Character-based, population-level DNA barcoding in Mexican species of Zamia L. (Zamiaceae: Cycadales)

References

• Bergmann T, Hadrys H, Breves G, Schierwater B. 2009. Character-based DNA barcoding: A superior tool for species identification. Berl Münch Tierärztl Wochenschr. 122:446–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caputo P, Cozzolino S, Gaudio L, Moretti A, Stevenson D. 1996. Karyology and phylogeny of some Mesoamerican species of Zamia (Zamiaceae). Am J Bot. 83:1513–1520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caputo P, Cozzolino S, De Luca P, Moretti A, Stevenson D. 2004. Molecular phylogeny of Zamia. In: Walters T, Osborne R. editors. Cycad classification: Concepts and recommendations. Oxford: CABI Publishing. p 149–158.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth PM, Forrest LL, Spouge JL, Hajibabaei M, Ratnasingham S, van der Bank M, , CBOL PWG. 2009. A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106:12794–12797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase MW, Soltis DE, Olmstead RG, Morgan D, Les DH, Mishler BD, Duvall MR, Price RA, Hills HG, Qiu Y-L, Kron KA, Rettig JH, Conti E, Palmer JD, Manhart JR, Sytsma KJ, Michaels HJ, Kress WJ, Karol KG, Clark WD, Hedren M, Gaut BS, Jansen RK, Kim K-J, Wimpee CF, Smith JF, Furnier GR, Strauss SH, Qui-Yun Xiang, Plunkett GM, Soltis PS, Swensen SM, Williams SE, Gadek PA, Quinn CJ, Eguiarte LE, Golenberg E, Learn GHJr, Graham SW, Barrett SCH, Dayanandan S, Albert VA. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 80:528–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase MW, Salamin N, Wilkinson M, Dunwell JM, Kesanakurth RP, Haidar N, Savolainen V. 2005. Land plants and DNA barcodes: Short-term and long-term goals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 360:1889–1895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase MW, Cowan RS, Hollingsworth PM, van der Berg C, Madriñán S, Petersen G, Seberg O, Jørgensen T, Cameron KM, Carine M, Pedersen N, Hedderson TAJ, Conrad F, Salazar GA, Richardson JE, Hollingsworth ML, Barraclough G, Kelly L, Wilkinson M. 2007. A proposal for a standardized protocol to barcode all land plants. Taxon. 56:295–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan RS, Chase MW, Kress WJ, Savolainen V. 2006. 300,000 species to identity: Problems, progress, and prospects in DNA barcoding of land plants. Taxon. 55:611–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSalle R. 2006. Species discovery versus species identification in DNA barcoding efforts: Response to Rubinoff. Conserv Biol. 20:1545–1547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSalle R. 2007. Phenetic and DNA taxonomy; a comment on Waugh. BioEssays. 29:1289–1290.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeSalle R, Egan MG, Siddall ME. 2005. The unholy trinity: Taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 360:1905–1916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull. 19:11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Eckenwalder JE. 1980. Taxonomy of the West Indian cycads. J Arnold Arbor Harv Univ. 61:701–722.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson DL, Spouge J, Resch A, Weigt LA, Kress WJ. 2008. DNA barcoding in land plants: Developing standards to quantify and maximize success. Taxon. 57:1304–1316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazekas AJ, Burgess KS, Kesanakurti PR, Graham SW, Newmaster SG, Husband BC, . 2008. Multiple multilocus DNA barcodes from the plastid genome discriminate plant species equally well. PLoS ONE. 3:e2802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazekas AJ, Kesanakurti PR, Burgess KS, Percy DM, Graham SW, Barrett SCH, . 2009. Are plant species inherently harder to discriminate than animal species using DNA barcoding markers?. Mol Ecol Resour. 1 Suppl: 130–139.
   Google Scholar
• Ford CS, Ayres KL, Toomey N, Haider N, van Alphen Stahl J, Kelly LJ. 2009. Selection of candidate coding DNA barcoding regions for use on land plants. Bot J Linn Soc. 159:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Géigel LG. 2003. Zamiaceae. Flora Rep Cuba Ser A. 8:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 41:95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc London B Biol Sci. 2003a; 270:313–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, de Waard JR. Barcoding animal life: Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc R Soc London B Biol Sci. 2003b; 270 Suppl: S96–S99.
   Google Scholar
• Hilu KW, Borsch T, Müller K, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Savolainen V, . 2003. Angiosperm phylogeny based on matK sequence information. Am J Bot. 90:1758–1776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang S, Chiang YC, Schaal BA, Chou CH, Chiang TY. 2001. Organelle DNA phylogeography of Cycas taitungensis, a relict species in Taiwan. Mol Ecol. 10:2669–2681.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kress WJ, Erickson DL. 2007. A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: The coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS ONE. 2:e508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, Janzen DH. 2005. Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:8369–8374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahaye R, Savolainen V, Duthoit S, Maurin O, van der Bank M. 2008a. A test of psbK-psbI and atpF-atpH as potential plant DNA barcodes using the flora of the Kruger National Park as a model system (South Africa), Nat Prec, hdl:10101/npre.2008.1896.1 (posted May 2008, retrieved July 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Lahaye R, van der Bank M, Bogarin D, Warner J, Pupulin F, Gigot G, . DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008b; 105:2923–2928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little DP, Stevenson DW. 2007. A comparison of algorithms for the identification of species using DNA barcodes: Examples for gymnosperms. Cladistics. 23:1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenstein JH, Amato G, Kolokotronis SO. 2009. The real maccoyii: Identifying tuna fish with DNA barcodes—Contrasting characteristic attributes and genetic distances. PLoS ONE. 4:e7866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2010. Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.73 [Online]. Available at: http://mesquiteproject.org.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolalde-Morejón F, Vovides AP, Stevenson DW. 2009. Taxonomic revision of Zamia in Mega-Mexico. Brittonia. 61:301–335.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolalde-Morejón F, Vergara-Silva F, González-Astorga J, Stevenson DW, Vovides AP, Sosa V. 2010. A character-based approach in the Mexican cycads supports diverse multigene combinations for DNA barcoding Cladistics, in press. doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00321.x.
   Google Scholar
• Pennisi E. 2007. Wanted: A barcode for plants. Science. 318:190–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rach J, DeSalle R, Sarkar IN, Schierwater B, Hadrys H. 2008. Character-based DNA barcoding allows discrimination of genera, species and populations in Odonata. Proc R Soc London B Biol Sci. 275:237–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rzedowski J. 1991. Vegetación de México. Mexico City: Limusa. p 431.
   Google Scholar
• Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 4:406–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar IN, Planet PJ, DeSalle R. 2008. CAOS software for use in character-based DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Resour. 8:1256–1259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sass C, Little DP, Stevenson DW, Specht CD. 2007. DNA barcoding in the Cycadales: Testing the potential of proposed barcoding markers for species Identification of cycads. PLoS ONE. 2:e1154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson DW. 1987. Again, the West Indian Zamias. Fairchild Trop Gard Bull. 42:23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP^*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (^*and other methods). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:4876–4882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar