Initial evaluation of the Consent Support Tool: A structured procedure to facilitate the inclusion and engagement of people with aphasia in the informed consent process

References

• Bland, M. (2008). Measuring health and disease. Cohen's kappa. Percentage agreement: A misleading approach. York: University of York. http://www-users.york.ac.uk/˜mb55/msc/clinimet/week4/kappash2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brady Wagner, L. C. (2003). Clinical ethics in the context of language and cognitive impairment: Rights and protections. Seminars in Speech and Language, 24, 275–284.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braunack-Mayer, A., & Hersh, D. (2001). An ethical voice in the silence of aphasia: Judging understanding and consent in people with aphasia. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 12, 388–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, A., Worrall, L., & McKenna, K. (2005). The relationship between specific features of aphasia-friendly written material and comprehension of written material for people with aphasia: An exploratory study. Aphasiology, 19, 693–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carling-Rowland, A., & Wahl, J. (2010). The evaluation of capacity to make admission decisions: Is it a fair process for individuals with communication barriers?Medical Law International, 10, 171–190.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, E., Paterson, B. L., Scott-Findlay, S., Ehnfors, M., & Ehrenberg, A. (2007). Methodological issues in interviews involving people with communication impairments after acquired brain damage. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 1361–1371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connect. (2007). Including people with communication disability in stroke research and consultation: A guide for researchers and service providers. London: Connect Communication Disability Network.
   Google Scholar
• Dalemans, R., Wade, D. T., van den Heuvel, W. J. A., & de Witte, L. P. (2009). Facilitating the participation of people with aphasia in research: A description of strategies. Clinical Rehabilitation, 23, 948–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eames, S., McKenna, K., Worrall, L., & Read, S. (2003). The suitability of written education materials for stroke survivors and their carers. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 10, 70–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferguson, A., Duffield, G., & Worrall, L. (2010). Legal decision-making by people with aphasia: Critical incidents for speech pathologists. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 45, 244–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, A., & Kimelman, M. (1995). Informed consent in aphasia research: Myth or reality?Clinical Aphasiology, 23, 65–75.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, A. M., & Rose, M. L. (2007). Interviewing people with aphasia: Insights into method adjustments from a pilot study. Aphasiology, 21, 208–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of Public Sector Information. (2005). Mental Capacity Act 2005. London: OPSI.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, R., & Paterson, G. (2011). One size does not fit all: Obtaining informed consent from people with aphasia. Advances in Clinical Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, 11, 30–31.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, R., Enderby, P., Cooper, C., Latimer, N., Julious, S., Paterson, G., et al. (2012). Computer therapy compared with usual care for people with long-standing aphasia post-stroke: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Stroke, 43, 1904–1911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn, C., Frankel, T., Watermeyer, J., & Müller, M. (2009). Informed consent and aphasia: Evidence of pitfalls in the process. Aphasiology, 23, 3–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman, & A. Burgess (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data (pp. 173–194). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, T., Worrall, L., & McKenna, K. (2003). The effectiveness of aphasia-friendly principles for printed health education materials for people with aphasia following stroke. Aphasiology, 17, 947–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, T. A., Worrall, L. E., Hickson, L. M., & Hoffmann, T. C. (2011). Aphasia friendly written health information: Content and design characteristics. International Journal of Speech- Language Pathology, 13, 335–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, T. A., Worrall, L. E., Hickson, L. M., & Hoffmann, T. C. (2012). Guiding principles for printed education materials: Design preferences of people with aphasia. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 11–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, T. A. (2006). Ethical issues in research with patients who have experienced stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 13, 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, J., & Brady Wagner, L. C. (2006). Is informed consent a “yes or no” response? Enhancing the shared decision-making process for persons with aphasia. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 13, 42–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinburn, K., Porter, G., & Howard, D. (2005). The Comprehensive Aphasia Test. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Townend, E., Brady, M., & McLaughlan, K. (2007). Exclusion and inclusion criteria for people with aphasia in studies of depression after stroke: A systematic review and future recommendations. Neuroepidemiology, 29, 1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White-Bateman, S. R., Schumacher, H. C., Sacco, R. L., & Appelbaum, P. S. (2007). Consent for intravenous thrombolysis in acute stroke: Review and future directions. Archives of Neurology, 64, 785–792.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Worrall, L., Rose, T., Howe, T., Brennan, A., Egan, J., Oxenham, D., et al. (2005). Access to written information for people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 19, 923–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar