Systematic review of communication partner training in aphasia: Methodological quality

References

• Beeson, P., & Robey, R. (2006). Evaluating single-subject treatment research: Lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychology Review, 16, 161–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevington, L. J. (1985). The effect of a structured education programme on relatives’ knowledge of communication with stroke patients. Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders, 13, 117–121.
   Google Scholar
• Bhogal, S. K., Teasell, R. W., Foley, N. C., & Speechley, M. R. (2005). The PEDro scale provides a more comprehensive measure of methodological quality than the Jadad scale in stroke rehabilitation literature. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 668–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boles, L. (1997). Conversation analysis as a dependent measure in communication therapy with four individuals with aphasia. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech Language and Hearing, 2, 43–61.
   Google Scholar
• Boles, L. (1998). Conversational discourse analysis as a method for evaluating progress in aphasia: a case report. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31, 261–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, R., & Ward, C. (2003). Evaluation of a training programme to facilitate conversation between people with aphasia and their partners. Aphasiology, 17, 687–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damico, J. S., Simmons-Mackie, N., Oelschlaeger, M., Elman, R., & Armstrong, E. (1999). Qualitative methods in aphasia research: Basic issues. Aphasiology, 13, 651–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper, B., Bowring, G., Thompson, C., Van Heyst, J., Conroy, P., & Thompson, J. (2007). Stress in caregivers of aphasic stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 21, 122–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edlund, W., Gronseth, G., So, Y., & Franklin, G. (2004). Clinical practice guideline process manual. St. Paul, MN: American Academy of Neurology. http://www.aan.com/globals/axon/assets/2535.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Elman, R. J. (2006). Evidence-based practice: What evidence is missing?. Aphasiology, 20, 103–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, L. E., Poulsen, S. B., Bawden, K. C., & Packard, D. (2004). Critical elements and outcomes of a residential family-based intervention for aphasia caregivers. Aphasiology, 18, 1177–1199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, R., Moseley, A., & Sherrington, C. (1998–1999). PEDro: A database of RCTs in physiotherapy. Health Information Management, 28, 186–188.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, E. M., Bourgeois, M. S., & Olswang, L. B. (2004). Effects of training volunteers to converse with nursing home residents with aphasia. Aphasiology, 18, 625–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinckley, J. J., & Packard, M. E. (2001). Family education seminars and social functioning of adults with chronic aphasia. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34, 241–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinckley, J. J., Packard, M. E. W., & Bardach, L. G. (1995). Alternative family education programming for adults with chronic aphasia. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 2, 53–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffmann, T., Bennett, S., & Del Mar, C. (2010). Evidence-based practice across the health professions. Chatswood: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, T., Holland, A., & Rewega, M. (2002). Conversational coaching: Treatment outcomes and future directions. Aphasiology, 16, 745–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howick, J., Chalmers, I., Glasziou, P., Greenhalgh, T., Heneghan, C., Liberati, A., et al. (2011). The 2011 Oxford CEBM levels of evidence (Introductory document). Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653.
   Google Scholar
• Kaderavek, J. N., & Justice, L. M. (2010). Fidelity: An essential component of evidence-based practice in speech-language pathology. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 369–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, A., Black, S. E., Duchan, F. J., Simmons-Mackie, N., & Square, P. (2001). Training volunteers as conversation partners using “Supported Conversation for Adults with Aphasia” (SCA): A controlled trial. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 624–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, M., Stewart, D., Letts, L., Pollock, N., Bosch, J., & Westmorland, M. (2012). Guidelines for critical review form: Qualitative studies. 1998 McMasters University. http://www-fhs.mcmaster.ca/rehab/ebp/pdf/qualguidelines.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Legg, C., Young, L., & Bryer, A. (2005). Training sixth-year medical students in obtaining case-history information from adults with aphasia. Aphasiology, 19, 559–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesser, R., & Algar, L. (1995). Towards combining the cognitive neuropsychological and the pragmatic in aphasia therapy. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 5, 67–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, J. G., Cariski, D., Keisler, L., Rosenbek, J., Levine, R., Kumpula, J., et al. (1997). Communication partners: Enhancing participation in life and communication for adults with aphasia in natural settings. Aphasiology, 11, 693–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, C. G., Sherrington, C., Herbert, R., Moseley, A., & Elkins, M. (2003). Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Physical Therapy, 83, 713–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001). The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet, 357, 1191–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley, A. M., Herbert, R. D., Sherrington, C., & Maher, C. G. (2002). Evidence for physiotherapy practice: A survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 48, 43–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Dissemination of Disability Research (NCDDR), Task Force on Systematic Review and Guidelines. (2008). When the best is the enemy of the good: The nature of research evidence used in systematic reviews and guidelines. Webcast. Austin, TX. National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research, U.S. Department of Education; PR# H133A060028. www.ncddr.org/webcasts/13/webcast_102808.doc.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, F., Varchevker, A., & Pring, T. (1996). Working with people with aphasia and their families: An exploration of the use of family therapy techniques. Aphasiology, 10, 767–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdices, M., Schultz, R., Tate, R. L., McDonald, S., Togher, L., Savage, S., et al. (2006). The evidence base of neuropsychological rehabilitation in acquired brain impairment: How good is the research?. Brain Impairment, 7, 119–132.
   Google Scholar
• Popay, J., Rogers, A., & Williams, G. (1998). Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qualitative Health Research, 8, 341–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound, C., Parr, S., & Duchan, J. (2001). Using partners’ autobiographical reports to develop, deliver, and evaluate services in aphasia. Aphasiology, 15, 477–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy, M., & Hindenlang, J. (2005). Educating and training caregivers of persons with aphasia. Aphasiology, 19, 377–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, H., & Marshall, J. (2003). Training volunteers as conversation partners for people with aphasia. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 38, 149–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, S., Hermoni, D., Van-Raalte, R., Dahan, R., & Borkan, J. (2007). Aggregation of qualitative studies–From theory to practice: Patient priorities and family medicine/general practice evaluations. Patient Education and Counseling, 65, 214–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, B., Paull, A., & Muller, D. J. (1987). An evaluation of a social support group for spouses of aphasic partners. Aphasiology, 1, 247–256.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett, D. L., Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R. B. (2000). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. Edinburgh: Churchill.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Wendt, O., & Sigafoos, J. (2007). Not all systematic reviews are created equal: Considerations for appraisal. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1, 138–150.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N. N., Kagan, A., Christie, C. O., Huijbregts, M., McEwen, S., & Willems, J. (2007). Communicative access and decision making for people with aphasia: Implementing sustainable healthcare systems change. Aphasiology, 21, 39–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., Kearns, K., & Potechin, G. (2005). Treatment of aphasia through family member training. Aphasiology, 19, 583–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., Raymer, A., Armstrong, E., Holland, A., & Cherney, L. R. (2010). Communication partner training in aphasia: A systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91, 1814–1837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorin-Peters, R. (2004). The evaluation of a learner-centred training programme for spouses of adults with chronic aphasia using qualitative case study methodology. Aphasiology, 18, 951–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, R., McDonald, S., Perdices, M., Togher, L., Schultz, R., & Savage, S. (2008). Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: Introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18, 385–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L., Schultz, R., Tate, R., McDonald, S., Perdices, M., Smith, K., et al. (2009). The methodological quality of aphasia research: An investigation using the PsychBITE evidence based practice database. Aphasiology, 23, 694–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahrborg, P., & Borenstein, P. (1989). Family therapy in families with an aphasic member. Aphasiology, 3, 93–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar