DNA barcoding discriminates freshwater fishes from southeastern Nigeria and provides river system-level phylogeographic resolution within some species

References

• Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389–3402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barret RDH, Hebert PDN. 2005. Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes. Can J Zool. 83:481–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berra TM. 2001. Freshwater fish distribution. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry O, Sarre SD, Farrington L, Aitken N. 2007. Faecal DNA detection of invasive species: The case of feral foxes in Tasmania. Wildlife Res. 34:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Caddy J, Garibaldi L. 2000. Apparent changes in the trophic composition of wild marine harvest: The perspective from FAO capture database. Ocean Coast Manag. 43:615–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho DC, Oliveira DAA, Pompeu PS, Leal CG, Oliveira C, Hanner R. Deep barcode divergence in Brazilian freshwater fishes – the case of the São Francisco river basin. Mitochond DNA. 2010 (in press).
   Google Scholar
• CBOL Plant Working Group. 2009. A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106:12794–12797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang CH, Rougerie R, Chen JH. 2008. Identifying earthworms through DNA barcodes: Pitfalls and promise. Pedobiologia. 52:171–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chantangsi C, Lynn DH, Brand MT, Cole JC, Hetrick N, Ikonomi P. 2007. Barcoding ciliates: A comprehensive study of 75 isolates of the genus Tetrahymena. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 57:2412–2425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clare LE, Lim BK, Engtrom MD, Ege JL, Hebert PDN. 2007. DNA barcoding of neotropical bats: Species identification and discovery within Guyana. Mol Ecol Notes. 7:184–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clare EL, Fraser EE, Braid HE, Fenton MB, Hebert PDN. 2009. Species on the menu of a generalist predator, the eastern red bat (Lasiurus borealis): Using a molecular approach to detect arthropod prey. Mol Ecol. 18:2532–2542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen NJ, Deeds JR, Wong ES, Hanner RH, Yancy HF, White KD, Thompson TM, Wahl M, Pham TD, Guichard FM, Huh I, Austin C, Dizikes G, Gerber SI. 2009. Public health response to puffer fish (tetrodotoxin) poisoning from mislabeled product. J Food Prot. 72:810–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper JK, Sykes G, King S, Cottrill K, Ivanova NV, Hanner R, Ikonomi P. 2007. Species identification in cell culture: A two-pronged molecular approach. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Animal. 43:344–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa FO, deWaard JR, Boutillier J, Ratnasignham S, Dooh RT, Hajibabaei M, Hebert PDN. 2007. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes: The case of the Crustacea. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 64:272–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cywinska A, Hunter FF, Hebert PDN. 2006. Identifying Canadian mosquito species through DNA barcodes. Med Vert Entomol. 20:413–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton MJ, Meyers GL, Kolokotronis SO, Leslie MS, Martin AP, Amato G. 2009. Barcoding bushmeat: Molecular identification of Central African and South American harvested vertebrates. Conserv Genet. 11:1389–1404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsasser SC, Floyd R, Hebert PDN, Schulte-Hostedde AI. 2009. Species identification of North American guinea worms (Nematoda: Dracunculus) with DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Res. 9:707–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst A, Becker S, Wollenzien UIA, Postius C. 2003. Ecosystem-dependent adaptive radiation of picocyanobacteria inferred from 16S rRNA and ITS-1 sequences analysis. Microbiol SGM. 149:217–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzhugh K. 2006. DNA barcoding: An instance of technology-driven science?. Bioscience. 56:462–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goa T, Yao H, Song J, Liu C, Zhu Y, Ma X, Pang X, Xu H, Chen S. 2010. Identification of medicinal plants in the family Fabaceae using a potential DNA barcode ITS2. J Ethnopharmacol. 130:116–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajibabaei M, Janzen DH, Burns JM, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN. 2006. DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:968–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball S, deWard J. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Biol Sci. 270:313–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Halluawachss W. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgeratux. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004a; 101:14812–14817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol. 2004b; 2:1657–1663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubert N, Hanner R, Holm E, Mandrak NE, Taylor E, Burridge M, Watkinson D, Dumont P, Curry A, Bentzen P, Zhang J, April J, Bernatchez L. 2008. Identifying Canadian freshwater fishes through DNA barcodes. PLoS One. 3:e2490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes JB, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR. 1997. Population diversity: Its extent and extinction. Science. 278:689–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova NV, deWaard JR, Hebert PDN. 2006. An inexpensive, automation-friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA. Mol Ecol Notes. 6:998–1002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova NV, Zemlak TS, Hanner RH, Hebert PDN. 2007. Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Notes. 7:544–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 16:111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane N. 2009. On the origin of bar codes. Nature. 426:272–274.
   Google Scholar
• Locke SA, Mclaughlin JD, Macroglose DJ. 2010. DNA barcodes show cryptic diversity and a potential physiological basis for host specificity among Diplostomoidea (Platyhelminthes: Digenea) parasitizing freshwater fish in the St Lawrence River canal. Mol Ecol. 19:2813–2827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz JG, Jackson WE, Beck JC, Hanner R. 2005. The problems and promise of DNA barcodes for species diagnosis of primate biomaterials. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 360:1869–1877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messing J. 1983. New M13 vectors for cloning. Methods Enzymol. 101:20–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz C, Cicero C. 2004. DNA barcoding: Promise and pitfalls. PLoS Biol. 2:1529–1531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Dor R. 2004. A census of marine life. Bioscience. 54:92–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olaosebikan BD, Raji A. 1998. Field guide to Nigerian freshwater fishes. New Bussa, Nigeria: Federal College of Freshwater Fisheries Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Peppin L, McEwring R, Carvalho GR, Ogden RA. 2008. A DNA based approach for the forensic identification of Asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus) in traditional Asian medicine. J Forensic Sci. 53:1358–1362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira LHG, Maia GMG, Hanner R, Foresti F, Oliveira C. DNA barcodes discriminate freshwater fishes from the Paraíba do Sul River Basin, São Paulo, Brazil. Mitochond DNA. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen RSS, Morrissey MT, Hebert PDN. 2009. DNA barcoding of commercial important salmon and trout species (Oncorhynchus and Salmo) from North America. J Agric Food Chem. 57:8379–8385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN. 2007. BOLD: The barcode of life data system (www.barcoding.life.org). Mol Ecol Notes. 7:355–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinoff D, Cameron S, Will K. 2006. A genomic perspective on the shortcomings of mitochondrial DNA for ‘barcoding’ identification. J Hered. 97:581–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing evolutionary trees. Mol Biol Evol. 4:406–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders G. 2005. Applying DNA barcoding to red macroalgae: Preliminary appraisal holds promise for future applications. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 360:1879–1888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifert KA, Sampson RA, deWard JR, Houbraken J, Levesque CA, Moncalvo JM, . 2007. Prospects for fungus identification using COI DNA barcodes with Penicillium as a test case. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:3901–3906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith PJ, McVeagh SM, Allain V, Sanchez C. 2005. DNA identification of gut contents of large pelagic fishes. J Fish Biol. 67:1178–1183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sogin ML, Morrison HG, Hube JA, Welch DM, Huse SM, Neal PR, Arrieta JM, Herndl GJ. 2006. Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the unexpected ‘rare biosphere’. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:12115–12120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song H, Buhay JE, Whiting MF. 2008. Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the number of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coamplified. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:13486–13491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinke D, Hanner R, Hebert PDN. Rapid high-quality imaging of fishes using a flat-bed scanner. Ichthyol Res. 2009a; 56:210–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinke D, Zemlak TS, Hebert PDN. Barcoding Nemo: DNA-based identifications for the ornamental fish trade. PLoS One. 2009b; 4:e6300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockinger H, Kruger M, Schussler A. 2010. DNA barcoding of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 187:461–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swartz ER, Mwale M, Hanner R. 2008. A role for barcoding in the study of African fish diversity. South Afr J Sci. 104:293–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdez-Moreno M, Ivanova NV, Elias-Gutierrez M, Contreras-Balderas S, Hebert PDN. 2009. Probing diversity in freshwater fishes from Mexico and Guatemala with DNA barcodes. J Fish Biol. 74:377–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PDN. 2005. Barcoding Australia's fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 360:1847–1857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Hanner R, Hebert PDN. 2009. The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. J Fish Biol. 74:329–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters JM, Cambray JA. 1997. Intraspecific phylogeography of the Cape galaxias from South Africa: Evidence from mitochondrial DNA sequences. J Fish Biol. 50:1329–1338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson JJ. 2010. Assessing the value of DNA barcodes and other priority gene regions for molecular phylogenetics of Lepidoptera. PLoS ONE. 5:e10525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson-Wilde L, Norman J, Robertson J, Sarre S, Georges A. Current issues in species identification for forensic science and the validity of using the cytochrome oxidase 1 (COI) gene. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2010 Doi: 10.1007/s12024-010-9172-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wishart M, Hughes J, Stewart B, Impson D. 2006. An extreme level of intra-specific divergence among Cape Peninsula populations of the Cape galaxias, Galaxias zebratus Castelnau 1861, reveals a possible species complex. Afr J Aquat Sci. 31:99–106.
   Google Scholar
• Won WJ, Sivasundar A, Wang Y, Hey J. 2005. On the origin of Lake Malawi cichlid species. A population genetic analysis of divergence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:6581–6586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong E, Hanner RH. 2008. DNA barcoding detects market substitution in North American sea food. Food Res Int. 41:828–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yancy HF, Zemlak TS, Mason JA, Washington JD, Tenge BJ, Nguyen NT, Barnett JD, Savary WE, Hill WE, Moore MM, Fry FS, Randolph SC, Rogers PL, Hebert PDN. 2008. Potential use of DNA barcodes in regulatory science: Applications of the regulatory fish Encyclopedia. J Food Prot. 71:210–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar