Molecular phylogenetic relationships of family Haemulidae (Perciformes: Percoidei) and the related species based on mitochondrial and nuclear genes

References

• Bernardi G, Jennifer L. 2005. Tempo and mode of speciation in the Baja California disjunct fish species Anisotremus davidsonii. Mol Ecol. 14:4085–4096.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bernardi G, Alva-Campbell YR, Gasparini JL, Floeter SR. 2008. Molecular ecology, speciation, and evolution of the reef fish genus Anisotremus. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 48:929–935.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown WM, George M Jr, Wilson AC. 1979. Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 76:1967–1971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter KE, Niem VH. 2001. FAO Species identification guide for fishery purposes. ISSN 1020–6868. The living marine resources of the Western Central Pacific. Vol. 5: Bony fishes part 3 (Menidae to Pomacentridae). Rome: FAO2961–2989.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter KE, Johnson GD. 2002. A phylogeny of sparoid fishes (Perciformes, Percoidei) based on morphology. Ichthyol Res.. 49:114–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CH. 2004. Checklist of the fishes of Penghu, FRI Special Publication No. 4. 175 pp. 92.
   Google Scholar
• Dirk S, Tyler SZ, Paul DNH. 2009. Barcoding Nemo: DNA-based identifications for the ornamental fish trade. PLoS One. 4 7: 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Eytan RI, Hastings PA, Holland BR. 2012. Reconciling molecules and morphology: Molecular systematics and biogeography of Neotropical blennies (Acanthemblemaria). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 62 1: 159–173.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FAO-FIES. 2010. Aquatic sciences and fisheries information system (ASFIS) species list, available at http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en (accessed March 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Farris JS, Kallersjo M, Kluge AG, Bult C. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics. 10:315–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farris JS, Kallersjo M, Kluge AG, Bult C. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst Biol. 44:570–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 39 4: 783–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fessler JL, Westneat MW. 2007. Molecular phylogenetics of the butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae): Taxonomy and biogeography of a global coral reef fish family. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 45 1: 50–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fowler HW. 1939. A synopsis of the fishes of China. Part Vii, continued. The perch-like fishes: Family Pomadasyidae, the Grunts. Philadelphia, PA: The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia141–164.
   Google Scholar
• Freihofer WC. 1963. Patterns of the ramus lateralis accessorius and their systematic significance in teleostean fishes. Stanford Ichthyol Bull. 8:80–189.
   Google Scholar
• Froese R, Pauly D. 2001. FishBase.–iNet, available at http://www.fishbase.org.
   Google Scholar
• Froese R, Pauly D. 2006. “Haemulidae”FishBase. March 2006 version. N.p.: FishBase.
   Google Scholar
• Froese R, Pauly D. 2011. FishBase, World Wide Web Electronic Publication available at http://www.fishbase.org (accessed March 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics. 17:754–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson GD. 1980. The limits and relationships of the Lutjanidae and associated families. Bull Scripps Inst Oceanogr. 24:1–111.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson GD. 1984. Percoidei: Development and relationships. In: Moser HG, Richards WJ, Cohen DM, Fahay MP, Kendall AWJr., Richardson SL. editors. Ontogeny and systematics of fishesAmerican Society of Ichthyolologists and Herpetologists, Special Publication No. 1464–498.
   Google Scholar
• Lee SC, Tsai MP. 1999. Molecular systematics of the thornfishes genera Terapon and Pelates (Perciformes: Teraponidae) with reference to the new genus Pseudoterapon. Zool Stud. 38 3: 279–286.
   Google Scholar
• Levy A, Wirtz P, Floeter SR, Almada VC. 2011. The Lusitania Province as a center of diversification: The phylogeny of the genus Microlipophrys (Pisces: Blenniidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 58 2: 409–413.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindberg GU. 1974. Fishes of the world. A key to families and a checklist. London: Israel program for scientific translations.
   Google Scholar
• Longenecker K, Bolick H, Allison A. 2008. A Preliminary account of marine fish diversity and exploitation at Kamiali Wildlife Management Area, Papua New GuineaBishop Museum Press91HoluluHawaii96718USA.
   Google Scholar
• López-Fernández H, Winemiller KO, Honeycutt RL. 2010. Multilocus phylogeny and rapid radiations in Neotropical cichlid fishes (Perciformes: Cichlidae: Cichlinae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 55 3: 1070–1086.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKay RJ. 1984. Haemulidae. In: Fischer W, Bianchi G. editors. FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes. Western Indian Ocean (Fishing Area 51). Rome: FAOVol. 2.
   Google Scholar
• McKay RJ. 2001. Family Haemulidae. In: Carpenter K, Niem VH. editors. Species identification guide for fishery purposes. The living marine resources of the western central Pacific. Bony fishes part 3 (Menidae to Pomacentridae). Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Miller TL, Cribb TH. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships of some common Indo-Pacific snappers (Perciformes: Lutjanidae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences, with comments on the taxonomic position of the Caesioninae. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 44:450–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Near TJ, Pesavento JJ, Cheng CH. 2004. Phylogenetic investigations of Antarctic notothenioid fishes (Perciformes: Notothenioidei) using complete gene sequences of the mitochondrial encoded 16S rRNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 32 3: 881–891.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson JS. 2006. Fishes of the world. New York: Wiley368–369.
   Google Scholar
• Orrell TM, Carpenter KE. 2004. A phylogeny of the fish family Sparidae (porgies) inferred from mitochondrial sequence data. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 32:425–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbi SR. 1996. Nucleic acids II: The polymerase chain reaction. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK. editors. Molecular systematics. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates205–247.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D, Buckley TR. 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: Advantages of the AIC and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst Biol. 53:793–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posada D, Crandall K. 1998. Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 14:817–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramesh R, Nammalwar P. 2008. Database on coastal information of Tamilnadu. Chennai: Institute for Ocean Management, Anna University1–132.
   Google Scholar
• Randall JE, Lim KKP. A checklist of the fishes of the South China Sea. Raffles Bull Zool. 2000Suppl. 8: 569–667.
   Google Scholar
• Ren G, Zhang Q. 2007. Phylogeny of haemulid with discussion on systematic position of the genus Hapalogenys. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica. 32:835–841.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha LA, Rosa IL. New species of Haemulon (Teleostei: Haemulidae) from the northeastern Brazilian coast. Copeia. 19992: 447–452.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha LA, Lindeman KC, Rocha CR. 2008. Historical biogeography and speciation in the reef fish genus Haemulon (Teleostei: Haemulidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 48:918–928.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 19:1572–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao KT, Ho HC, Lin PL, Lee PF, Lee MY, Tsai CY, Liao YC, Lin YC. A checklist of the fishes of southern Taiwan, northern South China Sea. Raffles B Zool. 2008Suppl. 19: 233–271.
   Google Scholar
• Shen SJ. 1993. Fishes of Taiwan. Taipei: Department of Zoology, National Taiwan University360–363 (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Smith LL, Fessler JL, Alfaro ME, Streelman JT, Westneat MW. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships and the evolution of regulatory gene sequences in the parrotfishes. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 49 1: 136–152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute (SCSFRI), Xiamen fisheries college. 1979. The fishes of the Islands in the South China Sea. Beijing: Science Press209–216 (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Sparks JS, Schelly RC. 2011. A new species of Paretroplus (Teleostei: Cichlidae: Etroplinae) from northeastern Madagascar, with a phylogeny and revised diagnosis for the P. damii clade. Zootaxa. 2768:55–68.
   Google Scholar
• Springer VG, Raasch MS. Fishes, angling, and finfish fisheries on stamps of the world. American Topical Association. Fishes on stamps handbook. 1995129: 1–110.
   Google Scholar
• Streelman TJ, Karl SA. 1997. Reconstructing labroid evolution with single-copy nuclear DNA. Proc R Soc Lond B. 264:1011–1020.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swofford DP. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods) Version 10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
   Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. 2007. MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 24:1596–1599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22 22: 4673–4680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vawter L, Brown WM. 1986. Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA comparisons reveal extreme rate variation in the molecular clock. Science. 234:194–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yagishita N, Kobayashi T, Nakabo T. 2002. Review of monophyly of the Kyphosidae (sensu Nelson, 1994), inferred from the mitochondrial ND2 gene. Ichthyol Res. 49:103–108.
   Google Scholar
• Yagishita N, Miya M, Yamanoue Y, Shirai SM, Nakayama K, Suzuki N, Satoh TP, Mabuchi K, Nishida M, Nakabo T. 2009. Mitogenomic evaluation of the unique facial nerve pattern as a phylogenetic marker within the percifom fishes (Teleostei:Percomorpha). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 53:258–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yearsley GK, Last PR, Hoese DF. 2006. Standard names of Australian fishes, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research Paper 009 p 1–65.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshizawa K, Johnson KP. 2003. Phylogenetic position of Phthiraptera (Insecta: Paraneoptera) and elevated rate of evolution in mitochondrial 12S and 16S rDNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 29:102–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou JY, Zhang Q, Tang YL, Yu FY, Zhao S. 2010. On phylogenetic relationships of Teraponidae in coastal waters of China. Mar Fish. 32 4: 351–355.
   Google Scholar