A systematic review of treatment intensity in speech disorders

References

• Adams, S. G., & Page, A. D. (2000). Effects of selected practice and feedback variables on speech motor learning. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 215–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, S. G., Page, A. D., & Jog, M. (2002). Summary feedback schedules and speech motor learning in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 215–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, M. (2013). Intervention Efficacy and intensity for children with speech sound disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 865–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2004). Evidence-based practice in communication disorders: An introduction [Technical report]. Retrieved July 30, 2015 from www.asha.org/policy
   Google Scholar
• Baker, E. (2012). Optimal intervention intensity. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 401–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, E., & McLeod, S. (2011). Evidence-based practice for children with speech sound disorders: Part 1 narrative review. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42(2), 102–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhogal, S. K., Teasell, R., & Speechley, M. (2003). Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery. Stroke, 34, 987–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bothe, A. K., & Richardson, J. D. (2011). Statistical, practical, clinical, and personal significance: Definitions and applications in speech-language pathology. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 233–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandel, J., & Loeb, D. F. (2011). Program intensity and service delivery models in the schools: SLP survey results. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42, 461–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromage, B. K., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). Quantitative and qualitative effects of repetition on learning from technical text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 271–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Damiano, A. (1996). The Sickness Impact Profile user’s manual and interpretation guide. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Dollaghan, C. (2007). The Handbook for Evidence-Based Practice in Communication Disorders. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Driskell, J. E., Willis, R. P., & Copper, C. (1992). Effect of overlearning on retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durlak, J. A. (2009). How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34(9), 917–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edeal, D., & Gildersleeve-Neumann, C. (2011). The Importance of production frequency in therapy for childhood apraxia of speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 95–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enderby, P. (2012). How much therapy is enough? The impossible question! International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 432–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, Z., & Thomas, J. (2006). Systematic reviews and their application to research in speech and language therapy: A response to T. R. Pring’s ‘Ask a silly question: Two decades of troublesome trials’ (2004). International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 41, 95–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, R., & Fristoe, M. (2000). The Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Grimme, B., Fuchs, S., Perrier, P., & Schöner, G. (2011). Limb versus speech motor control: a conceptual review. Motor Control, 15, 5–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Jüni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., … Sterne, J. A. (2011). The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 343, d5928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilomaki, I., Laukkanen, A. M., Leppanen, K., & Vilkman, E. (2008). Effects of voice training and vocal hygiene education on acoustic and perceptual parameters and self-reported vocal well-being in female teachers. Logopedics, Phoniatrics, and Vocology, 33, 83–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knock, T. R., Ballard, K. J., Robin, D. A., & Schmidt, R. A. (2000). Influence of order of stimulus presentation on speech motor learning: A principled approach to treatment for apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 14, 653–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latterman, C., Euler, H. A., & Neumann, K. (2008). A randomised control trial to investigate the impact of the Lidcombe Program on early stuttering in German-speaking preschoolers. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 33, 52–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., … Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, W-65–W-94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, E., & Farinella, K. A. (2012). Random versus blocked practice in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 561–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, E., Robin, D., Austermann Hula, S., Freedman, S., Wulf, G., Ballard, K., & Schmidt, R. (2008). Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 277–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, E., McCabe, P., & Ballard, K. J. (2012). The first randomised controlled trial for childhood apraxia of speech. Paper presented at the speech pathology Australia national conference, Hobart, Tasmania.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, E., Power, E., Togher, L., McCabe, P., Munro, N., & Smith, K. (2013). The reliability of methodological ratings for speechBITE using the PEDro‐P scale. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 48, 297–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namasivayam, A. K., Pukonen, M., Goshulak, D., Hard, J., Rudzicz, F., Rietveld, T., … Lieshout, P. (2015). Treatment intensity and childhood apraxia of speech. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 50, 529–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osberger, M. J., Robbins, A. M. J., Todd, S. L., & Riley, A. I. (1994). Speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants. Volta Review, 96, 169–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packman, A., & Onslow, M. (2012). Investigating optimal intervention intensity with the Lidcombe Program of early stuttering intervention. International Journal of Speech-language Pathology, 14, 467–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J. & Brown, L. (2009). The Improvement Rate Difference for Single Case Research. Exceptional Children, 75, 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakap, S. (2015). Effect sizes as result interpretation aids in single‐subject experimental research: description and application of four nonoverlap methods. British Journal of Special Education, 42, 11–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramig, L. O., Sapir, S., Fox, C., & Countryman, S. (2001). Changes in vocal loudness following intensive voice treatment (LSVT®) in individuals with Parkinson's disease: A comparison with untreated patients and normal age‐matched controls. Movement Disorders, 16, 79–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robey, R. R. (2004). A five-phase model for clinical-outcome research. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37(5), 401–411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, N. (2012). Optimal dose-response relationships in voice therapy. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 419–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. & Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Spielman, J., Ramig, L. O., Mahler, L., Halpern, A., & Gavin, W. J. (2007). Effects of an extended version of the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment on voice and speech in Parkinson's disease. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 95–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, R. L., Perdices, M., Rosenkoetter, U., Wakim, D., Godbee, K., Togher, L., & McDonald, S. (2013). Revision of a method quality rating scale for single-case experimental designs and n-of-1 trials: The 15-item Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 23, 619–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, D., McCabe, P., & Ballard, K. (2014). Rapid Syllable Transitions (ReST) treatment for Childhood Apraxia of Speech: The effect of lower dose frequency. Journal of Communication Disorders, 51, 29–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, R., & Kaipa, R. (2015). The use of non-speech oral-motor exercises among Indian speech-language pathologists: An online survey. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 62, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas-Stonell, N., Washington, K., Oddson, B., Robertson, B., & Rosenbaum, P. (2013). Measuring communicative participation using the FOCUS©: Focus on the Outcomes of Communication under Six. Child: Care, Health and Development, 39, 474–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titze, I. R. (2006). Voice training and therapy with a semi-occluded vocal tract: Rationale and scientific underpinnings. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 448–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L. (2012). Challenges inherent in optimizing speech-language pathology outcomes: It's not just about counting the hours. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 438–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wambaugh, J. L., Martinez, A. L., McNeil, M. R., & Rogers, M. (1999). Sound production treatment for apraxia of speech: Overgeneralisation and maintenance effects. Aphasiology, 9–11, 821–837.
   Google Scholar
• Wambaugh, J., Nessler, C., Cameron, R., & Mauszycki, S. (2013). Treatment for acquired apraxia of speech: Examination of treatment intensity and practice schedule. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22, 84–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, S., Fey, M., & Yoder, P. (2007). Differential treatment intensity research: A missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 70–77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilcox, K. M., & Morris, S. (1999). Children Speech intelligibility Measure. Orlando, FL: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A. L. (2006). A systemic perspective for assessment and intervention: A case study. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 245–256.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A. L. (2012). Intensity in phonological intervention: Is there a prescribed amount? International journal of speech-language pathology, 14, 456–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlert, A. B. (2004). Service delivery variables and outcomes of treatment for hypokinetic dysarthria in Parkinson disease. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 235–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar