Associations between self-perceived voice disorders in teachers, perceptual assessment by speech-language pathologists, and instrumental analysis

References

• Angelillo, M., Di Maio, G., Costa, G., Angelillo, N., & Barillari, U. (2009). Prevalence of occupational voice disorders in teachers. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, 50, 26–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Araújo, S., Grellet, M., Pereira, J., & Rosa, M. (2002). Normatização de medidas acústicas da voz normal. Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia, 68, 540–544.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, D. (2001). How can I deal with missing data in my study? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25, 464–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermudez de Alvear, R. (2003). Exploración clínica de los trastornos de la voz, el habla y la audición: Pautas y protocolos asistenciales (1st ed.). España: Ediciones Aljibe.
   Google Scholar
• Bhuta, T., Patrick, L., & Garnett, J. (2004). Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurements. Journal of Voice, 18, 299–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2009). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.05). Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Brockmann-Bauser, M., & Drinnan, M. J. (2011). Routine acoustic voice analysis: time to think again? Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 19, 165–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor Cutiva, L. C., & Burdorf, A. (2014). Factors associated with voice-related quality of life among teachers with voice complaints. Journal of Communication Disorders, 52, 134–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor Cutiva, L. C., & Burdorf, A. (2015a). Effects of noise and acoustics in schools on vocal health in teachers. Noise and Health, 17, 17–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor Cutiva, L. C., & Burdorf, A. (2015b). Medical Costs and Productivity Costs Related to Voice Symptoms in Colombian Teachers. Journal of Voice, 29, 776.e15–776.e22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor Cutiva, L. C., & Burdorf, A. (2015c). Objective parameters of voice in Colombian school workers with healthy voices. Revista Ciencias de la Salud, 13, 331–344.
   Google Scholar
• Cantor Cutiva, L. C., Vogel, I., & Burdorf, A. (2013). Voice disorders in teachers and their associations with work-related factors: A systematic review. Journal of Communication Disorders, 46, 143–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carding, P. (2000). Evaluating Voice Therapy: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Treatment. (1st ed.). London: Whurr Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Epi-info (Version 3.5.3). Retrieved from http://wwwn.cdc.gov/epiinfo/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Chiang, S., Chung, Y., Hsiao, L., & Hsiao, T. (2010). Risk factors and effects of voice problems for teachers. Journal of Voice, 24, 183–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bodt, M., Wuyts, F., Van de Heyning, P., & Croux, C. (1997). Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: Influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. Journal of Voice, 11, 74–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Medeiros, A., Barreto, S., & Assuncao, A. (2008). Voice disorders (dysphonia) in public school female teachers working in Belo Horizonte: prevalence and associated factors. Journal of Voice, 22, 676–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dejonckere, P., Obbens, C., de Moor, G., & Wieneke, G. (1993). Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: reliability and relevance. Folia Phoniatrica (Basel), 45, 76–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnegan, D. (1984). Maximum phonation time for children with normal voices. Journal of Communication Disorders, 17, 309–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakkesteegt, M., Brocaar, M., Wieringa, M., & Feenstra, L. (2008). The Relationship Between Perceptual Evaluation and Objective Multiparametric Evaluation of Dysphonia Severity. Journal of Voice, 22, 138–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heman-Ackah, Y. D., Michael, D. D., & Goding Jr, G. S. (2002). The relationship between cepstral peak prominence and selected parameters of dysphonia. Journal of Voice, 16, 20–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano, M. (1981). Psycho-acoustic evaluation of voice. In W. Arnold, Wyke, eds (Ed.), Disorders of Human Communication, Clinical Examination of Voice. New York and Wien: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ilomaki, I., Leppanen, K., Kleemola, L., Tyrmi, J., Laukkanen, A., & Vilkman, E. (2009). Relationships between self-evaluations of voice and working conditions, background factors, and phoniatric findings in female teachers. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 34, 20–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kankare, E., Geneid, A., Laukkanen, A., & Vilkman, E. (2012). Subjective Evaluation of Voice and Working Conditions and Phoniatric Examination in Kindergarten Teachers. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 64, 12–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnell, M., Melton, S., Childes, J., Coleman, T., Dailey, S., & Hoffman, H. (2007). Reliability of Clinician-Based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and Patient-Based (V-RQOL and IPVI) Documentation of Voice Disorders. Journal of Voice, 21, 576–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooijman, P., De Jong, F., Thomas, G., Huinck, W., Donders, R., Graamans, K., & Schutte, H. (2006). Risk factors for voice problems in teachers. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 58, 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiman, J., & Gerratt, B. (2000). Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment. The Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 108, 1867–1876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B., & Ito, M. (2007). When and why listeners disagree in voice quality assessment tasks. The Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 122, 2354–2364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B., Kempster, G., Erman, A., & Berke, G. (1993). Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 21–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laukkanen, A., & Kankare, E. (2006). Vocal Loading-Related Changes in Male teachers' voices investigated before and after a working day. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 58, 229–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laukkanen, A., Ilomäki, I., Leppänen, K., & Vilkman, E. (2008). Acoustic Measures and Self-reports of Vocal Fatigue by Female Teachers. Journal of Voice, 22, 283–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehto, L., Laaksonen, L., Vilkman, E., & Alku, P. (2006). Occupational voice complaints and objective acoustic measurements-do they correlate? Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 31, 147–152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lima-Silva, M., Ferreira, L., Oliveira, I., Silva, M., & Ghirardi, A. (2012). Distúrbio de voz em professores: autorreferência, avaliação perceptiva da voz e das pregas vocais. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia, 17, 391–397.
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado, G., & Greenland, S. (1993). Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 138, 923–936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maryn, Y., & Weenink, D. (2015). Objective Dysphonia Measures in the Program Praat: Smoothed Cepstral Peak Prominence and Acoustic Voice Quality Index. Journal of Voice, 29, 35–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maryn, Y., De Bodt, M., & Roy, N. (2010). The Acoustic Voice Quality Index: Toward improved treatment outcomes assessment in voice disorders. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43, 161–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslan, J., Leng, X., Rees, C., Blalock, D., & Butler, S. (2011). Maximum phonation time in healthy older adults. Journal of Voice, 25, 709–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millet, B., & Dejonckere, P. H. (1998). What determines the differences in perceptual rating of dysphonia between experienced raters? Folia Phoniatr Logop., 50, 305–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neiman, G., & Edeson, B. (1981). Procedural aspects of eliciting maximum phonation time. Folia Phoniatrica (Basel), 33, 285–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemr, K., Simões-Zenari, M., Cordeiro, G., Tsuji, D., Ogawa, A., Ubrig, M., & Menezes, M. (2012). GRBAS and Cape-V Scales: high reliability and consensus when applied at different times. Journal of Voice, 26, 812.e817–812.e822.
   Google Scholar
• Niebudek-Bogusz, E., Woznicka, E., Zamyslowska-Szmytke, E., & Sliwinska-Kowalska, M. (2010). Correlation between acoustic parameters and Voice Handicap Index in dysphonic teachers. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 62, 55–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, J. (2009). Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Disordered Voice quality: pros, cons and future directions. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 61, 49–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekkarinen, E., Himberg, L., & Pentti, J. (1992). Prevalence of vocal symptoms among teachers compared to nurses: A questionnaire study. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 17, 112–117.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Fernández, C., & Preciado López, J. (2003). Nódulos de cuerdas vocales. Factores de riesgo en los docentes. Estudio de casos y controles. Acta Otorrinolaringológica Española, 54, 253–260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Preciado-Lopez, J., Perez-Fernandez, C., Calzada-Uriondo, M., & Preciado-Ruiz, P. (2008). Epidemiological study of voice disorders among teaching professionals of La Rioja, Spain. Journal of Voice, 22, 489–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantala, L., & Vilkman, E. (1999). Relationship between subjective voice complaints and acoustic parameters in female teachers' voices. Journal of Voice, 13, 484–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sala, E., Laine, A., Simberg, S., Pentti, J., & Suonpaa, J. (2001). The prevalence of voice disorders among day care center teachers compared with nurses: A questionnaire and clinical study. Journal of Voice, 15, 413–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sataloff, R. T., Caputo Rosen, D., Hawkshaw, M., & Spiegel, J. R. (1997). The aging adult voice. Journal of Voice, 11, 156–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellars, C., Stanton, A. E., McConnachie, A., Dunnet, C. P., Chapman, L. M., Bucknall, C. E., & MacKenzie, K. (2009). Reliability of perceptions of voice quality: evidence from a problem asthma clinic population. Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 123, 755–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolander, S., & Huttunen, K. (2006). Voice problems experienced by Finnish comprehensive school teachers and realization of occupational health care. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 31, 166–171.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Souza, C., Carvalho, F., Araújo, T., Reis, E., Lima, V., & Porto, L. (2011). Factors associated with vocal fold pathologies in teachers. Revista de Saúde Pública, 45, 914–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speyer, R., Bogaardt, H., Passos, V., Roodenburg, N., Zumach, A., Heijnen, M., … Brunings, J. (2010). Maximum Phonation Time: Variability and Reliability. Journal of Voice, 24(3), 281–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares, E., & Martins, R. (2007). Vocal Evaluation in Teachers with or without symptoms. Journal of Voice, 21, 407–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toran, K., & Lal, B. (2009). Objective analysis of voice in normal young adults. Kathmandu University Medical Journal, 7, 374–377.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vaca, M., Mora, E., & Cobeta, I. (2015). The Aging voice: Influence of respiratory and laryngeal changes.Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, 153, 409–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, N. (2003). Occupational groups at risk of voice disorders: A review of the literature. Occupat.al Medicine, 53, 456–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi, H., Shrivastav, R., Andrews, M., & Niimi, S. (2003). A comparison of voice quality ratings made by Japanese and American listeners using the GRBAS scale. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 55, 147–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, P., Ouaknine, M., Revis, J., & Giovanni, A. (2001). Objective Voice Analysis for Dysphonic Patients: A multiparametric protocol including acoustic and aerodynamic measurements. Journal of Voice, 15, 529–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, P., Revis, J., Wuyts, F., Zanaret, M., & Giovanni, A. (2002). Correlation of Instrumental Voice Evaluation with Perceptual Voice Analysis Using a Modified Visual Analog Scale. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 54, 271–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar