Testing taxonomic boundaries and the limit of DNA barcoding in the Siberian sturgeon, Acipenser baerii

References

• Afanasiev SG. 2006. Ecological basis for breeding of the Baikal Sturgeon (Acipenser baeri baikalensis A. Nikolski), Dissertation. Irkutsk, Russia..
   Google Scholar
• Afanasiev GA, Afanasieva VG. 1996. The condition and reproduction of the Baikal sturgeon population. Rybovodstvo i Rybolovstvo. 2:6–7 (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Besansky NJ, Severson DW, Ferdig MT. 2003. DNA barcoding of parasites and invertebrate disease vectors: What you don't know can hurt you. Trends Parasitol. 12:545–546.
   Google Scholar
• Birstein VJ, Bemis WE. 1997. How many species are there within the genus Acipenser? In: Birstein VJ, Waldman JR, Bemis WE editors. Sturgeon biodiversity and conservation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers157–163.
   Google Scholar
• Birstein VJ, DeSalle R. 1998. Molecular phylogeny of Acipenserinae. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 9:141–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birstein VJ, Ruban G. 2004. A comment on the Siberian, Acipenser baerii, and Russian, Acipenser gueldenstaedtii, sturgeons. Environ Biol Fishes. 70:91–92.
   Google Scholar
• Birstein VJ, Doukakis P, Sorkin B, DeSalle R. 1998. Population aggregation analysis of caviar producing species of sturgeon and implications for diagnosis of black caviar. Conserv Biol. 12:766–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birstein VJ, Doukakis P, DeSalle R. 2000. Polyphyly of mtDNA lineages in the Russian sturgeon, Acipenser gueldenstaedtii: Forensic and evolutionary implications. Conserv Genet. 1:81–88.
   Google Scholar
• Birstein VJ, Ruban G, Ludwig A, Doukakis P, DeSalle R. 2005. The enigmatic Caspian Sea Russian sturgeon: How many cryptic forms does it contain?. Syst Biodivers. 3:203–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buroker NE, Brown JR, Gilbert TA, O'Hara PJ, Beckenbach AT, Thomas WK, Smith MJ. 1990. Length heteroplasmy of sturgeon mitochondrial DNA: An illegitimate elongation model. Genetics. 124:157–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa FO, Carvahlo GR. 2007. The barcode of life initiative: Synopsis and prospective societal impacts of DNA barcoding of fish. Genomics Soc Policy. 3:29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Dasmahapatra KK, Mallet J. 2006. DNA barcodes: Recent successes and future prospects. Heredity. 97:254–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis JI, Nixon KC. 1992. Populations, genetic variation, and the delimitation of phylogenetic species. Syst Biol. 41:421–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawnay N, Ogden R, McEwing R, Carvalho GR, Thorpe RS. 2007. Validation of the barcoding gene CO1 for use in forensic genetic species identification. Forensic Sci Int. 173:1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSalle R. 2006. Species discovery versus species identification in DNA barcoding efforts: Response to Rubinoff. Conserv Biol. 20:545–1447.
   Google Scholar
• DeSalle R. 2007. Phenetic and DNA taxonomy; a comment on Waugh. Bioessays. 29:1289–1290.
   Google Scholar
• DeSalle R, Birtsein VJ. 1996. PCR identification of black caviar. Nature. 381:197–198.
   Google Scholar
• DeSalle R, Williams AK, George M. 1993. Isolation and characterization of animal mitochondrial DNA. In: Zimmer EA, White TJ, Cann RL, Wilson AC editors. Molecular evolution: Producing biochemical data. Vol. 224. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 176–204.
   Google Scholar
• DeSalle R, Egan MG, Siddall M. 2005. The unholy trinity: Taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. 2005. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B. 360:1905–1916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doukakis P, Birstein VJ, Ruban GI, DeSalle R. 1999. Molecular genetic analysis among subspecies of two Eurasian sturgeon species, Acipenser baerii and A. stellatus. Mol Ecol. 8:S117–S127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekrem T, Willassen E, Stur E. 2007. A comprehensive DNA sequence library is essential for identification with DNA barcodes. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 43:530–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eschmeyer WN, editor. 2008. Catalog of fishes, [online version]. Available at: http://research.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. 2005. Arlequin ver. 3.0: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online. 1:47–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 3:294–299.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gómez A, Wright PJ, Lunt DH, Cancino JM, Carvalho GR, Hughes RN. 2007. Mating trials validate the use of DNA barcoding to reveal cryptic speciation of a marine bryozoan taxon. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B. 274:199–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol. 22:160–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, deWaard JR. 2003. Barcoding animal life: Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Philos Trans R Soc Ser B. 270:S96–S99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM. 2004. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol. 2:e312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickerson MJ, Meyer CP, Moritz C. 2006. DNA barcoding will often fail to discover new animal species over broad parameter space. Syst Biol. 55:729–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubert N, Hanner R, Holm E, Mandrak NE, Taylor E, Burridge M, . 2008. Identifying Canadian freshwater fishes through DNA barcodes. PLoS One. 3:e2490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 16:111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, . 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 23:2947–2948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefébure T, Douady CJ, Gouy M, Gibiert J. 2006. Relationship between morphological taxonomy and molecular divergence within Crustacea: Proposal of a molecular threshold to help species delimitation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 40:435–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipscomb D, Platnick N, Wheeler Q. 2003. The intellectual content of taxonomy: A comment on DNA taxonomy. Trends Ecol Evol. 18:64–66.
   Google Scholar
• Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2002. MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 3.0. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• McKelvey KS, Aubry KB, Schwartz MK. 2008. Using anecdotal occurrence data for rare or elusive species: The illusion of reality and a call for evidentiary standards. BioScience. 58:549–555.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer CP, Paulay G. 2005. DNA barcoding: Error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol. 3:e422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz C, Cicero C. 2004. DNA barcoding: Promises and pitfalls. PLoS Biol. 2:e354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neigel J, Domingo A, Stake J. 2007. DNA barcoding as a tool for coral reef conservation. Coral Reefs. 26:487–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pegg GG, Sinclair B, Briskey L, Aspden WJ. 2006. MtDNA barcode identification of fish larvae in the south Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Sci Mar. 70:7–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Por FD. 2007. A “taxonomic affidavit”: Why it is needed?. Integr Zool. 2:57–59.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 14:817–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendini L. 2005. Comment on “Identifying spiders through DNA barcoding”. Can J Zool. 83:498–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN. 2007. The barcode of life data systems (www.barcodinglife.org). Mol Ecol Notes. 7:355–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rock J, Costa FO, Walker DI, North AW, Hutchinson WF, Carvalho GR. 2008. DNA barcodes of fish of the Antarctic Scotia Sea indicate priority groups for taxonomic and systematics focus. Antarct Sci. 20:253–262.
   Google Scholar
• Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 19:1572–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruban GI. 1997. Species structure, contemporary distribution and status of the Siberian sturgeon, Acipenser baerii. Environ Biol Fishes. 48:221–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruban GI. 1998. On the species structure of the Siberian sturgeon Acipenser baerii Brandt (Acipenseridae). Voprosy Ikhtiologii. 38:307–327 (in Russian) (English translation: J Ichthyol 38, 345-365).
   Google Scholar
• Ruban GI. 1999. Siberian sturgeon Acipenser baerii (species structure and ecology). Moscow: (in Russian)GEOS235.
   Google Scholar
• Ruban GI. 2005. The Siberian sturgeon Acipenser baerii Brandt: Species structure and ecology. Special Publication No. 1. Norderstedt, Germany: Books on Demand, GmbKWorld Sturgeon Conservation Society.
   Google Scholar
• Ruban GI, Kholodova MV, Kalmykov VA, Sorokin PA. 2008. Morphological and molecular genetic study of the Persian sturgeon Acipenser persicus Borodin (Acipenseridae) taxonomic status. J Ichthyol. 48:891–903.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinoff D. 2006. Utility of mitochondrial DNA barcodes in species conservation. Conserv Biol. 20:1026–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruedas LA, Salazar-Bravo J, Dragoo JW, Yates TL. 2000. The Importance of being earnest: What, if anything, constitutes a “specimen examined?”. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 17:129–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schander C, Willassen E. 2005. What can biological barcoding do for marine biology?. Mar Biol Res. 1:79–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seberg O, Humphries CJ, Knapp S, Stevenson DW, Petersen G, Scharff N, Andersen NM. 2003. Shortcuts in systematics? A commentary on DNA-based taxonomy. Trends Ecol Evol. 18:63–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MA, Fisher B, Hebert PDN. 2005. DNA barcoding for effective biodiversity assessment of a hyperdiverse arthropod group: The ants of Madagascar. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B. 360:1825–1834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith PJ, McVeagh SM, Steinke D. 2008. DNA barcoding for the identification of smoked fish products. J Fish Biol. 72:464–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolov LI. 2001. The Siberian sturgeon—Its Lake Baikal subspecies, the Baikal sturgeon, Acipenser baerii baicalensis A. Nikolski, 1896. In: Danilov-Danielyan VI, editor. The Russian Federation red data book. Moscow: (in Russian) Astrel259–260.
   Google Scholar
• Sokolov LI, Vasil'ev VP. 1989. Acipenser baeri Brandt, 1869. General introduction to fishes Acipenseriformes. In: Holcik J, editor. The freshwater fishes of Europe. Vol. 1. Part-II Weisbaden: Aula-Verlag. 263–284.
   Google Scholar
• Spies IB, Gaichas S, Stevenson DE, Orr JW, Canino MF. 2006. DNA-based identification of Alaska skates (Amblyraja, Bathyraja and Raja: Rajidae) using cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (coI) variation. J Fish Biol. 69:283–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. 2003. PAUP^*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Version 4.0 beta. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Tarasova EN, Mamontov AA, Pastukhov MV. 1997. Dioxin and furan content in the body of Baikal seals. Dokl Biol Sci. 354:297–302.
   Google Scholar
• Victor BC. 2007. Coryphopterus kuna, a new goby (Perciformes: Gobiidae: Gobinae) from the western Caribbean, with the identification of the late larval stage and an estimate of the pelagic larval duration. Zootaxa. 1526:51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Victor BC. 2008. Redescription of Coryphopterus tortugae (Jordan) and a new allied species Coryphopterus bol (Perciformes: Gobiidae: Gobiinae) from the tropical western Atlantic Ocean. J Ocean Sci Found. 1:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PDN. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B. 360:1847–1957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Holmes BH, Zemlak TS, Smith PJ. 2007. DNA barcoding discriminates spurdogs of the genus Squalus. In: Last PR, White WT, Pogonoski JJ, editors. Descriptions of new dogfishes of the genus Squalus (Squaloidea: Squalidae). CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research Paper 014. Hobart, Australia, p 117–130.
   Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Holmes BH, Yearsley GK. DNA barcoding reveals a likely second species of Asian seabass (barramundi) (Lates calcarifer). J Fish Biol. 2008a; 72:458–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Holmes BH, White WT, Last PR. DNA barcoding Australian chondrichthyans: Results and potential uses in conservation. Mar Freshwater Res. 2008b; 59:57–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waugh J. 2007. DNA barcoding in animal species: Progress, potential and pitfalls. Bio Essays. 29:188–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong E, Hanner RH. 2008. DNA barcoding detects market substitution in North American seafood. Food Res Int. 41:828–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yancy HF, Zemlak TS, Mason JA, Washington JD, Tenge BJ, Nguyen NLT, . 2007. The potential use of DNA barcodes in regulatory science: Applications of the regulatory fish encyclopedia. J Food Prot. 70:210–217.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Z. 1994. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: Approximate methods. J Mol Evol. 39:306–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar