DNA barcoding unveils a high rate of mislabeling in a commercial freshwater catfish from Brazil

References

• Ardura A, Linde AR, Moreira JC, Garcia-Vazquez E. 2010. DNA barcoding for conservation and management of amazonian commercial fish. Biol Conserv. 143:1438–1443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker CS, Lento GM, Cipriano F, Palumbi SR. 2000. Predicted decline of protected whales based on molecular genetic monitoring of Japanese and korean markets. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 267:1191–1199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbuto M, Galimberti A, Ferri E, Labra M, Malandra R, Galli P, Casiraghi M. 2010. DNA barcoding reveals fraudulent substitutions in shark seafood products: The italian case of “Palombo” (Mustelus spp.). Food Res Int. 43:376–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bignotto TS, Prioli AJ, Prioli SMAP, Maniglia TC, Boni TA, Lucio LC, Gomes RA, Oliveira VN, Prioli AV, Júlio HFJr, Prioli LM. 2009. Genetic divergence between Pseudoplatystoma corruscans and Pseudoplatystoma reticulatum (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae) in the parana river basin. Braz J Biol. 69:681–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitrago-Suarez UA, Burr BM. 2007. Taxonomy of the catfish genus Pseudoplatystoma Bleeker (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae) with recognition of eight species. Zootaxa. 1512:1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho DC, Seerig AS, Melo DC, Sousa AB, Pimenta D, Oliveira DAA. 2008. Identificação molecular de peixes: O caso do surubim (Pseudoplatystoma spp.). Rev Bras Reprod Anim. 32:215–219.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho DC, Oliveira DAA, Pompeu PS, Leal CG, Oliveira C, Hanner R. 2011. Deep barcode divergence in brazilian freshwater fishes—the case of the São Francisco river basin. Mitochondrial DNA. 22 Suppl 1 Epub.
   Google Scholar
• Civera T. 2003. Species identification and safety of fish products. Vet Res Commun. 27:481–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen NJ, Deeds JR, Wong ES, Hanner RH, Yancy HF, White KD, Thompson TM, Wahl M, Pham TD, Guichard FM, Huh I, Austin C, Dizikes G, Gerber SI. 2009. Public health response to puffer fish (tetrodotoxin) poisoning from mislabeled product. J Food Prot. 72:810–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawnay N, Ogden R, McEwing R, Carvalho GR, Thorpe RS. 2007. Validation of the barcoding gene COI for use in forensic genetic species identification. Forensic Sci Int. 173:1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSalle R, Birstein VJ. 1996. PCR identification of black caviar. Nature. 381:197–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espineira M, Gonzalez-Lavin N, Vieites JM, Santaclara FJ. 2008. Development of a method for the genetic identification of flatfish species on the basis of mitochondrial DNA sequences. J Agric Food Chem. 56:8954–8961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence-limits on phylogenies—an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 39:783–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filonzi L, Chiesa S, Vaghi M, Nonnis Marzano F. 2010. Molecular barcoding reveals mislabelling of commercial fish products in Italy. Food Res Int. 43:1383–1388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froese R, Pauly D, Editors. 2011. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org, version (02/2011).
   Google Scholar
• Godinho AL, Kynard B, Godinho HP. 2007. Migration and spawning of female surubim (Pseudoplatystoma corruscans, Pimelodidae) in the São Francisco river, Brazil. Environ Biol Fish. 80:421–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Gregory TR. 2005. The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Syst Biol. 54:852–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubert N, Hanner R, Holm E, Mandrak NE, Taylor E, Burridge M, Watkinson D, Dumont P, Curry A, Bentzen P, Zhang J, April J, Bernatchez L. 2008. Identifying canadian freshwater fishes through DNA barcodes. PLoS ONE. 3:e2490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerome M, Martinsohn JT, Ortega D, Carreau P, Verrez-Bagnis V, Mouchel O. 2008. Toward fish and seafood traceability: Anchovy species determination in fish products by molecular markers and support through a public domain database. J Agric Food Chem. 56:3460–3469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 16:111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M. 2004. MEGA3: Integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform. 5:150–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle CJ, Wilson CC. 2007. Mitochondrial DNA identification of game and harvested freshwater fish species. Forensic Sci Int. 166:68–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenstein JH, Burger J, Jeitner CW, Amato G, Kolokotronis SO, Gochfeld M. 2010. DNA barcodes reveal species-specific mercury levels in tuna sushi that pose a health risk to consumers. Biol Lett. 6:692–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manel S, Berthier P, Luikart G. 2002. Detecting wildlife poaching: Identifying the origin of individuals with bayesian assignment tests and multilocus genotypes. Conserv Biol. 16:650–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marko PB, Lee SC, Rice AM, Gramling JM, Fitzhenry TM, McAlister JS, Harper GR, Moran AL. 2004. Fisheries: Mislabelling of a depleted reef fish. Nature. 430:309–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez I, James D, Loréal H. 2005. Application of modern analytical techniques to ensure seafood safety and authenticity. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Moretti VM, Turchini GM, Bellagama F, Caprino F. 2003. Traceability issues in fishery and aquaculture products. Vet Res Commun. 27:497–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson LA, Wallman JF, Dowton M. 2007. Using COI barcodes to identify forensically and medically important blowflies. Med Vet Entomol. 21:44–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauly D, Christensen V, Guenette S, Pitcher TJ, Sumaila UR, Walters CJ, Watson R, Zeller D. 2002. Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature. 418:689–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen RS, Morrissey MT. 2008. DNA-based methods for the identification of commercial fish and seafood species. Compr Rev Food Sci F. 7:280–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN. 2007. BOLD: The barcode of life data system (www.Barcodinglife.Org). Mol Ecol Notes. 7:355–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinoff D. 2006. Utility of mitochondrial DNA barcodes in species conservation. Conserv Biol. 20:1026–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinoff D, Cameron S, Will K. 2006. A genomic perspective on the shortcomings of mitochondrial DNA for “barcoding” identification. J Hered. 97:581–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 4:406–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Springs Harbor, NY, Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory Press. 1659p.
   Google Scholar
• Sevilla RG, Diez A, Noren M, Mouchel O, Jerome M, Verrez-Bagnis V, Van Pelt H, Favre-Krey L, Krey G, Consortium TF, Bautista JM. 2007. Primers and polymerase chain reaction conditions for DNA barcoding teleost fish based on the mitochondrial cytochrome b and nuclear rhodopsin genes. Mol Ecol Notes. 7:730–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith PJ, Mcveagh SM, Steinke D. 2008. DNA barcoding for the identification of smoked fish products. J Fish Biol. 72:464–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teletchea F, Maudet C, Hanni C. 2005. Food and forensic molecular identification: Update and challenges. Trends Biotechnol. 23:359–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terol J, Mascarell R, Fernandez-Pedrosa V, Perez-Alonso M. 2002. Statistical validation of the identification of tuna species: Bootstrap analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences. J Agric Food Chem. 50:963–969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrico JP, Hubert N, Desmarais E, Duponchelle F, Rodriguez JN, Montoya-Burgos J, Montoya-Burgos J, Garcia Davila C, Carvajal-Vallejos FM, Grajales AA, Bonhomme F, Renno JF. 2009. Molecular phylogeny of the genus pseudoplatystoma (Bleeker, 1862): Biogeographic and evolutionary implications. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 51:588–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdez-Moreno M, Ivanova NV, Elias-Gutierrez M, Contreras-Balderas S, Hebert PDN. 2009. Probing diversity in freshwater fishes from mexico and guatemala with DNA barcodes. J Fish Biol. 74:377–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinas J, Tudela S. 2009. A validated methodology for genetic identification of tuna species (genus Thunnus). PLoS ONE. 4:e7606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PDN. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philos Trans R Soc B. 360:1847–1857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Hanner R, Hebert PDN. 2009. The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. J Fish Biol. 74:329–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong EHK, Hanner RH. 2008. DNA barcoding detects market substitution in north american seafood. Food Res Int. 41:828–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yancy HF, Zemlak TS, Mason JA, Washington JD, Tenge BJ, Nguyen NL, Barnett JD, Savary WE, Hill WE, Moore MM, Fry FS, Randolph SC, Rogers PL, Hebert PD. 2008. Potential use of DNA barcodes in regulatory science: Applications of the regulatory fish encyclopedia. J Food Prot. 71:210–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar