during random- and blocked-practice schedules. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 591–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, C., & Masters, R. S. W. (2001). Analogy learning: A means to implicit motor learning. Journal of Sports Sciences, 19, 307–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, E., & Farinella, K. A. (2012). Random versus blocked practice in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 561–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, E., Robin, D. A., Austermann Hula, S. N., Freedman, S. E., Wulf, G., Ballard, K. J., et al. (2008). Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 277–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMahon, K. M. A., & Masters, R. S. W. (2002). Implicit motor learning: A suppression solution? International Journal of Sports Psychology, 33, 307–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magill, R. A., & Hall, K. G. (1990). A review of the contextual interference effects in skill acquisition. Human Movement Science, 9, 241–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, R. S. W. (1992). Knowledge, knerves and know-how: The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 343–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, R. S. W., & Maxwell, J. P. (2008). The theory of reinvestment. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1, 160–183.
   Google Scholar
• Masters, R. S. W., & Poolton, J. M. (2012). Advances in implicit motor learning. In N. J. Hodges, & A. M. Williams (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (2nd ed.) (pp. 59–75). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. P., Masters, R. S. W., & Eves, F. F. (2003). The role of working memory in motor learning and performance. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 376–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. P., Masters, R. S. W., Kerr, E., & Weedon, E. (2001). The implicit benefit of learning without errors. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 54, 1049–1068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 1–55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Poolton, J. M., Masters, R. S. W., & Maxwell, J. P. (2005). The relationship between initial errorless learning conditions and subsequent performance. Human Movement Sciences, 24, 362–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poolton, J. M., Masters, R. S. W., & Maxwell, J. P. (2006). The influence of analogy learning on decision-making in table tennis: Evidence from behavioural data. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 677–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poolton, J. M., Masters, R. S. W., & Maxwell, J. P. (2007). Passing thoughts on the evolutionary stability of implicit motor behavior: Performance retention under physiological fatigue. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 456–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, J. M., & Magill, R. A. (2010). Systematically increasing contextual interference is beneficial for learning sport skills. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28, 1277–1285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rendell, M. A., Masters, R. S. W., & Farrow, D. (2009). The paradoxical role of cognitive effort in contextual interference and implicit motor learning. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 40, 636–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rendell, M. A., Masters, R. S. W., Farrow, D., & Morris, T. (2010). An implicit basis for the retention benefits of random practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 43, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 179–187.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, J. B., & Zimny, S. T. (1983). Context effects in memory and learning movement information. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of action (pp. 345–366). New York: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Sadagopan, N., Walsh, B., & Weber-Fox, C. (2010). Increasing phonological complexity reveals heightened instability in inter-articulatory coordination in adults who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 35, 1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse, A. C.-Y., Masters, R. S. W., Whitehill, T. L., & Ma, E. P.-M. (2012). The use of analogy in speech motor performance. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 84–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Merwe, A. (1997). A theoretical framework for the characterization of pathological speech sensorimotor control. In M. R. McNeil (Ed.), Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders (pp. 1–25). New York: Thieme Medical Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, A. Y.-H., Ma, E. P.-M., & Yiu, E. M.-L. (2011). Effects of practice variability on learning of relaxed phonation in vocally hyperfunctional speakers. Journal of Voice, 25, 103–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. L., & Shea, C. H. (2001). Manipulating generalized motor program difficulty during blocked and random practice does not affect parameter learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, 32–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar