Phylogenetic analysis using d-loop marker of mtDNA of Saudi native chicken strains

References

• Allendorf FW, Luikart G. 2006. Conservation and the genetics of populations. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• AOU (The American Ornithologists' Union). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Lawrence, Kansas: AOU Press829.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Yousef MY. 2007. A survey study on the distribution of Saudi baladi chickens and their characteristics. Int J Poult Sci. 6:289–292.
   Google Scholar
• Avise JC, Zink RM. 1988. Molecular genetic divergence between avian sibling species: King and Clapper rails, Long-billed and Short-billed dowitchers, Boated-tailed and Great-tailed grackles, and Tufted and Black-crested titmice. Auk. 105:516–528.
   Google Scholar
• Avise JC, Arnold J, Ball RM, Bermingham E, Lamb T, Neigel JE, Reeb CA, Saunders NC. 1987. Intraspecific phylogeography: The mitochondrial bridge between population genetics and systematics. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 18:489–522.
   Google Scholar
• Avise JC, Glenn CJ. 1998. A comparative summary of genetic distances in the vertebrates from the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Mol Biol Evol. 15 11: 1481–1490.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Avise JC, Walker D. 1999. Species realities and numbers in sexual vertebrates: Perspectives from an asexually transmitted genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:992–995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks RC, Cicero C, Dunn JL, Kratter AW, Ouellet H, Rasmussen PC, Remsen JVJr, Rising JD, Stotz DF. 2000. Forty-second supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union checklist of North American birds. Auk. 117:847–858.
   Google Scholar
• Banks RC, Cicero C, Dunn JL, Kratter AW, Rasmussen PC, Remsen JVJr, Rising JD, Stotz DF. 2002. Forty-third supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union checklist of North American birds. Auk. 119:897–906.
   Google Scholar
• Banks RC, Cicero C, Dunn JL, Kratter AW, Rasmussen PC, Remsen JVJr, Rising JD, Stotz DF. 2003. Forty-fourth supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union checklist of North American birds. Auk. 120:923–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn TM, Cassey P, Gaston KJ. 2000. Variations on a theme: Sources of heterogeneity in the form of the interspecific relationship between abundance and distribution. J Anim Ecol. 75:1426–1439.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley DG, MacHugh DE, Cunningham P, Loftus RT. 1996. Mitochondrial diversity and the origin of the African and European cattle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:5131–5135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown WM, George M, Wilson AC. 1979. Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 76:1967–1971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown WM, Prager EM, Wang A, Wilson AC. 1982. Mitochondrial DNA sequences of primates: Tempo and mode of evolution. J Mol Evol. 18:225–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng GC, Liu KF, Zhang Q, Wang L, Duan ZX, Li XY, Liu RS, Yu Q. 1996. Studies on genetic relationship between red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) and domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Acta Genet Sinica. 23:96.
   Google Scholar
• Claridge MF, Dawah HA, Wilson MR. 1997. Species: The units of biodiversity. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Desjardins P, Morais R. 1990. Sequence and gene organization of the chicken mitochondrial genome. A novel gene order in higher vertebrates. J Mol Biol. 212:599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. 2004. Methodologies to identify, evaluate and conserve poultry genetic resources., Weigned S, Romanov MN, and Rath D. World's Poultry Congress 2004, June 8–13, Istanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel OH, Soulé ME. 1981. Conservation and evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA. 2002. Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA. 2010. Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Funk DJ, Omland KE. 2003. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: Frequency, causes and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 34:397–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill FB, Slikas B. 1992. Patterns of mitochondrial DNA divergence in North American crested titmice. Condor. 94:20–28.
   Google Scholar
• Glaus KR, Zanssenhause HP, Fechheimer NS, Perlman PS. 1980. Avian mtDNA: Structure, organization, and evolution. In: Kroon AM, Saccone C. editors. The organization and expression of the mitochondrial DNA genome. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing131–135.
   Google Scholar
• Granevitze Z, Hillel J, Feldman M, Six A, Eding H, Weigend S. 2009. Genetic structure of a wide-spectrum chicken gene pool. Anim Genet. 40:686–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM. 2004. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol. 2 10: 312 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 6:111–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XY, Cheng GC, Duan ZX, Zhang Q, Liu KF, Wang L, Qi HS. 1996. Analysis on blood-group gene population genetics and plasma protein polymorphism of white layer. Acta Vet Zootech Sinica. 27:142.
   Google Scholar
• Luikart G, Giellly L, Excoffier L, Vigne JD, Bouuvet J, Taberlet P. 2001. Multiple maternal origins and weak phylogeographic structure in domestic goats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98:5927–5932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma JG, Lu XZ. 1993. Studies on the serum protein polymorphisms and the genetic relationships of the black bone chickens. Acta Vet Zootech Sinica. 24:12.
   Google Scholar
• Mindell DP, Sorenson MD, Huddleston CJ, Miranda HC, Knight A, Sawchuk SJ, Yuri T. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships among and within select avian orders based on mitochondrial DNA. In: Mindell DP. editors. Avian molecular evolution and systematics. New York: Academic Press214–247.
   Google Scholar
• Moore WS. 1995. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: Mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution. 49:718–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray BW, McGillivray WB, Barlow JC, Beech RN, Strobeck C. 1994. The use of cytochrome b sequence variation in estimation of phylogeny in the Vireonidae. Condor. 96:1037–1054.
   Google Scholar
• Niu D, Fu Y, Luo J, Ruan H, Yu Y, Chen G, Ya-Ping Zhang Y. 2002. The origin and genetic diversity of Chinese native chicken breeds. Biochem Genet. 40:163–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma D, Appa RKBC, Singh RV, Totey SM. 2001. Genetic diversity among chicken breeds estimated through randomly amplified polymorphic DNA. Anim Biotechnol. 12 2: 111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Nei M, Kumar S. 2004. Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:11030–11035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 28:2731–2739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakana S, Wakanabe T, Hayashi Y, Tomita T. 1986. A variant in the restriction endonucleases cleavage pattern of mitochondrial DNA in the domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus. Anim Genet. 17:159–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Lan H, Liu AH, Shi LN. 1994. Variation of mitochondrial DNA among domestic fowl and red jungle fowl. Zool Res. 15:55–60.
   Google Scholar
• William SM, Victor RD. 1997. The window of taxonomic resolution for phylogenies based on mitochondrial Cytochrome b. Avian molecular evolution and systematic. New York: Academic Press83–119.
   Google Scholar
• Yap FC, Yan YJ, Loon KT, Zhen JLN, Kamau NY, Kauran JVJ. 2010. Phylogenetic analysis of different breeds of domestic chickens in selected area of Peninsular Malaysia inferred from partial cytochrome b gene information and RAPD markers. Anim Biotechnol. 21:226–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar